Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Close your accoutns at banks that took TARP
- This topic has 345 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by davelj.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 7, 2009 at 10:41 AM #378038April 7, 2009 at 10:46 AM #377421CoronitaParticipant
[quote]
Emigrant didn’t take TARP. My actions are consistent with my words.
[/quote]Not to add insult to injury..But let’s play connect the dots….
1) Emigrant Direct is the online division of
Emigrant Bank2) Emigrant Bank is owned by….
New York Private Bank and Trust CorporationGuess what?… New York Private Bank and Trust Corp RECEIVED tarp: $267,274,000 and change.
Enjoy the data….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Private_Bank_&_Trust_Corp.
You can also read about Emigrant Bank’s troubled assets here:
http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/new-york/new-york/emigrant-bank/, hence probably why there is a 1 star rating on the bank.
April 7, 2009 at 10:46 AM #377697CoronitaParticipant[quote]
Emigrant didn’t take TARP. My actions are consistent with my words.
[/quote]Not to add insult to injury..But let’s play connect the dots….
1) Emigrant Direct is the online division of
Emigrant Bank2) Emigrant Bank is owned by….
New York Private Bank and Trust CorporationGuess what?… New York Private Bank and Trust Corp RECEIVED tarp: $267,274,000 and change.
Enjoy the data….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Private_Bank_&_Trust_Corp.
You can also read about Emigrant Bank’s troubled assets here:
http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/new-york/new-york/emigrant-bank/, hence probably why there is a 1 star rating on the bank.
April 7, 2009 at 10:46 AM #377875CoronitaParticipant[quote]
Emigrant didn’t take TARP. My actions are consistent with my words.
[/quote]Not to add insult to injury..But let’s play connect the dots….
1) Emigrant Direct is the online division of
Emigrant Bank2) Emigrant Bank is owned by….
New York Private Bank and Trust CorporationGuess what?… New York Private Bank and Trust Corp RECEIVED tarp: $267,274,000 and change.
Enjoy the data….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Private_Bank_&_Trust_Corp.
You can also read about Emigrant Bank’s troubled assets here:
http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/new-york/new-york/emigrant-bank/, hence probably why there is a 1 star rating on the bank.
April 7, 2009 at 10:46 AM #377917CoronitaParticipant[quote]
Emigrant didn’t take TARP. My actions are consistent with my words.
[/quote]Not to add insult to injury..But let’s play connect the dots….
1) Emigrant Direct is the online division of
Emigrant Bank2) Emigrant Bank is owned by….
New York Private Bank and Trust CorporationGuess what?… New York Private Bank and Trust Corp RECEIVED tarp: $267,274,000 and change.
Enjoy the data….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Private_Bank_&_Trust_Corp.
You can also read about Emigrant Bank’s troubled assets here:
http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/new-york/new-york/emigrant-bank/, hence probably why there is a 1 star rating on the bank.
April 7, 2009 at 10:46 AM #378043CoronitaParticipant[quote]
Emigrant didn’t take TARP. My actions are consistent with my words.
[/quote]Not to add insult to injury..But let’s play connect the dots….
1) Emigrant Direct is the online division of
Emigrant Bank2) Emigrant Bank is owned by….
New York Private Bank and Trust CorporationGuess what?… New York Private Bank and Trust Corp RECEIVED tarp: $267,274,000 and change.
Enjoy the data….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Private_Bank_&_Trust_Corp.
You can also read about Emigrant Bank’s troubled assets here:
http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/new-york/new-york/emigrant-bank/, hence probably why there is a 1 star rating on the bank.
April 7, 2009 at 10:48 AM #377426daveljParticipant[quote=flu][quote]
Emigrant didn’t take TARP. My actions are consistent with my words.
[/quote]Not to add insult to injury..But let’s play connect the dots….
1) Emigrant Direct is the online division of
Emigrant Bank2) Emigrant Bank is owned by….
New York Private Bank and Trust CorporationGuess what?… New York Private Bank and Trust Corp RECEIVED tarp: $267,274,000 and change.
Enjoy the data….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Private_Bank_&_Trust_Corp.
You can also read about Emigrant Bank’s troubled assets here:
http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/new-york/new-york/emigrant-bank/, hence probably why there is a 1 star rating on the bank.
[/quote]
Nice find flu. I didn’t bother to dig that deep. Yes, the TARP funds are received at the holding company level and downstreamed to the subs.
Someone will be looking for a new bank soon.
April 7, 2009 at 10:48 AM #377702daveljParticipant[quote=flu][quote]
Emigrant didn’t take TARP. My actions are consistent with my words.
[/quote]Not to add insult to injury..But let’s play connect the dots….
1) Emigrant Direct is the online division of
Emigrant Bank2) Emigrant Bank is owned by….
New York Private Bank and Trust CorporationGuess what?… New York Private Bank and Trust Corp RECEIVED tarp: $267,274,000 and change.
Enjoy the data….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Private_Bank_&_Trust_Corp.
You can also read about Emigrant Bank’s troubled assets here:
http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/new-york/new-york/emigrant-bank/, hence probably why there is a 1 star rating on the bank.
[/quote]
Nice find flu. I didn’t bother to dig that deep. Yes, the TARP funds are received at the holding company level and downstreamed to the subs.
Someone will be looking for a new bank soon.
April 7, 2009 at 10:48 AM #377880daveljParticipant[quote=flu][quote]
Emigrant didn’t take TARP. My actions are consistent with my words.
[/quote]Not to add insult to injury..But let’s play connect the dots….
1) Emigrant Direct is the online division of
Emigrant Bank2) Emigrant Bank is owned by….
New York Private Bank and Trust CorporationGuess what?… New York Private Bank and Trust Corp RECEIVED tarp: $267,274,000 and change.
Enjoy the data….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Private_Bank_&_Trust_Corp.
You can also read about Emigrant Bank’s troubled assets here:
http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/new-york/new-york/emigrant-bank/, hence probably why there is a 1 star rating on the bank.
[/quote]
Nice find flu. I didn’t bother to dig that deep. Yes, the TARP funds are received at the holding company level and downstreamed to the subs.
Someone will be looking for a new bank soon.
April 7, 2009 at 10:48 AM #377922daveljParticipant[quote=flu][quote]
Emigrant didn’t take TARP. My actions are consistent with my words.
[/quote]Not to add insult to injury..But let’s play connect the dots….
1) Emigrant Direct is the online division of
Emigrant Bank2) Emigrant Bank is owned by….
New York Private Bank and Trust CorporationGuess what?… New York Private Bank and Trust Corp RECEIVED tarp: $267,274,000 and change.
Enjoy the data….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Private_Bank_&_Trust_Corp.
You can also read about Emigrant Bank’s troubled assets here:
http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/new-york/new-york/emigrant-bank/, hence probably why there is a 1 star rating on the bank.
[/quote]
Nice find flu. I didn’t bother to dig that deep. Yes, the TARP funds are received at the holding company level and downstreamed to the subs.
Someone will be looking for a new bank soon.
April 7, 2009 at 10:48 AM #378048daveljParticipant[quote=flu][quote]
Emigrant didn’t take TARP. My actions are consistent with my words.
[/quote]Not to add insult to injury..But let’s play connect the dots….
1) Emigrant Direct is the online division of
Emigrant Bank2) Emigrant Bank is owned by….
New York Private Bank and Trust CorporationGuess what?… New York Private Bank and Trust Corp RECEIVED tarp: $267,274,000 and change.
Enjoy the data….
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Private_Bank_&_Trust_Corp.
You can also read about Emigrant Bank’s troubled assets here:
http://banktracker.investigativereportingworkshop.org/banks/new-york/new-york/emigrant-bank/, hence probably why there is a 1 star rating on the bank.
[/quote]
Nice find flu. I didn’t bother to dig that deep. Yes, the TARP funds are received at the holding company level and downstreamed to the subs.
Someone will be looking for a new bank soon.
April 7, 2009 at 11:02 AM #377436CoronitaParticipant[quote=davelj]Nice find flu. I didn’t bother to dig that deep. Yes, the TARP funds are received at the holding company level and downstreamed to the subs.
[/quote]I thought it was interesting because it’s not so black and white as one may seem. Here was a riddle. I use to have an account with GMAC, that paid close to 5% on an unsecured note. I could deposit and withdraw as please. Then GMAC started to have all these problems, and I’m like holy crap, I don’t have the safety net of an FDIC insurance. So I took out all my money except $100. A couple of months later. GMAC became GMAC Bank…Fully insured….Go figure…..
There is no clean institution, During the haydays, when banks were “banking” 20+% interest on some of the shady debt, banks that didn’t do these shady deals probably were assaulted by greedy shareholders: “why aren’t you making 20+% like the other banks”….Call it peer pressure, but banks probably were pushed into these shady loans to prop up shareholder’s demands….Hence why I don’t think you’ll find that many clean institutions. (my opinion). Good luck finding one.
Credit Unions are probably cleaner, but I don’t have the time nor patience to embark on this journey.
April 7, 2009 at 11:02 AM #377712CoronitaParticipant[quote=davelj]Nice find flu. I didn’t bother to dig that deep. Yes, the TARP funds are received at the holding company level and downstreamed to the subs.
[/quote]I thought it was interesting because it’s not so black and white as one may seem. Here was a riddle. I use to have an account with GMAC, that paid close to 5% on an unsecured note. I could deposit and withdraw as please. Then GMAC started to have all these problems, and I’m like holy crap, I don’t have the safety net of an FDIC insurance. So I took out all my money except $100. A couple of months later. GMAC became GMAC Bank…Fully insured….Go figure…..
There is no clean institution, During the haydays, when banks were “banking” 20+% interest on some of the shady debt, banks that didn’t do these shady deals probably were assaulted by greedy shareholders: “why aren’t you making 20+% like the other banks”….Call it peer pressure, but banks probably were pushed into these shady loans to prop up shareholder’s demands….Hence why I don’t think you’ll find that many clean institutions. (my opinion). Good luck finding one.
Credit Unions are probably cleaner, but I don’t have the time nor patience to embark on this journey.
April 7, 2009 at 11:02 AM #377890CoronitaParticipant[quote=davelj]Nice find flu. I didn’t bother to dig that deep. Yes, the TARP funds are received at the holding company level and downstreamed to the subs.
[/quote]I thought it was interesting because it’s not so black and white as one may seem. Here was a riddle. I use to have an account with GMAC, that paid close to 5% on an unsecured note. I could deposit and withdraw as please. Then GMAC started to have all these problems, and I’m like holy crap, I don’t have the safety net of an FDIC insurance. So I took out all my money except $100. A couple of months later. GMAC became GMAC Bank…Fully insured….Go figure…..
There is no clean institution, During the haydays, when banks were “banking” 20+% interest on some of the shady debt, banks that didn’t do these shady deals probably were assaulted by greedy shareholders: “why aren’t you making 20+% like the other banks”….Call it peer pressure, but banks probably were pushed into these shady loans to prop up shareholder’s demands….Hence why I don’t think you’ll find that many clean institutions. (my opinion). Good luck finding one.
Credit Unions are probably cleaner, but I don’t have the time nor patience to embark on this journey.
April 7, 2009 at 11:02 AM #377932CoronitaParticipant[quote=davelj]Nice find flu. I didn’t bother to dig that deep. Yes, the TARP funds are received at the holding company level and downstreamed to the subs.
[/quote]I thought it was interesting because it’s not so black and white as one may seem. Here was a riddle. I use to have an account with GMAC, that paid close to 5% on an unsecured note. I could deposit and withdraw as please. Then GMAC started to have all these problems, and I’m like holy crap, I don’t have the safety net of an FDIC insurance. So I took out all my money except $100. A couple of months later. GMAC became GMAC Bank…Fully insured….Go figure…..
There is no clean institution, During the haydays, when banks were “banking” 20+% interest on some of the shady debt, banks that didn’t do these shady deals probably were assaulted by greedy shareholders: “why aren’t you making 20+% like the other banks”….Call it peer pressure, but banks probably were pushed into these shady loans to prop up shareholder’s demands….Hence why I don’t think you’ll find that many clean institutions. (my opinion). Good luck finding one.
Credit Unions are probably cleaner, but I don’t have the time nor patience to embark on this journey.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.