- This topic has 310 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
bearishgurl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 6, 2011 at 1:42 PM #694173May 6, 2011 at 1:52 PM #692996
Scarlett
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
There is already an overflow of qualified applicants for CA university billets and this DID NOT translate into more admissions or classes for students. In addition, the fees have been raised at least 10 times in the CSU system in the last eight or so years. It appears to me that the two systems are trying to eliminate more pension obligations so are letting go instructors before they vest. Meanwhile, the ones that are retiring are not being replaced. One business department head at SFSU told me that he had never been asked to lay off as many instructors as he had to in 2010 in his 30+ years in the system.[/quote]I can believe that. But then the supply is very limited – and kept artificially that way – and the demand very high – so why not increase the fees – that are plenty of people qualified and willing to pay (or borrow)….that’s the bubble. Well, this has to burst sometime.
I just wonder how the dynamics will change when more people, for example in CA, can’t get in UC or CS and have to go out of state or private and therefore they (or their parents) HAVE to borrow more money. And those people upon graduation will default on the loans because they won’t have high enough paid jobs. Or they keep piling on more debt, making that much harder to marry and have kids and nearly impossbile to buy a house…. Hmmm. maybe that will push the house prices down….
May 6, 2011 at 1:52 PM #693074Scarlett
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
There is already an overflow of qualified applicants for CA university billets and this DID NOT translate into more admissions or classes for students. In addition, the fees have been raised at least 10 times in the CSU system in the last eight or so years. It appears to me that the two systems are trying to eliminate more pension obligations so are letting go instructors before they vest. Meanwhile, the ones that are retiring are not being replaced. One business department head at SFSU told me that he had never been asked to lay off as many instructors as he had to in 2010 in his 30+ years in the system.[/quote]I can believe that. But then the supply is very limited – and kept artificially that way – and the demand very high – so why not increase the fees – that are plenty of people qualified and willing to pay (or borrow)….that’s the bubble. Well, this has to burst sometime.
I just wonder how the dynamics will change when more people, for example in CA, can’t get in UC or CS and have to go out of state or private and therefore they (or their parents) HAVE to borrow more money. And those people upon graduation will default on the loans because they won’t have high enough paid jobs. Or they keep piling on more debt, making that much harder to marry and have kids and nearly impossbile to buy a house…. Hmmm. maybe that will push the house prices down….
May 6, 2011 at 1:52 PM #693679Scarlett
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
There is already an overflow of qualified applicants for CA university billets and this DID NOT translate into more admissions or classes for students. In addition, the fees have been raised at least 10 times in the CSU system in the last eight or so years. It appears to me that the two systems are trying to eliminate more pension obligations so are letting go instructors before they vest. Meanwhile, the ones that are retiring are not being replaced. One business department head at SFSU told me that he had never been asked to lay off as many instructors as he had to in 2010 in his 30+ years in the system.[/quote]I can believe that. But then the supply is very limited – and kept artificially that way – and the demand very high – so why not increase the fees – that are plenty of people qualified and willing to pay (or borrow)….that’s the bubble. Well, this has to burst sometime.
I just wonder how the dynamics will change when more people, for example in CA, can’t get in UC or CS and have to go out of state or private and therefore they (or their parents) HAVE to borrow more money. And those people upon graduation will default on the loans because they won’t have high enough paid jobs. Or they keep piling on more debt, making that much harder to marry and have kids and nearly impossbile to buy a house…. Hmmm. maybe that will push the house prices down….
May 6, 2011 at 1:52 PM #693826Scarlett
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
There is already an overflow of qualified applicants for CA university billets and this DID NOT translate into more admissions or classes for students. In addition, the fees have been raised at least 10 times in the CSU system in the last eight or so years. It appears to me that the two systems are trying to eliminate more pension obligations so are letting go instructors before they vest. Meanwhile, the ones that are retiring are not being replaced. One business department head at SFSU told me that he had never been asked to lay off as many instructors as he had to in 2010 in his 30+ years in the system.[/quote]I can believe that. But then the supply is very limited – and kept artificially that way – and the demand very high – so why not increase the fees – that are plenty of people qualified and willing to pay (or borrow)….that’s the bubble. Well, this has to burst sometime.
I just wonder how the dynamics will change when more people, for example in CA, can’t get in UC or CS and have to go out of state or private and therefore they (or their parents) HAVE to borrow more money. And those people upon graduation will default on the loans because they won’t have high enough paid jobs. Or they keep piling on more debt, making that much harder to marry and have kids and nearly impossbile to buy a house…. Hmmm. maybe that will push the house prices down….
May 6, 2011 at 1:52 PM #694178Scarlett
Participant[quote=bearishgurl]
There is already an overflow of qualified applicants for CA university billets and this DID NOT translate into more admissions or classes for students. In addition, the fees have been raised at least 10 times in the CSU system in the last eight or so years. It appears to me that the two systems are trying to eliminate more pension obligations so are letting go instructors before they vest. Meanwhile, the ones that are retiring are not being replaced. One business department head at SFSU told me that he had never been asked to lay off as many instructors as he had to in 2010 in his 30+ years in the system.[/quote]I can believe that. But then the supply is very limited – and kept artificially that way – and the demand very high – so why not increase the fees – that are plenty of people qualified and willing to pay (or borrow)….that’s the bubble. Well, this has to burst sometime.
I just wonder how the dynamics will change when more people, for example in CA, can’t get in UC or CS and have to go out of state or private and therefore they (or their parents) HAVE to borrow more money. And those people upon graduation will default on the loans because they won’t have high enough paid jobs. Or they keep piling on more debt, making that much harder to marry and have kids and nearly impossbile to buy a house…. Hmmm. maybe that will push the house prices down….
May 6, 2011 at 2:01 PM #693001bearishgurl
ParticipantThere is another solution if your recent HS grad is qualified for and having difficulty getting accepted into CSU/UC as a freshman or is a junior who is unable to enter into the program of their choice in CSU/UC after community college. If you have willing relatives in another state, you can send your kid to live with them where they will have to get some kind of work (even min wage) immediately and start producing checkstubs and eventually W-2(s) to prove they have been a resident of that state for at least one year. Between you and your kid, you could compensate the host relative. It wouldn’t be a crime to take a year-plus off in the college-age years to work. They would absolutely HAVE to work to prove residency, though, AND claim themselves on their tax return(s). Most states are very strict on accepting young students as residents who possess recent out-of-state HS diplomas or Associate degrees. They ALL want the out-of-state tuition if they can get it. They will not accept “living with grandma” as being a resident. The kid could have just arrived last week.
May 6, 2011 at 2:01 PM #693079bearishgurl
ParticipantThere is another solution if your recent HS grad is qualified for and having difficulty getting accepted into CSU/UC as a freshman or is a junior who is unable to enter into the program of their choice in CSU/UC after community college. If you have willing relatives in another state, you can send your kid to live with them where they will have to get some kind of work (even min wage) immediately and start producing checkstubs and eventually W-2(s) to prove they have been a resident of that state for at least one year. Between you and your kid, you could compensate the host relative. It wouldn’t be a crime to take a year-plus off in the college-age years to work. They would absolutely HAVE to work to prove residency, though, AND claim themselves on their tax return(s). Most states are very strict on accepting young students as residents who possess recent out-of-state HS diplomas or Associate degrees. They ALL want the out-of-state tuition if they can get it. They will not accept “living with grandma” as being a resident. The kid could have just arrived last week.
May 6, 2011 at 2:01 PM #693684bearishgurl
ParticipantThere is another solution if your recent HS grad is qualified for and having difficulty getting accepted into CSU/UC as a freshman or is a junior who is unable to enter into the program of their choice in CSU/UC after community college. If you have willing relatives in another state, you can send your kid to live with them where they will have to get some kind of work (even min wage) immediately and start producing checkstubs and eventually W-2(s) to prove they have been a resident of that state for at least one year. Between you and your kid, you could compensate the host relative. It wouldn’t be a crime to take a year-plus off in the college-age years to work. They would absolutely HAVE to work to prove residency, though, AND claim themselves on their tax return(s). Most states are very strict on accepting young students as residents who possess recent out-of-state HS diplomas or Associate degrees. They ALL want the out-of-state tuition if they can get it. They will not accept “living with grandma” as being a resident. The kid could have just arrived last week.
May 6, 2011 at 2:01 PM #693831bearishgurl
ParticipantThere is another solution if your recent HS grad is qualified for and having difficulty getting accepted into CSU/UC as a freshman or is a junior who is unable to enter into the program of their choice in CSU/UC after community college. If you have willing relatives in another state, you can send your kid to live with them where they will have to get some kind of work (even min wage) immediately and start producing checkstubs and eventually W-2(s) to prove they have been a resident of that state for at least one year. Between you and your kid, you could compensate the host relative. It wouldn’t be a crime to take a year-plus off in the college-age years to work. They would absolutely HAVE to work to prove residency, though, AND claim themselves on their tax return(s). Most states are very strict on accepting young students as residents who possess recent out-of-state HS diplomas or Associate degrees. They ALL want the out-of-state tuition if they can get it. They will not accept “living with grandma” as being a resident. The kid could have just arrived last week.
May 6, 2011 at 2:01 PM #694183bearishgurl
ParticipantThere is another solution if your recent HS grad is qualified for and having difficulty getting accepted into CSU/UC as a freshman or is a junior who is unable to enter into the program of their choice in CSU/UC after community college. If you have willing relatives in another state, you can send your kid to live with them where they will have to get some kind of work (even min wage) immediately and start producing checkstubs and eventually W-2(s) to prove they have been a resident of that state for at least one year. Between you and your kid, you could compensate the host relative. It wouldn’t be a crime to take a year-plus off in the college-age years to work. They would absolutely HAVE to work to prove residency, though, AND claim themselves on their tax return(s). Most states are very strict on accepting young students as residents who possess recent out-of-state HS diplomas or Associate degrees. They ALL want the out-of-state tuition if they can get it. They will not accept “living with grandma” as being a resident. The kid could have just arrived last week.
May 6, 2011 at 2:09 PM #693016an
Participant[quote=Scarlett] And those people upon graduation will default on the loans because they won’t have high enough paid jobs. Or they keep piling on more debt, making that much harder to marry and have kids and nearly impossbile to buy a house…. Hmmm. maybe that will push the house prices down….[/quote]
AFAIK, you can’t default on a student loan. That’s why they can give student loans at such a low rate, because they know you have to pay it back.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student_loan_default_in_the_United_States
May 6, 2011 at 2:09 PM #693094an
Participant[quote=Scarlett] And those people upon graduation will default on the loans because they won’t have high enough paid jobs. Or they keep piling on more debt, making that much harder to marry and have kids and nearly impossbile to buy a house…. Hmmm. maybe that will push the house prices down….[/quote]
AFAIK, you can’t default on a student loan. That’s why they can give student loans at such a low rate, because they know you have to pay it back.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student_loan_default_in_the_United_States
May 6, 2011 at 2:09 PM #693700an
Participant[quote=Scarlett] And those people upon graduation will default on the loans because they won’t have high enough paid jobs. Or they keep piling on more debt, making that much harder to marry and have kids and nearly impossbile to buy a house…. Hmmm. maybe that will push the house prices down….[/quote]
AFAIK, you can’t default on a student loan. That’s why they can give student loans at such a low rate, because they know you have to pay it back.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student_loan_default_in_the_United_States
May 6, 2011 at 2:09 PM #693846an
Participant[quote=Scarlett] And those people upon graduation will default on the loans because they won’t have high enough paid jobs. Or they keep piling on more debt, making that much harder to marry and have kids and nearly impossbile to buy a house…. Hmmm. maybe that will push the house prices down….[/quote]
AFAIK, you can’t default on a student loan. That’s why they can give student loans at such a low rate, because they know you have to pay it back.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student_loan_default_in_the_United_States
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
