- This topic has 160 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 11 months ago by stansd.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 29, 2009 at 10:18 AM #338609January 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM #338097peterbParticipant
The price of housing is predicated on the ability of the populace to pay for it. We could have a devaluation of the US$ while the populace cant afford to pay for a house. I think that basically, the US would need wages to rise in order to support house prices. If this doesnt happen, then prices have to come down.
As the govt spends more and more money, this will weaken the US$. Now, does all this govt spending result in wage increases? Or just sustaining the economy to avoid collapse?January 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM #338425peterbParticipantThe price of housing is predicated on the ability of the populace to pay for it. We could have a devaluation of the US$ while the populace cant afford to pay for a house. I think that basically, the US would need wages to rise in order to support house prices. If this doesnt happen, then prices have to come down.
As the govt spends more and more money, this will weaken the US$. Now, does all this govt spending result in wage increases? Or just sustaining the economy to avoid collapse?January 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM #338519peterbParticipantThe price of housing is predicated on the ability of the populace to pay for it. We could have a devaluation of the US$ while the populace cant afford to pay for a house. I think that basically, the US would need wages to rise in order to support house prices. If this doesnt happen, then prices have to come down.
As the govt spends more and more money, this will weaken the US$. Now, does all this govt spending result in wage increases? Or just sustaining the economy to avoid collapse?January 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM #338546peterbParticipantThe price of housing is predicated on the ability of the populace to pay for it. We could have a devaluation of the US$ while the populace cant afford to pay for a house. I think that basically, the US would need wages to rise in order to support house prices. If this doesnt happen, then prices have to come down.
As the govt spends more and more money, this will weaken the US$. Now, does all this govt spending result in wage increases? Or just sustaining the economy to avoid collapse?January 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM #338639peterbParticipantThe price of housing is predicated on the ability of the populace to pay for it. We could have a devaluation of the US$ while the populace cant afford to pay for a house. I think that basically, the US would need wages to rise in order to support house prices. If this doesnt happen, then prices have to come down.
As the govt spends more and more money, this will weaken the US$. Now, does all this govt spending result in wage increases? Or just sustaining the economy to avoid collapse?January 29, 2009 at 11:41 AM #338157DWCAPParticipantIll agree with NorLA…guy that some of the comments on this site have gotten alittle over pesmesetic as of late. I dont think we are going to a “mad max” type world, even if we go into a depression. Rather, I think all of this crap will be taken out of our countries hide in a reduced standard of living for years and years to come. We will still have cars, but teenagers will get to borrow the car for the night, not get a new mustang on their 16th bday. People will take camping vacations in the USA rather than ‘Eco’ Camping vacations in Thailand. A movie and chain resturant dinner will be alot more common than a night on the town after a steakhouse dinner.
Basically I think we will go back to a lower, if more stable, standard of living for all.
Unfornatually I also think that the gap between rich and middle class will continue to widen.January 29, 2009 at 11:41 AM #338485DWCAPParticipantIll agree with NorLA…guy that some of the comments on this site have gotten alittle over pesmesetic as of late. I dont think we are going to a “mad max” type world, even if we go into a depression. Rather, I think all of this crap will be taken out of our countries hide in a reduced standard of living for years and years to come. We will still have cars, but teenagers will get to borrow the car for the night, not get a new mustang on their 16th bday. People will take camping vacations in the USA rather than ‘Eco’ Camping vacations in Thailand. A movie and chain resturant dinner will be alot more common than a night on the town after a steakhouse dinner.
Basically I think we will go back to a lower, if more stable, standard of living for all.
Unfornatually I also think that the gap between rich and middle class will continue to widen.January 29, 2009 at 11:41 AM #338579DWCAPParticipantIll agree with NorLA…guy that some of the comments on this site have gotten alittle over pesmesetic as of late. I dont think we are going to a “mad max” type world, even if we go into a depression. Rather, I think all of this crap will be taken out of our countries hide in a reduced standard of living for years and years to come. We will still have cars, but teenagers will get to borrow the car for the night, not get a new mustang on their 16th bday. People will take camping vacations in the USA rather than ‘Eco’ Camping vacations in Thailand. A movie and chain resturant dinner will be alot more common than a night on the town after a steakhouse dinner.
Basically I think we will go back to a lower, if more stable, standard of living for all.
Unfornatually I also think that the gap between rich and middle class will continue to widen.January 29, 2009 at 11:41 AM #338607DWCAPParticipantIll agree with NorLA…guy that some of the comments on this site have gotten alittle over pesmesetic as of late. I dont think we are going to a “mad max” type world, even if we go into a depression. Rather, I think all of this crap will be taken out of our countries hide in a reduced standard of living for years and years to come. We will still have cars, but teenagers will get to borrow the car for the night, not get a new mustang on their 16th bday. People will take camping vacations in the USA rather than ‘Eco’ Camping vacations in Thailand. A movie and chain resturant dinner will be alot more common than a night on the town after a steakhouse dinner.
Basically I think we will go back to a lower, if more stable, standard of living for all.
Unfornatually I also think that the gap between rich and middle class will continue to widen.January 29, 2009 at 11:41 AM #338699DWCAPParticipantIll agree with NorLA…guy that some of the comments on this site have gotten alittle over pesmesetic as of late. I dont think we are going to a “mad max” type world, even if we go into a depression. Rather, I think all of this crap will be taken out of our countries hide in a reduced standard of living for years and years to come. We will still have cars, but teenagers will get to borrow the car for the night, not get a new mustang on their 16th bday. People will take camping vacations in the USA rather than ‘Eco’ Camping vacations in Thailand. A movie and chain resturant dinner will be alot more common than a night on the town after a steakhouse dinner.
Basically I think we will go back to a lower, if more stable, standard of living for all.
Unfornatually I also think that the gap between rich and middle class will continue to widen.January 29, 2009 at 12:41 PM #338242jficquetteParticipant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]My grand father had a 10 acre farm in the San Fernando Valley in the 1930’s right where Warner Center is now (50 story office buildings incase you are not familiar with that local),
The San Fernando valley looked a lot like Palmdale Lancaster area in the 1930’s
In 1980 irvine was mostly farm land
In 1970 Valencia CA Population was about 15 thousand.
The theme here is very fast growth over a very long time period in SoCal .
So If you get your chance to buy a home during this downturn (how ever long it lasts)
Maybe you should (If you can afford it).
Just my two cents
[/quote]That was before the Democrats ran the state into the ground.
Not sure everyone understands what a $40bill and growing state deficit means regarding future Tax increases etc.
John
January 29, 2009 at 12:41 PM #338570jficquetteParticipant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]My grand father had a 10 acre farm in the San Fernando Valley in the 1930’s right where Warner Center is now (50 story office buildings incase you are not familiar with that local),
The San Fernando valley looked a lot like Palmdale Lancaster area in the 1930’s
In 1980 irvine was mostly farm land
In 1970 Valencia CA Population was about 15 thousand.
The theme here is very fast growth over a very long time period in SoCal .
So If you get your chance to buy a home during this downturn (how ever long it lasts)
Maybe you should (If you can afford it).
Just my two cents
[/quote]That was before the Democrats ran the state into the ground.
Not sure everyone understands what a $40bill and growing state deficit means regarding future Tax increases etc.
John
January 29, 2009 at 12:41 PM #338665jficquetteParticipant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]My grand father had a 10 acre farm in the San Fernando Valley in the 1930’s right where Warner Center is now (50 story office buildings incase you are not familiar with that local),
The San Fernando valley looked a lot like Palmdale Lancaster area in the 1930’s
In 1980 irvine was mostly farm land
In 1970 Valencia CA Population was about 15 thousand.
The theme here is very fast growth over a very long time period in SoCal .
So If you get your chance to buy a home during this downturn (how ever long it lasts)
Maybe you should (If you can afford it).
Just my two cents
[/quote]That was before the Democrats ran the state into the ground.
Not sure everyone understands what a $40bill and growing state deficit means regarding future Tax increases etc.
John
January 29, 2009 at 12:41 PM #338692jficquetteParticipant[quote=Nor-LA-SD-guy]My grand father had a 10 acre farm in the San Fernando Valley in the 1930’s right where Warner Center is now (50 story office buildings incase you are not familiar with that local),
The San Fernando valley looked a lot like Palmdale Lancaster area in the 1930’s
In 1980 irvine was mostly farm land
In 1970 Valencia CA Population was about 15 thousand.
The theme here is very fast growth over a very long time period in SoCal .
So If you get your chance to buy a home during this downturn (how ever long it lasts)
Maybe you should (If you can afford it).
Just my two cents
[/quote]That was before the Democrats ran the state into the ground.
Not sure everyone understands what a $40bill and growing state deficit means regarding future Tax increases etc.
John
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.