Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Coming San Diego Govt Layoffs
- This topic has 395 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by
Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 9, 2008 at 8:48 AM #14597December 9, 2008 at 8:51 AM #313285
peterb
Participant’bout time!!!!
December 9, 2008 at 8:51 AM #313640peterb
Participant’bout time!!!!
December 9, 2008 at 8:51 AM #313672peterb
Participant’bout time!!!!
December 9, 2008 at 8:51 AM #313694peterb
Participant’bout time!!!!
December 9, 2008 at 8:51 AM #313764peterb
Participant’bout time!!!!
December 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM #313315kewp
ParticipantNever happen.
Assuming it did, all the anti-government weenies on piggingtons would lose their job at the taco stand anyway.
But, I’ll admit that a 5-10% haircut across the board at all gov. entities would do us all a spot a good. Give us a chance to clean out the riff-raff.
Anyways, expect a gas tax to make up the shortfall.
December 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM #313670kewp
ParticipantNever happen.
Assuming it did, all the anti-government weenies on piggingtons would lose their job at the taco stand anyway.
But, I’ll admit that a 5-10% haircut across the board at all gov. entities would do us all a spot a good. Give us a chance to clean out the riff-raff.
Anyways, expect a gas tax to make up the shortfall.
December 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM #313702kewp
ParticipantNever happen.
Assuming it did, all the anti-government weenies on piggingtons would lose their job at the taco stand anyway.
But, I’ll admit that a 5-10% haircut across the board at all gov. entities would do us all a spot a good. Give us a chance to clean out the riff-raff.
Anyways, expect a gas tax to make up the shortfall.
December 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM #313724kewp
ParticipantNever happen.
Assuming it did, all the anti-government weenies on piggingtons would lose their job at the taco stand anyway.
But, I’ll admit that a 5-10% haircut across the board at all gov. entities would do us all a spot a good. Give us a chance to clean out the riff-raff.
Anyways, expect a gas tax to make up the shortfall.
December 9, 2008 at 10:19 AM #313794kewp
ParticipantNever happen.
Assuming it did, all the anti-government weenies on piggingtons would lose their job at the taco stand anyway.
But, I’ll admit that a 5-10% haircut across the board at all gov. entities would do us all a spot a good. Give us a chance to clean out the riff-raff.
Anyways, expect a gas tax to make up the shortfall.
December 9, 2008 at 10:41 AM #313330lostcat92120
ParticipantI agree. getting rid of some of the fat would be smart. The problem goes deeper than that though. Some agencies are efficient and effective. Ones that actually operate things that people use. Others, just put studies on the shelves. I’ve worked for both public and privet sectors. I honestly think that some public sector environments are much more competitive than private. I am still not sold that private is all the efficient either. I know a lot of people in the private sector that just sit around and do nothing. This increases cost to the buyer or us. But we have to keep people working or we’ll end up like Iraq. A bunch of broke men with no jobs, no income and no family = pissed off a without direction. Not good.
December 9, 2008 at 10:41 AM #313685lostcat92120
ParticipantI agree. getting rid of some of the fat would be smart. The problem goes deeper than that though. Some agencies are efficient and effective. Ones that actually operate things that people use. Others, just put studies on the shelves. I’ve worked for both public and privet sectors. I honestly think that some public sector environments are much more competitive than private. I am still not sold that private is all the efficient either. I know a lot of people in the private sector that just sit around and do nothing. This increases cost to the buyer or us. But we have to keep people working or we’ll end up like Iraq. A bunch of broke men with no jobs, no income and no family = pissed off a without direction. Not good.
December 9, 2008 at 10:41 AM #313716lostcat92120
ParticipantI agree. getting rid of some of the fat would be smart. The problem goes deeper than that though. Some agencies are efficient and effective. Ones that actually operate things that people use. Others, just put studies on the shelves. I’ve worked for both public and privet sectors. I honestly think that some public sector environments are much more competitive than private. I am still not sold that private is all the efficient either. I know a lot of people in the private sector that just sit around and do nothing. This increases cost to the buyer or us. But we have to keep people working or we’ll end up like Iraq. A bunch of broke men with no jobs, no income and no family = pissed off a without direction. Not good.
December 9, 2008 at 10:41 AM #313739lostcat92120
ParticipantI agree. getting rid of some of the fat would be smart. The problem goes deeper than that though. Some agencies are efficient and effective. Ones that actually operate things that people use. Others, just put studies on the shelves. I’ve worked for both public and privet sectors. I honestly think that some public sector environments are much more competitive than private. I am still not sold that private is all the efficient either. I know a lot of people in the private sector that just sit around and do nothing. This increases cost to the buyer or us. But we have to keep people working or we’ll end up like Iraq. A bunch of broke men with no jobs, no income and no family = pissed off a without direction. Not good.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
