- This topic has 120 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 5, 2010 at 9:10 AM #522169March 5, 2010 at 9:27 AM #521261afx114Participant
Not defending the Coffee Party because I think it is would have been better as a skit on SNL, but it’s interesting that Jim Jones’ article sites her working for two candidates who won largely thanks to grassroots (Obama, Webb) as evidence of her not being grassroots.
And somehow the fact that she worked for the NYT for 18 months ten years ago is evidence of astroturfing? That’s like saying that your favorite burger is McDonalds because you worked there 10 years ago.
As Brian says, if they’re trying to compare her to Dick Armey and Rick Santelli, their argument is a failure. This looks more to me like Rove 101: Turn your enemy’s strength into their weakness.
March 5, 2010 at 9:27 AM #521400afx114ParticipantNot defending the Coffee Party because I think it is would have been better as a skit on SNL, but it’s interesting that Jim Jones’ article sites her working for two candidates who won largely thanks to grassroots (Obama, Webb) as evidence of her not being grassroots.
And somehow the fact that she worked for the NYT for 18 months ten years ago is evidence of astroturfing? That’s like saying that your favorite burger is McDonalds because you worked there 10 years ago.
As Brian says, if they’re trying to compare her to Dick Armey and Rick Santelli, their argument is a failure. This looks more to me like Rove 101: Turn your enemy’s strength into their weakness.
March 5, 2010 at 9:27 AM #521833afx114ParticipantNot defending the Coffee Party because I think it is would have been better as a skit on SNL, but it’s interesting that Jim Jones’ article sites her working for two candidates who won largely thanks to grassroots (Obama, Webb) as evidence of her not being grassroots.
And somehow the fact that she worked for the NYT for 18 months ten years ago is evidence of astroturfing? That’s like saying that your favorite burger is McDonalds because you worked there 10 years ago.
As Brian says, if they’re trying to compare her to Dick Armey and Rick Santelli, their argument is a failure. This looks more to me like Rove 101: Turn your enemy’s strength into their weakness.
March 5, 2010 at 9:27 AM #521925afx114ParticipantNot defending the Coffee Party because I think it is would have been better as a skit on SNL, but it’s interesting that Jim Jones’ article sites her working for two candidates who won largely thanks to grassroots (Obama, Webb) as evidence of her not being grassroots.
And somehow the fact that she worked for the NYT for 18 months ten years ago is evidence of astroturfing? That’s like saying that your favorite burger is McDonalds because you worked there 10 years ago.
As Brian says, if they’re trying to compare her to Dick Armey and Rick Santelli, their argument is a failure. This looks more to me like Rove 101: Turn your enemy’s strength into their weakness.
March 5, 2010 at 9:27 AM #522180afx114ParticipantNot defending the Coffee Party because I think it is would have been better as a skit on SNL, but it’s interesting that Jim Jones’ article sites her working for two candidates who won largely thanks to grassroots (Obama, Webb) as evidence of her not being grassroots.
And somehow the fact that she worked for the NYT for 18 months ten years ago is evidence of astroturfing? That’s like saying that your favorite burger is McDonalds because you worked there 10 years ago.
As Brian says, if they’re trying to compare her to Dick Armey and Rick Santelli, their argument is a failure. This looks more to me like Rove 101: Turn your enemy’s strength into their weakness.
March 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM #521283Allan from FallbrookParticipantAfx: Wouldn’t you agree that extremists of both parties are creating the polarization and Balkanization in American politics that we’re seeing today?
I very much agree about Karl Rove (Republicans), but you have Saul Alinsky (Democrats) on the other side as well.
March 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM #521423Allan from FallbrookParticipantAfx: Wouldn’t you agree that extremists of both parties are creating the polarization and Balkanization in American politics that we’re seeing today?
I very much agree about Karl Rove (Republicans), but you have Saul Alinsky (Democrats) on the other side as well.
March 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM #521856Allan from FallbrookParticipantAfx: Wouldn’t you agree that extremists of both parties are creating the polarization and Balkanization in American politics that we’re seeing today?
I very much agree about Karl Rove (Republicans), but you have Saul Alinsky (Democrats) on the other side as well.
March 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM #521946Allan from FallbrookParticipantAfx: Wouldn’t you agree that extremists of both parties are creating the polarization and Balkanization in American politics that we’re seeing today?
I very much agree about Karl Rove (Republicans), but you have Saul Alinsky (Democrats) on the other side as well.
March 5, 2010 at 10:37 AM #522202Allan from FallbrookParticipantAfx: Wouldn’t you agree that extremists of both parties are creating the polarization and Balkanization in American politics that we’re seeing today?
I very much agree about Karl Rove (Republicans), but you have Saul Alinsky (Democrats) on the other side as well.
March 5, 2010 at 12:53 PM #521338briansd1Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Afx: Wouldn’t you agree that extremists of both parties are creating the polarization and Balkanization in American politics that we’re seeing today?[/quote]
I agree with that.
BUT Democrats generally react to the divide-and-conquer tactics of the Republicans.
Republicans only understand offense and deterrence with strength (after all they are defense hawks).
It would very unwise for the Democrats to unilaterally wave the white flag first. As Allan so aptly put it on the other thread:
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Obama delivered himself to the Republicans with his neck already exposed and they pounced.
[/quote]March 5, 2010 at 12:53 PM #521476briansd1Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Afx: Wouldn’t you agree that extremists of both parties are creating the polarization and Balkanization in American politics that we’re seeing today?[/quote]
I agree with that.
BUT Democrats generally react to the divide-and-conquer tactics of the Republicans.
Republicans only understand offense and deterrence with strength (after all they are defense hawks).
It would very unwise for the Democrats to unilaterally wave the white flag first. As Allan so aptly put it on the other thread:
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Obama delivered himself to the Republicans with his neck already exposed and they pounced.
[/quote]March 5, 2010 at 12:53 PM #521909briansd1Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Afx: Wouldn’t you agree that extremists of both parties are creating the polarization and Balkanization in American politics that we’re seeing today?[/quote]
I agree with that.
BUT Democrats generally react to the divide-and-conquer tactics of the Republicans.
Republicans only understand offense and deterrence with strength (after all they are defense hawks).
It would very unwise for the Democrats to unilaterally wave the white flag first. As Allan so aptly put it on the other thread:
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Obama delivered himself to the Republicans with his neck already exposed and they pounced.
[/quote]March 5, 2010 at 12:53 PM #521999briansd1Guest[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]Afx: Wouldn’t you agree that extremists of both parties are creating the polarization and Balkanization in American politics that we’re seeing today?[/quote]
I agree with that.
BUT Democrats generally react to the divide-and-conquer tactics of the Republicans.
Republicans only understand offense and deterrence with strength (after all they are defense hawks).
It would very unwise for the Democrats to unilaterally wave the white flag first. As Allan so aptly put it on the other thread:
[quote=Allan from Fallbrook]
Obama delivered himself to the Republicans with his neck already exposed and they pounced.
[/quote] -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.