Menu

Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Correction?

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 151 total)
1 2 3 … 9 10 11
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM #505335
    outtamojo
    Participant

    A little self doubt is healthy imo. Obama threatening the banks w/ more regulation is part of it too.

    January 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM #504463
    Coronita
    Participant

    [quote=outtamojo]A little self doubt is healthy imo. Obama threatening the banks w/ more regulation is part of it too.[/quote]

    The irony is the supreme court ruling on campaign contributions…I wonder which candidate the banks will be pushing for next election…

    January 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM #504606
    Coronita
    Participant

    [quote=outtamojo]A little self doubt is healthy imo. Obama threatening the banks w/ more regulation is part of it too.[/quote]

    The irony is the supreme court ruling on campaign contributions…I wonder which candidate the banks will be pushing for next election…

    January 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM #505009
    Coronita
    Participant

    [quote=outtamojo]A little self doubt is healthy imo. Obama threatening the banks w/ more regulation is part of it too.[/quote]

    The irony is the supreme court ruling on campaign contributions…I wonder which candidate the banks will be pushing for next election…

    January 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM #505102
    Coronita
    Participant

    [quote=outtamojo]A little self doubt is healthy imo. Obama threatening the banks w/ more regulation is part of it too.[/quote]

    The irony is the supreme court ruling on campaign contributions…I wonder which candidate the banks will be pushing for next election…

    January 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM #505355
    Coronita
    Participant

    [quote=outtamojo]A little self doubt is healthy imo. Obama threatening the banks w/ more regulation is part of it too.[/quote]

    The irony is the supreme court ruling on campaign contributions…I wonder which candidate the banks will be pushing for next election…

    January 22, 2010 at 9:32 AM #504471
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=flu]The irony is the supreme court ruling on campaign contributions…I wonder which candidate the banks will be pushing for next election…[/quote]

    I would think the banks would push for Obama to be re-elected. After all, he’s pretty much given them what they want. You don’t think they’re seriously threatened by his pronouncements of tough legislation do you?

    January 22, 2010 at 9:32 AM #504615
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=flu]The irony is the supreme court ruling on campaign contributions…I wonder which candidate the banks will be pushing for next election…[/quote]

    I would think the banks would push for Obama to be re-elected. After all, he’s pretty much given them what they want. You don’t think they’re seriously threatened by his pronouncements of tough legislation do you?

    January 22, 2010 at 9:32 AM #505019
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=flu]The irony is the supreme court ruling on campaign contributions…I wonder which candidate the banks will be pushing for next election…[/quote]

    I would think the banks would push for Obama to be re-elected. After all, he’s pretty much given them what they want. You don’t think they’re seriously threatened by his pronouncements of tough legislation do you?

    January 22, 2010 at 9:32 AM #505112
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=flu]The irony is the supreme court ruling on campaign contributions…I wonder which candidate the banks will be pushing for next election…[/quote]

    I would think the banks would push for Obama to be re-elected. After all, he’s pretty much given them what they want. You don’t think they’re seriously threatened by his pronouncements of tough legislation do you?

    January 22, 2010 at 9:32 AM #505365
    XBoxBoy
    Participant

    [quote=flu]The irony is the supreme court ruling on campaign contributions…I wonder which candidate the banks will be pushing for next election…[/quote]

    I would think the banks would push for Obama to be re-elected. After all, he’s pretty much given them what they want. You don’t think they’re seriously threatened by his pronouncements of tough legislation do you?

    January 22, 2010 at 9:48 AM #504486
    moneymaker
    Participant

    I personally don’t see how he can legislate such stuff, he is suppose to be an expert on the constitution ,right!?

    January 22, 2010 at 9:48 AM #504630
    moneymaker
    Participant

    I personally don’t see how he can legislate such stuff, he is suppose to be an expert on the constitution ,right!?

    January 22, 2010 at 9:48 AM #505034
    moneymaker
    Participant

    I personally don’t see how he can legislate such stuff, he is suppose to be an expert on the constitution ,right!?

    January 22, 2010 at 9:48 AM #505127
    moneymaker
    Participant

    I personally don’t see how he can legislate such stuff, he is suppose to be an expert on the constitution ,right!?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 151 total)
1 2 3 … 9 10 11
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.