Company can not keep up with demand…

[scaredyclassic]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=mike92104]
Thanks for the clearly unbiased source of information.[/quote]

If you have any data that disputes anything presented, have at it. Otherwise, that’s a horrendously ignorant ad hominem argument.[/quote]

i thought it was lready pretty clearly established that on average, greater religiosity correlates with lower IQ.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/mr-personality/201312/why-are-religious-people-generally-less-intelligent

obviously this doesn’t mean that only dumb people are religious, or all atheists are smart. Just that religious people tend to have lwoer IQs and atheists tend to have higher IQs. YMMV. if you’re dumb as a post and become an atheist, you don’t get smarter.

it can be open to what the causes are, but the set of really smart people does not overlap tremendously with the set of really religious people, I think. I could be wrong about this. but it didn’t think i t was really in dispute.

is church gonna get us back to the good old days?

Ha! fat frickin chance…i don’t think it’ll make people dumber. any more than it’ll make people better. or kinder. or less likely to shoot me. id think heavy analysis religions, with lots of analytic reading and arguemnt, like Judaism, can at least provide a good mental workout. might tend to encourage more mental activity than a more passive sit and watch relgiion.

[mike92104]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=mike92104]
Thanks for the clearly unbiased source of information.[/quote]

If you have any data that disputes anything presented, have at it. Otherwise, that’s a horrendously ignorant ad hominem argument.[/quote]

I’m sorry, are you saying that the Huffington Post isn’t biased towards left leaning ideals? That sounds like ignorance to me.

[SK in CV]

[quote=mike92104][quote=SK in CV][quote=mike92104]
Thanks for the clearly unbiased source of information.[/quote]

If you have any data that disputes anything presented, have at it. Otherwise, that’s a horrendously ignorant ad hominem argument.[/quote]

I’m sorry, are you saying that the Huffington Post isn’t biased towards left leaning ideals? That sounds like ignorance to me.[/quote]

No, I’m saying that arguing that the source is biased without a shred of evidence that any of the data presented is inaccurate is not really an argument. Show me bias the article quoted. Show me inaccuracies.

I could make the exact same argument against the article paramount posted from the Harvard Review. It was written by two guys that are bought and paid for by the gun industry. I didn’t do it, because I have no interest in researching all the errors in it. I read the first couple pages and it was clear, it wasn’t a peer reviewed study and was written with a clear bias. I’m not going to argue it here, it’s not worth my time. So I didn’t even respond to it.

[mike92104]

[quote=SK in CV][quote=mike92104][quote=SK in CV][quote=mike92104]
Thanks for the clearly unbiased source of information.[/quote]

If you have any data that disputes anything presented, have at it. Otherwise, that’s a horrendously ignorant ad hominem argument.[/quote]

I’m sorry, are you saying that the Huffington Post isn’t biased towards left leaning ideals? That sounds like ignorance to me.[/quote]

No, I’m saying that arguing that the source is biased without a shred of evidence that any of the data presented is inaccurate is not really an argument. Show me bias the article quoted. Show me inaccuracies.

I could make the exact same argument against the article paramount posted from the Harvard Review. It was written by two guys that are bought and paid for by the gun industry. I didn’t do it, because I have no interest in researching all the errors in it. I read the first couple pages and it was clear, it wasn’t a peer reviewed study and was written with a clear bias. I’m not going to argue it here, it’s not worth my time. So I didn’t even respond to it.[/quote]

I’m sorry, what exactly was my argument? I inferred that the article you referenced was published by an organization with a clear tendency to be biased toward liberal agendas.

Are you honestly asserting that the article isn’t biased?

[SK in CV]

[quote=mike92104]I’m sorry, what exactly was my argument? I inferred that the article you referenced was published by an organization with a clear tendency to be biased toward liberal agendas.

Are you honestly asserting that the article isn’t biased?[/quote]

Absolutely. If you can identify bias in the article, do so.

[Author]

Posts