- This topic has 48 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
markzuber.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
November 12, 2007 at 3:31 PM #10890
-
November 12, 2007 at 3:48 PM #98781
patientlywaiting
ParticipantA couple of weeks ago, I opened a CD with Countrywide at 5.65% APY (looks like rates have come down a little). It should not be a problem even in case of bank failure as long as you have less than the limit on deposit.
In the 1990s I had CDs at Imperial Savings and Home Fed. When they failed, the Resolution Trust Corporation came in and ran the banks until they found buyers for the assets. No big deal.
-
November 12, 2007 at 4:09 PM #98789
CBad
ParticipantI opened up a Countrywide CD and savings account recently as well. I’m not worried about it.
-
November 12, 2007 at 4:09 PM #98850
CBad
ParticipantI opened up a Countrywide CD and savings account recently as well. I’m not worried about it.
-
November 12, 2007 at 4:09 PM #98866
CBad
ParticipantI opened up a Countrywide CD and savings account recently as well. I’m not worried about it.
-
November 12, 2007 at 4:09 PM #98871
CBad
ParticipantI opened up a Countrywide CD and savings account recently as well. I’m not worried about it.
-
-
November 12, 2007 at 3:48 PM #98842
patientlywaiting
ParticipantA couple of weeks ago, I opened a CD with Countrywide at 5.65% APY (looks like rates have come down a little). It should not be a problem even in case of bank failure as long as you have less than the limit on deposit.
In the 1990s I had CDs at Imperial Savings and Home Fed. When they failed, the Resolution Trust Corporation came in and ran the banks until they found buyers for the assets. No big deal.
-
November 12, 2007 at 3:48 PM #98858
patientlywaiting
ParticipantA couple of weeks ago, I opened a CD with Countrywide at 5.65% APY (looks like rates have come down a little). It should not be a problem even in case of bank failure as long as you have less than the limit on deposit.
In the 1990s I had CDs at Imperial Savings and Home Fed. When they failed, the Resolution Trust Corporation came in and ran the banks until they found buyers for the assets. No big deal.
-
November 12, 2007 at 3:48 PM #98863
patientlywaiting
ParticipantA couple of weeks ago, I opened a CD with Countrywide at 5.65% APY (looks like rates have come down a little). It should not be a problem even in case of bank failure as long as you have less than the limit on deposit.
In the 1990s I had CDs at Imperial Savings and Home Fed. When they failed, the Resolution Trust Corporation came in and ran the banks until they found buyers for the assets. No big deal.
-
November 12, 2007 at 4:39 PM #98797
The OC Scam
ParticipantCountrywide issues ratings warning
Countrywide Financial Corp. (CFC:Countrywide Financial Corp
News, chart, profile, more
Last: 13.19-0.64-4.63%4:01pm 11/12/2007
Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alertInsider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
CFC 13.19, -0.64, -4.6%) warned in a securities filing that further cuts in its credit ratings to junk-bond levels could “severely” limit its ability to raise money in public debt markets and cause it to lose bank deposits.Do you want to find out how long it takes for the FDIC insurance ot kick in?
-
November 13, 2007 at 10:26 AM #99025
bub
ParticipantThanks kev374 for demonstrating the principle of Moral Hazard with a real world example.
Oh btw if Countryslide fails and you have to wait for it all to get sorted out don’t make the mistake of posting about it here.
Is it safe? Unfrickin believable!
-
November 13, 2007 at 12:02 PM #99041
kev374
Participantbub? what is your problem??
Moral Hazard is the Fed cutting interest rates and screwing over all the responsible people that depend on their savings holding it’s value.
Savings at other places doesn’t even earn enough interest to break even after inflation and taxes!
-
November 13, 2007 at 12:25 PM #99058
bub
ParticipantMy problem is the American public willing to game the system anyway they can.
FDIC Insurance is the moral hazard in this particular case.
Would you even consider for a minute putting a dime in that pos bank if it were not for FDIC insurance?
-
November 13, 2007 at 2:14 PM #99086
CBad
ParticipantNo, but it is FDIC insured so what’s your point? If banks weren’t FDIC insured I’d use a safe in my house.
-
November 13, 2007 at 2:47 PM #99090
CBad
ParticipantFYI, and how long did it take these people to get their money?
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:24 PM #99098
kev374
Participantgaming the system? bub, are you serious??
The Fed is screwing with the markets and printing money to fuel ponzi schemes and entice people to take on more debt than they can afford so a select few on Wall St. can get rich…
who is gaming who here? Are you sure the system is not gaming the responsible American Public? Better wake up buddy!
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:44 PM #99110
patientlywaiting
ParticipantLike I said before, I had money in failed S&Ls in the 1990s. It’s not a big deal. When there is a failure the receiver comes in and runs the bank like before without disruption. They then sells the assets of the bank with any short covered by the taxpayers.
Even if FDIC becomes insolvent, Congress will enact a bailout plan such as RTC to run and liquidate the banks. Just make sure that your funds are FDIC insured.
If we go the way of Argentina, then kiss the future of your kids goodbye. As far as I know, Tango and the night-life are still thriving in Buenos Aires. They are still having fun down there.
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:44 PM #99169
patientlywaiting
ParticipantLike I said before, I had money in failed S&Ls in the 1990s. It’s not a big deal. When there is a failure the receiver comes in and runs the bank like before without disruption. They then sells the assets of the bank with any short covered by the taxpayers.
Even if FDIC becomes insolvent, Congress will enact a bailout plan such as RTC to run and liquidate the banks. Just make sure that your funds are FDIC insured.
If we go the way of Argentina, then kiss the future of your kids goodbye. As far as I know, Tango and the night-life are still thriving in Buenos Aires. They are still having fun down there.
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:44 PM #99186
patientlywaiting
ParticipantLike I said before, I had money in failed S&Ls in the 1990s. It’s not a big deal. When there is a failure the receiver comes in and runs the bank like before without disruption. They then sells the assets of the bank with any short covered by the taxpayers.
Even if FDIC becomes insolvent, Congress will enact a bailout plan such as RTC to run and liquidate the banks. Just make sure that your funds are FDIC insured.
If we go the way of Argentina, then kiss the future of your kids goodbye. As far as I know, Tango and the night-life are still thriving in Buenos Aires. They are still having fun down there.
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:44 PM #99192
patientlywaiting
ParticipantLike I said before, I had money in failed S&Ls in the 1990s. It’s not a big deal. When there is a failure the receiver comes in and runs the bank like before without disruption. They then sells the assets of the bank with any short covered by the taxpayers.
Even if FDIC becomes insolvent, Congress will enact a bailout plan such as RTC to run and liquidate the banks. Just make sure that your funds are FDIC insured.
If we go the way of Argentina, then kiss the future of your kids goodbye. As far as I know, Tango and the night-life are still thriving in Buenos Aires. They are still having fun down there.
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:24 PM #99157
kev374
Participantgaming the system? bub, are you serious??
The Fed is screwing with the markets and printing money to fuel ponzi schemes and entice people to take on more debt than they can afford so a select few on Wall St. can get rich…
who is gaming who here? Are you sure the system is not gaming the responsible American Public? Better wake up buddy!
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:24 PM #99174
kev374
Participantgaming the system? bub, are you serious??
The Fed is screwing with the markets and printing money to fuel ponzi schemes and entice people to take on more debt than they can afford so a select few on Wall St. can get rich…
who is gaming who here? Are you sure the system is not gaming the responsible American Public? Better wake up buddy!
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:24 PM #99180
kev374
Participantgaming the system? bub, are you serious??
The Fed is screwing with the markets and printing money to fuel ponzi schemes and entice people to take on more debt than they can afford so a select few on Wall St. can get rich…
who is gaming who here? Are you sure the system is not gaming the responsible American Public? Better wake up buddy!
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:46 PM #99114
akbarpunjabi
ParticipantThat link to the FDIC is great. What would cause so many people to simply throw away money by having more than $100,000 in any single account? Did about 1500 people throw away around $36,000 just because they got too lazy to open up new accounts and transfer the money? I would have imagined people who banked online through NetBank would have been smarter.
-
November 13, 2007 at 6:56 PM #99158
markzuber
ParticipantWhat about deposits over $100,000. Can’t you expand the FDIC insurance protection over the $100,000 limit by adding beneficiaries to your CD? Each of beneficiaries should be entitled to recover up to $100,000. Does anyone has any personal experience with deposits over $100,000?
-
November 13, 2007 at 6:56 PM #99219
markzuber
ParticipantWhat about deposits over $100,000. Can’t you expand the FDIC insurance protection over the $100,000 limit by adding beneficiaries to your CD? Each of beneficiaries should be entitled to recover up to $100,000. Does anyone has any personal experience with deposits over $100,000?
-
November 13, 2007 at 6:56 PM #99234
markzuber
ParticipantWhat about deposits over $100,000. Can’t you expand the FDIC insurance protection over the $100,000 limit by adding beneficiaries to your CD? Each of beneficiaries should be entitled to recover up to $100,000. Does anyone has any personal experience with deposits over $100,000?
-
November 13, 2007 at 6:56 PM #99241
markzuber
ParticipantWhat about deposits over $100,000. Can’t you expand the FDIC insurance protection over the $100,000 limit by adding beneficiaries to your CD? Each of beneficiaries should be entitled to recover up to $100,000. Does anyone has any personal experience with deposits over $100,000?
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:46 PM #99173
akbarpunjabi
ParticipantThat link to the FDIC is great. What would cause so many people to simply throw away money by having more than $100,000 in any single account? Did about 1500 people throw away around $36,000 just because they got too lazy to open up new accounts and transfer the money? I would have imagined people who banked online through NetBank would have been smarter.
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:46 PM #99190
akbarpunjabi
ParticipantThat link to the FDIC is great. What would cause so many people to simply throw away money by having more than $100,000 in any single account? Did about 1500 people throw away around $36,000 just because they got too lazy to open up new accounts and transfer the money? I would have imagined people who banked online through NetBank would have been smarter.
-
November 13, 2007 at 3:46 PM #99196
akbarpunjabi
ParticipantThat link to the FDIC is great. What would cause so many people to simply throw away money by having more than $100,000 in any single account? Did about 1500 people throw away around $36,000 just because they got too lazy to open up new accounts and transfer the money? I would have imagined people who banked online through NetBank would have been smarter.
-
November 13, 2007 at 2:47 PM #99150
CBad
ParticipantFYI, and how long did it take these people to get their money?
-
November 13, 2007 at 2:47 PM #99167
CBad
ParticipantFYI, and how long did it take these people to get their money?
-
November 13, 2007 at 2:47 PM #99172
CBad
ParticipantFYI, and how long did it take these people to get their money?
-
November 13, 2007 at 2:14 PM #99146
CBad
ParticipantNo, but it is FDIC insured so what’s your point? If banks weren’t FDIC insured I’d use a safe in my house.
-
November 13, 2007 at 2:14 PM #99163
CBad
ParticipantNo, but it is FDIC insured so what’s your point? If banks weren’t FDIC insured I’d use a safe in my house.
-
November 13, 2007 at 2:14 PM #99168
CBad
ParticipantNo, but it is FDIC insured so what’s your point? If banks weren’t FDIC insured I’d use a safe in my house.
-
November 13, 2007 at 12:25 PM #99118
bub
ParticipantMy problem is the American public willing to game the system anyway they can.
FDIC Insurance is the moral hazard in this particular case.
Would you even consider for a minute putting a dime in that pos bank if it were not for FDIC insurance?
-
November 13, 2007 at 12:25 PM #99135
bub
ParticipantMy problem is the American public willing to game the system anyway they can.
FDIC Insurance is the moral hazard in this particular case.
Would you even consider for a minute putting a dime in that pos bank if it were not for FDIC insurance?
-
November 13, 2007 at 12:25 PM #99140
bub
ParticipantMy problem is the American public willing to game the system anyway they can.
FDIC Insurance is the moral hazard in this particular case.
Would you even consider for a minute putting a dime in that pos bank if it were not for FDIC insurance?
-
November 13, 2007 at 12:02 PM #99101
kev374
Participantbub? what is your problem??
Moral Hazard is the Fed cutting interest rates and screwing over all the responsible people that depend on their savings holding it’s value.
Savings at other places doesn’t even earn enough interest to break even after inflation and taxes!
-
November 13, 2007 at 12:02 PM #99119
kev374
Participantbub? what is your problem??
Moral Hazard is the Fed cutting interest rates and screwing over all the responsible people that depend on their savings holding it’s value.
Savings at other places doesn’t even earn enough interest to break even after inflation and taxes!
-
November 13, 2007 at 12:02 PM #99124
kev374
Participantbub? what is your problem??
Moral Hazard is the Fed cutting interest rates and screwing over all the responsible people that depend on their savings holding it’s value.
Savings at other places doesn’t even earn enough interest to break even after inflation and taxes!
-
-
November 13, 2007 at 10:26 AM #99085
bub
ParticipantThanks kev374 for demonstrating the principle of Moral Hazard with a real world example.
Oh btw if Countryslide fails and you have to wait for it all to get sorted out don’t make the mistake of posting about it here.
Is it safe? Unfrickin believable!
-
November 13, 2007 at 10:26 AM #99103
bub
ParticipantThanks kev374 for demonstrating the principle of Moral Hazard with a real world example.
Oh btw if Countryslide fails and you have to wait for it all to get sorted out don’t make the mistake of posting about it here.
Is it safe? Unfrickin believable!
-
November 13, 2007 at 10:26 AM #99108
bub
ParticipantThanks kev374 for demonstrating the principle of Moral Hazard with a real world example.
Oh btw if Countryslide fails and you have to wait for it all to get sorted out don’t make the mistake of posting about it here.
Is it safe? Unfrickin believable!
-
-
November 12, 2007 at 4:39 PM #98857
The OC Scam
ParticipantCountrywide issues ratings warning
Countrywide Financial Corp. (CFC:Countrywide Financial Corp
News, chart, profile, more
Last: 13.19-0.64-4.63%4:01pm 11/12/2007
Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alertInsider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
CFC 13.19, -0.64, -4.6%) warned in a securities filing that further cuts in its credit ratings to junk-bond levels could “severely” limit its ability to raise money in public debt markets and cause it to lose bank deposits.Do you want to find out how long it takes for the FDIC insurance ot kick in?
-
November 12, 2007 at 4:39 PM #98874
The OC Scam
ParticipantCountrywide issues ratings warning
Countrywide Financial Corp. (CFC:Countrywide Financial Corp
News, chart, profile, more
Last: 13.19-0.64-4.63%4:01pm 11/12/2007
Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alertInsider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
CFC 13.19, -0.64, -4.6%) warned in a securities filing that further cuts in its credit ratings to junk-bond levels could “severely” limit its ability to raise money in public debt markets and cause it to lose bank deposits.Do you want to find out how long it takes for the FDIC insurance ot kick in?
-
November 12, 2007 at 4:39 PM #98880
The OC Scam
ParticipantCountrywide issues ratings warning
Countrywide Financial Corp. (CFC:Countrywide Financial Corp
News, chart, profile, more
Last: 13.19-0.64-4.63%4:01pm 11/12/2007
Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alertInsider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
CFC 13.19, -0.64, -4.6%) warned in a securities filing that further cuts in its credit ratings to junk-bond levels could “severely” limit its ability to raise money in public debt markets and cause it to lose bank deposits.Do you want to find out how long it takes for the FDIC insurance ot kick in?
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.