Menu

Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Coming San Diego Govt Layoffs

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 396 total)
1 2 3 … 24 25 26 27
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 12, 2008 at 2:08 PM #315365
    meadandale
    Participant

    [quote=kewp]Privatize profits and socialize risk. Republican socialism at its finest![/quote]

    I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.

    December 12, 2008 at 2:15 PM #314892
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=meadandale]
    I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.
    [/quote]

    Well, its happening regardless. To a much greater degree than taxpayer financing of public-sector salaries, I’ll add.

    See:

    http://piggington.com/fed_refuses_to_disclose_recipients_of_2_trillion_in_lending

    December 12, 2008 at 2:15 PM #315248
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=meadandale]
    I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.
    [/quote]

    Well, its happening regardless. To a much greater degree than taxpayer financing of public-sector salaries, I’ll add.

    See:

    http://piggington.com/fed_refuses_to_disclose_recipients_of_2_trillion_in_lending

    December 12, 2008 at 2:15 PM #315282
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=meadandale]
    I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.
    [/quote]

    Well, its happening regardless. To a much greater degree than taxpayer financing of public-sector salaries, I’ll add.

    See:

    http://piggington.com/fed_refuses_to_disclose_recipients_of_2_trillion_in_lending

    December 12, 2008 at 2:15 PM #315304
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=meadandale]
    I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.
    [/quote]

    Well, its happening regardless. To a much greater degree than taxpayer financing of public-sector salaries, I’ll add.

    See:

    http://piggington.com/fed_refuses_to_disclose_recipients_of_2_trillion_in_lending

    December 12, 2008 at 2:15 PM #315375
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=meadandale]
    I never said that I was FOR the bailouts in the financial sector. In fact, quite the contrary; I’m not for ANY bailouts for anyone, including homeowners, bankers, auto workers and government employees.
    [/quote]

    Well, its happening regardless. To a much greater degree than taxpayer financing of public-sector salaries, I’ll add.

    See:

    http://piggington.com/fed_refuses_to_disclose_recipients_of_2_trillion_in_lending

    December 13, 2008 at 10:32 PM #315241
    LuckyInOC
    Participant

    And which side of the isle ‘was’ holding out on both the bailouts?

    Not the socialist side, but the capitalist side…

    Lucky In OC

    December 13, 2008 at 10:32 PM #315597
    LuckyInOC
    Participant

    And which side of the isle ‘was’ holding out on both the bailouts?

    Not the socialist side, but the capitalist side…

    Lucky In OC

    December 13, 2008 at 10:32 PM #315632
    LuckyInOC
    Participant

    And which side of the isle ‘was’ holding out on both the bailouts?

    Not the socialist side, but the capitalist side…

    Lucky In OC

    December 13, 2008 at 10:32 PM #315654
    LuckyInOC
    Participant

    And which side of the isle ‘was’ holding out on both the bailouts?

    Not the socialist side, but the capitalist side…

    Lucky In OC

    December 13, 2008 at 10:32 PM #315726
    LuckyInOC
    Participant

    And which side of the isle ‘was’ holding out on both the bailouts?

    Not the socialist side, but the capitalist side…

    Lucky In OC

    December 14, 2008 at 2:36 PM #315407
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=LuckyInOC]And which side of the isle ‘was’ holding out on both the bailouts?

    Not the socialist side, but the capitalist side…

    Lucky In OC[/quote]

    Only to bust the unions for the Detroit bailout, of course!

    December 14, 2008 at 2:36 PM #315760
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=LuckyInOC]And which side of the isle ‘was’ holding out on both the bailouts?

    Not the socialist side, but the capitalist side…

    Lucky In OC[/quote]

    Only to bust the unions for the Detroit bailout, of course!

    December 14, 2008 at 2:36 PM #315797
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=LuckyInOC]And which side of the isle ‘was’ holding out on both the bailouts?

    Not the socialist side, but the capitalist side…

    Lucky In OC[/quote]

    Only to bust the unions for the Detroit bailout, of course!

    December 14, 2008 at 2:36 PM #315819
    kewp
    Participant

    [quote=LuckyInOC]And which side of the isle ‘was’ holding out on both the bailouts?

    Not the socialist side, but the capitalist side…

    Lucky In OC[/quote]

    Only to bust the unions for the Detroit bailout, of course!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 396 total)
1 2 3 … 24 25 26 27
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.