- This topic has 235 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by
Aecetia.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 12, 2008 at 1:49 AM #221779June 12, 2008 at 5:21 PM #222131
partypup
ParticipantCAPS below:
Partypup,
1) My believe my previous posts indicate, even state I know where we’re headed, a refresher course on “macroeconomics” not necessary. Check that. REALLY? IF YOU AGREE WITH MY MARCOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT, THEN WHAT IS SO “PESSISMISTIC” ABOUT WHAT I AM SAYING? EXTREMELY CURIOUS TO HEAR YOUR RESPONSE. YOUR TURN TO CHECK.
2)I haven’t whined about the burden of being black. YOU HAVEN’T EXPRESSED TO POSTERS ON THIS BOARD HOW THEY CAN’T RELATE TO OBAMA OR OTHER BLACK PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ARE WHITE AND HAVE NOT BEEN DISCRIMINATED AGAINST? YOU’RE TELLING ME THAT I’M IMAGINING THIS? CHECKED.
3) The particular term I used to describe Hillary wasn’t based on her sex. Check that. I STAND CORRECTED. IT WAS CONDELEEZA RICE TO WHOM YOU REFERRED TO AS A “LIAR” AND “SOME MAY EVEN CALL A BITCH”. NICE TO KNOW YOU FEEL EQUAL DISDAIN FOR WHITE AND BLACK WOMEN. CHECKED.
4) The fact that Hillary’s shares my party afiliation doesn’t guarantee my respect. Check that. MY COMMENT WAS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT YOU SPEAK OF PARTY UNITY, BUT YET YOU DENIGRATE ONE MEMBER OF YOUR PARTY IN ORDER TO PROMOTE ANOTHER. HOW DOES THAT SPEAK TO THE PARTY UNITY OF WHICH PORTLOCK WAS ADVOCATING? CHECKED.
5) Yes, you’ve done nothing but whine since your arrival. Check that. ??? CAN YOU PLEASE BE SPECIFIC ABOUT WHAT I’VE BEEN WHINING? OR IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK? I’M DYING TO SEE WHAT EVIDENCE YOU DIG UP HERE. SERIOUSLY. YOUR TURN TO CHECK.
Hmm, “pedestrian”, “macroeconomics”, “epithet”. Partypup, allow me to become “ghetto” on you for a moment. You’ve used some very “grand” words, but you haven’t said sh!t! YOU’VE GONE GHETTO ON ME FROM THE BEGINNING. WHAT’S NEW? AMD RATHER THAN RESPOND TO MY POINTS, YOU JUST TO WRITE THEM OFF AS “I HAVEN’T SAID SHIT.” THAT REALLY TOOK A LOT OF MENTAL EFFORT. AND BY THE WAY, YOU HAVE TO READ THE COMPLETE SENTENCES, NOT JUST THE BIG WORDS, IN ORDER TO GRASP MY MEANING. KEEP A DICTIONARY HANDY IF YOU HAVE TROUBLE GETTING THROUGH MY POSTS. I MAY NOT HAVE SAID “SHIT” IN YOUR OPINION, BUT AECETIA WAS ABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I WAS SAYING WITHOUT TOO MUCH TROUBLE, AND ACTUALLY AGREED WITH ME (SEE POST ABOVE).
Nothing my 15-year-old teenager wouldn’t know. I’m serious, Tom. Educate me. Didn’t you graduate from Harvard? Come on, you can do better than this. FIRST, WHO IS TOM? SECOND, I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT POINT YOU’RE TRYING TO MAKE HERE. “NOTHING MY 15 YEAR OLD TEENAGER WOULDN’T KNOW” — WHAT ARE YOU REFERRING TO HERE? THIS COMMENT IS COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT. PROVIDE SOME. AND WHY IS THIS ANY OF THIS RELEVANT TO THE FACT THAT I WENT TO HARVARD? OH, I GET IT. IT GIVES YOU LICENSE TO MOCK ME BECAUSE I’M “STUPID”, RIGHT? YOU’RE “SMARTER” THAN THE PERSON WHO WENT TO HARVARD! HOPE THAT GIVES YOU SOME COMFORT. YOU APPARENTLY NEED IT.
P.S. I did miss Portluck’s allusion, so you do get points for that. By the way, those kind of comments fly by me often, it has to do with my background. However, it might be difficult for you to understand. YEAH, EVEN AFTER THAT EXPLANATION, I STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND. I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOUR BACKGROUND IS, BUT I DO AGREE THAT A LOT FLIES BY YOU.
June 12, 2008 at 5:21 PM #222234ParticipantCAPS below:
Partypup,
1) My believe my previous posts indicate, even state I know where we’re headed, a refresher course on “macroeconomics” not necessary. Check that. REALLY? IF YOU AGREE WITH MY MARCOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT, THEN WHAT IS SO “PESSISMISTIC” ABOUT WHAT I AM SAYING? EXTREMELY CURIOUS TO HEAR YOUR RESPONSE. YOUR TURN TO CHECK.
2)I haven’t whined about the burden of being black. YOU HAVEN’T EXPRESSED TO POSTERS ON THIS BOARD HOW THEY CAN’T RELATE TO OBAMA OR OTHER BLACK PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ARE WHITE AND HAVE NOT BEEN DISCRIMINATED AGAINST? YOU’RE TELLING ME THAT I’M IMAGINING THIS? CHECKED.
3) The particular term I used to describe Hillary wasn’t based on her sex. Check that. I STAND CORRECTED. IT WAS CONDELEEZA RICE TO WHOM YOU REFERRED TO AS A “LIAR” AND “SOME MAY EVEN CALL A BITCH”. NICE TO KNOW YOU FEEL EQUAL DISDAIN FOR WHITE AND BLACK WOMEN. CHECKED.
4) The fact that Hillary’s shares my party afiliation doesn’t guarantee my respect. Check that. MY COMMENT WAS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT YOU SPEAK OF PARTY UNITY, BUT YET YOU DENIGRATE ONE MEMBER OF YOUR PARTY IN ORDER TO PROMOTE ANOTHER. HOW DOES THAT SPEAK TO THE PARTY UNITY OF WHICH PORTLOCK WAS ADVOCATING? CHECKED.
5) Yes, you’ve done nothing but whine since your arrival. Check that. ??? CAN YOU PLEASE BE SPECIFIC ABOUT WHAT I’VE BEEN WHINING? OR IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK? I’M DYING TO SEE WHAT EVIDENCE YOU DIG UP HERE. SERIOUSLY. YOUR TURN TO CHECK.
Hmm, “pedestrian”, “macroeconomics”, “epithet”. Partypup, allow me to become “ghetto” on you for a moment. You’ve used some very “grand” words, but you haven’t said sh!t! YOU’VE GONE GHETTO ON ME FROM THE BEGINNING. WHAT’S NEW? AMD RATHER THAN RESPOND TO MY POINTS, YOU JUST TO WRITE THEM OFF AS “I HAVEN’T SAID SHIT.” THAT REALLY TOOK A LOT OF MENTAL EFFORT. AND BY THE WAY, YOU HAVE TO READ THE COMPLETE SENTENCES, NOT JUST THE BIG WORDS, IN ORDER TO GRASP MY MEANING. KEEP A DICTIONARY HANDY IF YOU HAVE TROUBLE GETTING THROUGH MY POSTS. I MAY NOT HAVE SAID “SHIT” IN YOUR OPINION, BUT AECETIA WAS ABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I WAS SAYING WITHOUT TOO MUCH TROUBLE, AND ACTUALLY AGREED WITH ME (SEE POST ABOVE).
Nothing my 15-year-old teenager wouldn’t know. I’m serious, Tom. Educate me. Didn’t you graduate from Harvard? Come on, you can do better than this. FIRST, WHO IS TOM? SECOND, I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT POINT YOU’RE TRYING TO MAKE HERE. “NOTHING MY 15 YEAR OLD TEENAGER WOULDN’T KNOW” — WHAT ARE YOU REFERRING TO HERE? THIS COMMENT IS COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT. PROVIDE SOME. AND WHY IS THIS ANY OF THIS RELEVANT TO THE FACT THAT I WENT TO HARVARD? OH, I GET IT. IT GIVES YOU LICENSE TO MOCK ME BECAUSE I’M “STUPID”, RIGHT? YOU’RE “SMARTER” THAN THE PERSON WHO WENT TO HARVARD! HOPE THAT GIVES YOU SOME COMFORT. YOU APPARENTLY NEED IT.
P.S. I did miss Portluck’s allusion, so you do get points for that. By the way, those kind of comments fly by me often, it has to do with my background. However, it might be difficult for you to understand. YEAH, EVEN AFTER THAT EXPLANATION, I STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND. I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOUR BACKGROUND IS, BUT I DO AGREE THAT A LOT FLIES BY YOU.
June 12, 2008 at 5:21 PM #222247ParticipantCAPS below:
Partypup,
1) My believe my previous posts indicate, even state I know where we’re headed, a refresher course on “macroeconomics” not necessary. Check that. REALLY? IF YOU AGREE WITH MY MARCOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT, THEN WHAT IS SO “PESSISMISTIC” ABOUT WHAT I AM SAYING? EXTREMELY CURIOUS TO HEAR YOUR RESPONSE. YOUR TURN TO CHECK.
2)I haven’t whined about the burden of being black. YOU HAVEN’T EXPRESSED TO POSTERS ON THIS BOARD HOW THEY CAN’T RELATE TO OBAMA OR OTHER BLACK PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ARE WHITE AND HAVE NOT BEEN DISCRIMINATED AGAINST? YOU’RE TELLING ME THAT I’M IMAGINING THIS? CHECKED.
3) The particular term I used to describe Hillary wasn’t based on her sex. Check that. I STAND CORRECTED. IT WAS CONDELEEZA RICE TO WHOM YOU REFERRED TO AS A “LIAR” AND “SOME MAY EVEN CALL A BITCH”. NICE TO KNOW YOU FEEL EQUAL DISDAIN FOR WHITE AND BLACK WOMEN. CHECKED.
4) The fact that Hillary’s shares my party afiliation doesn’t guarantee my respect. Check that. MY COMMENT WAS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT YOU SPEAK OF PARTY UNITY, BUT YET YOU DENIGRATE ONE MEMBER OF YOUR PARTY IN ORDER TO PROMOTE ANOTHER. HOW DOES THAT SPEAK TO THE PARTY UNITY OF WHICH PORTLOCK WAS ADVOCATING? CHECKED.
5) Yes, you’ve done nothing but whine since your arrival. Check that. ??? CAN YOU PLEASE BE SPECIFIC ABOUT WHAT I’VE BEEN WHINING? OR IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK? I’M DYING TO SEE WHAT EVIDENCE YOU DIG UP HERE. SERIOUSLY. YOUR TURN TO CHECK.
Hmm, “pedestrian”, “macroeconomics”, “epithet”. Partypup, allow me to become “ghetto” on you for a moment. You’ve used some very “grand” words, but you haven’t said sh!t! YOU’VE GONE GHETTO ON ME FROM THE BEGINNING. WHAT’S NEW? AMD RATHER THAN RESPOND TO MY POINTS, YOU JUST TO WRITE THEM OFF AS “I HAVEN’T SAID SHIT.” THAT REALLY TOOK A LOT OF MENTAL EFFORT. AND BY THE WAY, YOU HAVE TO READ THE COMPLETE SENTENCES, NOT JUST THE BIG WORDS, IN ORDER TO GRASP MY MEANING. KEEP A DICTIONARY HANDY IF YOU HAVE TROUBLE GETTING THROUGH MY POSTS. I MAY NOT HAVE SAID “SHIT” IN YOUR OPINION, BUT AECETIA WAS ABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I WAS SAYING WITHOUT TOO MUCH TROUBLE, AND ACTUALLY AGREED WITH ME (SEE POST ABOVE).
Nothing my 15-year-old teenager wouldn’t know. I’m serious, Tom. Educate me. Didn’t you graduate from Harvard? Come on, you can do better than this. FIRST, WHO IS TOM? SECOND, I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT POINT YOU’RE TRYING TO MAKE HERE. “NOTHING MY 15 YEAR OLD TEENAGER WOULDN’T KNOW” — WHAT ARE YOU REFERRING TO HERE? THIS COMMENT IS COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT. PROVIDE SOME. AND WHY IS THIS ANY OF THIS RELEVANT TO THE FACT THAT I WENT TO HARVARD? OH, I GET IT. IT GIVES YOU LICENSE TO MOCK ME BECAUSE I’M “STUPID”, RIGHT? YOU’RE “SMARTER” THAN THE PERSON WHO WENT TO HARVARD! HOPE THAT GIVES YOU SOME COMFORT. YOU APPARENTLY NEED IT.
P.S. I did miss Portluck’s allusion, so you do get points for that. By the way, those kind of comments fly by me often, it has to do with my background. However, it might be difficult for you to understand. YEAH, EVEN AFTER THAT EXPLANATION, I STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND. I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOUR BACKGROUND IS, BUT I DO AGREE THAT A LOT FLIES BY YOU.
June 12, 2008 at 5:21 PM #222280ParticipantCAPS below:
Partypup,
1) My believe my previous posts indicate, even state I know where we’re headed, a refresher course on “macroeconomics” not necessary. Check that. REALLY? IF YOU AGREE WITH MY MARCOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT, THEN WHAT IS SO “PESSISMISTIC” ABOUT WHAT I AM SAYING? EXTREMELY CURIOUS TO HEAR YOUR RESPONSE. YOUR TURN TO CHECK.
2)I haven’t whined about the burden of being black. YOU HAVEN’T EXPRESSED TO POSTERS ON THIS BOARD HOW THEY CAN’T RELATE TO OBAMA OR OTHER BLACK PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ARE WHITE AND HAVE NOT BEEN DISCRIMINATED AGAINST? YOU’RE TELLING ME THAT I’M IMAGINING THIS? CHECKED.
3) The particular term I used to describe Hillary wasn’t based on her sex. Check that. I STAND CORRECTED. IT WAS CONDELEEZA RICE TO WHOM YOU REFERRED TO AS A “LIAR” AND “SOME MAY EVEN CALL A BITCH”. NICE TO KNOW YOU FEEL EQUAL DISDAIN FOR WHITE AND BLACK WOMEN. CHECKED.
4) The fact that Hillary’s shares my party afiliation doesn’t guarantee my respect. Check that. MY COMMENT WAS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT YOU SPEAK OF PARTY UNITY, BUT YET YOU DENIGRATE ONE MEMBER OF YOUR PARTY IN ORDER TO PROMOTE ANOTHER. HOW DOES THAT SPEAK TO THE PARTY UNITY OF WHICH PORTLOCK WAS ADVOCATING? CHECKED.
5) Yes, you’ve done nothing but whine since your arrival. Check that. ??? CAN YOU PLEASE BE SPECIFIC ABOUT WHAT I’VE BEEN WHINING? OR IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK? I’M DYING TO SEE WHAT EVIDENCE YOU DIG UP HERE. SERIOUSLY. YOUR TURN TO CHECK.
Hmm, “pedestrian”, “macroeconomics”, “epithet”. Partypup, allow me to become “ghetto” on you for a moment. You’ve used some very “grand” words, but you haven’t said sh!t! YOU’VE GONE GHETTO ON ME FROM THE BEGINNING. WHAT’S NEW? AMD RATHER THAN RESPOND TO MY POINTS, YOU JUST TO WRITE THEM OFF AS “I HAVEN’T SAID SHIT.” THAT REALLY TOOK A LOT OF MENTAL EFFORT. AND BY THE WAY, YOU HAVE TO READ THE COMPLETE SENTENCES, NOT JUST THE BIG WORDS, IN ORDER TO GRASP MY MEANING. KEEP A DICTIONARY HANDY IF YOU HAVE TROUBLE GETTING THROUGH MY POSTS. I MAY NOT HAVE SAID “SHIT” IN YOUR OPINION, BUT AECETIA WAS ABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I WAS SAYING WITHOUT TOO MUCH TROUBLE, AND ACTUALLY AGREED WITH ME (SEE POST ABOVE).
Nothing my 15-year-old teenager wouldn’t know. I’m serious, Tom. Educate me. Didn’t you graduate from Harvard? Come on, you can do better than this. FIRST, WHO IS TOM? SECOND, I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT POINT YOU’RE TRYING TO MAKE HERE. “NOTHING MY 15 YEAR OLD TEENAGER WOULDN’T KNOW” — WHAT ARE YOU REFERRING TO HERE? THIS COMMENT IS COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT. PROVIDE SOME. AND WHY IS THIS ANY OF THIS RELEVANT TO THE FACT THAT I WENT TO HARVARD? OH, I GET IT. IT GIVES YOU LICENSE TO MOCK ME BECAUSE I’M “STUPID”, RIGHT? YOU’RE “SMARTER” THAN THE PERSON WHO WENT TO HARVARD! HOPE THAT GIVES YOU SOME COMFORT. YOU APPARENTLY NEED IT.
P.S. I did miss Portluck’s allusion, so you do get points for that. By the way, those kind of comments fly by me often, it has to do with my background. However, it might be difficult for you to understand. YEAH, EVEN AFTER THAT EXPLANATION, I STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND. I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOUR BACKGROUND IS, BUT I DO AGREE THAT A LOT FLIES BY YOU.
June 12, 2008 at 5:21 PM #222296ParticipantCAPS below:
Partypup,
1) My believe my previous posts indicate, even state I know where we’re headed, a refresher course on “macroeconomics” not necessary. Check that. REALLY? IF YOU AGREE WITH MY MARCOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT, THEN WHAT IS SO “PESSISMISTIC” ABOUT WHAT I AM SAYING? EXTREMELY CURIOUS TO HEAR YOUR RESPONSE. YOUR TURN TO CHECK.
2)I haven’t whined about the burden of being black. YOU HAVEN’T EXPRESSED TO POSTERS ON THIS BOARD HOW THEY CAN’T RELATE TO OBAMA OR OTHER BLACK PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ARE WHITE AND HAVE NOT BEEN DISCRIMINATED AGAINST? YOU’RE TELLING ME THAT I’M IMAGINING THIS? CHECKED.
3) The particular term I used to describe Hillary wasn’t based on her sex. Check that. I STAND CORRECTED. IT WAS CONDELEEZA RICE TO WHOM YOU REFERRED TO AS A “LIAR” AND “SOME MAY EVEN CALL A BITCH”. NICE TO KNOW YOU FEEL EQUAL DISDAIN FOR WHITE AND BLACK WOMEN. CHECKED.
4) The fact that Hillary’s shares my party afiliation doesn’t guarantee my respect. Check that. MY COMMENT WAS DIRECTED TO THE FACT THAT YOU SPEAK OF PARTY UNITY, BUT YET YOU DENIGRATE ONE MEMBER OF YOUR PARTY IN ORDER TO PROMOTE ANOTHER. HOW DOES THAT SPEAK TO THE PARTY UNITY OF WHICH PORTLOCK WAS ADVOCATING? CHECKED.
5) Yes, you’ve done nothing but whine since your arrival. Check that. ??? CAN YOU PLEASE BE SPECIFIC ABOUT WHAT I’VE BEEN WHINING? OR IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK? I’M DYING TO SEE WHAT EVIDENCE YOU DIG UP HERE. SERIOUSLY. YOUR TURN TO CHECK.
Hmm, “pedestrian”, “macroeconomics”, “epithet”. Partypup, allow me to become “ghetto” on you for a moment. You’ve used some very “grand” words, but you haven’t said sh!t! YOU’VE GONE GHETTO ON ME FROM THE BEGINNING. WHAT’S NEW? AMD RATHER THAN RESPOND TO MY POINTS, YOU JUST TO WRITE THEM OFF AS “I HAVEN’T SAID SHIT.” THAT REALLY TOOK A LOT OF MENTAL EFFORT. AND BY THE WAY, YOU HAVE TO READ THE COMPLETE SENTENCES, NOT JUST THE BIG WORDS, IN ORDER TO GRASP MY MEANING. KEEP A DICTIONARY HANDY IF YOU HAVE TROUBLE GETTING THROUGH MY POSTS. I MAY NOT HAVE SAID “SHIT” IN YOUR OPINION, BUT AECETIA WAS ABLE TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I WAS SAYING WITHOUT TOO MUCH TROUBLE, AND ACTUALLY AGREED WITH ME (SEE POST ABOVE).
Nothing my 15-year-old teenager wouldn’t know. I’m serious, Tom. Educate me. Didn’t you graduate from Harvard? Come on, you can do better than this. FIRST, WHO IS TOM? SECOND, I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT POINT YOU’RE TRYING TO MAKE HERE. “NOTHING MY 15 YEAR OLD TEENAGER WOULDN’T KNOW” — WHAT ARE YOU REFERRING TO HERE? THIS COMMENT IS COMPLETELY OUT OF CONTEXT. PROVIDE SOME. AND WHY IS THIS ANY OF THIS RELEVANT TO THE FACT THAT I WENT TO HARVARD? OH, I GET IT. IT GIVES YOU LICENSE TO MOCK ME BECAUSE I’M “STUPID”, RIGHT? YOU’RE “SMARTER” THAN THE PERSON WHO WENT TO HARVARD! HOPE THAT GIVES YOU SOME COMFORT. YOU APPARENTLY NEED IT.
P.S. I did miss Portluck’s allusion, so you do get points for that. By the way, those kind of comments fly by me often, it has to do with my background. However, it might be difficult for you to understand. YEAH, EVEN AFTER THAT EXPLANATION, I STILL DON’T UNDERSTAND. I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOUR BACKGROUND IS, BUT I DO AGREE THAT A LOT FLIES BY YOU.
June 16, 2008 at 9:29 AM #223036Anonymous
GuestPartypup…sigh…Here we go…
First thing, why are you screaming? Didn’t they teach you better than that at Harvard?
1) It isn’t so much your assessment (opinion) regarding the shape the country’s in and where we’re heading, it’s your approach in explaining/discussing it. Everyone knows what we’re facing, is it productive to keep whining? Your posts on the subject remind me of a broken record. Let’s hear what you’d do to FIX things, partypup? C’mon Harvard grad!
2)Ok, let’s say I expressed to a poster on here that he can’t relate to certain things Obama has experienced because he isn’t black. I simply stated a fact to support my argument, I didn’t whine about the burden of being black.
3)Your statement has no substance. I have disdain for people (Hillary in this case) who demonstrate to me that they deserve it.
4)I condemned Hillary because of her actions, not to promote Obama. That’s YOUR personal spin on it.
5) See # 1.
You’re a confused black man. From HARVARD. And it’s a sad, sad thing. Tom.
To further reiterate my point, It appears I need to become “ghetto” on you again:
“You KNOW what I know.”
Check that.
June 16, 2008 at 9:29 AM #223141GuestPartypup…sigh…Here we go…
First thing, why are you screaming? Didn’t they teach you better than that at Harvard?
1) It isn’t so much your assessment (opinion) regarding the shape the country’s in and where we’re heading, it’s your approach in explaining/discussing it. Everyone knows what we’re facing, is it productive to keep whining? Your posts on the subject remind me of a broken record. Let’s hear what you’d do to FIX things, partypup? C’mon Harvard grad!
2)Ok, let’s say I expressed to a poster on here that he can’t relate to certain things Obama has experienced because he isn’t black. I simply stated a fact to support my argument, I didn’t whine about the burden of being black.
3)Your statement has no substance. I have disdain for people (Hillary in this case) who demonstrate to me that they deserve it.
4)I condemned Hillary because of her actions, not to promote Obama. That’s YOUR personal spin on it.
5) See # 1.
You’re a confused black man. From HARVARD. And it’s a sad, sad thing. Tom.
To further reiterate my point, It appears I need to become “ghetto” on you again:
“You KNOW what I know.”
Check that.
June 16, 2008 at 9:29 AM #223153GuestPartypup…sigh…Here we go…
First thing, why are you screaming? Didn’t they teach you better than that at Harvard?
1) It isn’t so much your assessment (opinion) regarding the shape the country’s in and where we’re heading, it’s your approach in explaining/discussing it. Everyone knows what we’re facing, is it productive to keep whining? Your posts on the subject remind me of a broken record. Let’s hear what you’d do to FIX things, partypup? C’mon Harvard grad!
2)Ok, let’s say I expressed to a poster on here that he can’t relate to certain things Obama has experienced because he isn’t black. I simply stated a fact to support my argument, I didn’t whine about the burden of being black.
3)Your statement has no substance. I have disdain for people (Hillary in this case) who demonstrate to me that they deserve it.
4)I condemned Hillary because of her actions, not to promote Obama. That’s YOUR personal spin on it.
5) See # 1.
You’re a confused black man. From HARVARD. And it’s a sad, sad thing. Tom.
To further reiterate my point, It appears I need to become “ghetto” on you again:
“You KNOW what I know.”
Check that.
June 16, 2008 at 9:29 AM #223187GuestPartypup…sigh…Here we go…
First thing, why are you screaming? Didn’t they teach you better than that at Harvard?
1) It isn’t so much your assessment (opinion) regarding the shape the country’s in and where we’re heading, it’s your approach in explaining/discussing it. Everyone knows what we’re facing, is it productive to keep whining? Your posts on the subject remind me of a broken record. Let’s hear what you’d do to FIX things, partypup? C’mon Harvard grad!
2)Ok, let’s say I expressed to a poster on here that he can’t relate to certain things Obama has experienced because he isn’t black. I simply stated a fact to support my argument, I didn’t whine about the burden of being black.
3)Your statement has no substance. I have disdain for people (Hillary in this case) who demonstrate to me that they deserve it.
4)I condemned Hillary because of her actions, not to promote Obama. That’s YOUR personal spin on it.
5) See # 1.
You’re a confused black man. From HARVARD. And it’s a sad, sad thing. Tom.
To further reiterate my point, It appears I need to become “ghetto” on you again:
“You KNOW what I know.”
Check that.
June 16, 2008 at 9:29 AM #223202GuestPartypup…sigh…Here we go…
First thing, why are you screaming? Didn’t they teach you better than that at Harvard?
1) It isn’t so much your assessment (opinion) regarding the shape the country’s in and where we’re heading, it’s your approach in explaining/discussing it. Everyone knows what we’re facing, is it productive to keep whining? Your posts on the subject remind me of a broken record. Let’s hear what you’d do to FIX things, partypup? C’mon Harvard grad!
2)Ok, let’s say I expressed to a poster on here that he can’t relate to certain things Obama has experienced because he isn’t black. I simply stated a fact to support my argument, I didn’t whine about the burden of being black.
3)Your statement has no substance. I have disdain for people (Hillary in this case) who demonstrate to me that they deserve it.
4)I condemned Hillary because of her actions, not to promote Obama. That’s YOUR personal spin on it.
5) See # 1.
You’re a confused black man. From HARVARD. And it’s a sad, sad thing. Tom.
To further reiterate my point, It appears I need to become “ghetto” on you again:
“You KNOW what I know.”
Check that.
June 16, 2008 at 10:17 AM #223081Ex-SD
ParticipantPartypup: I believe that Marion is calling you an “Uncle Tom”.
It appears that anytime someone doesn’t agree with her wacky, political ideals or doesn’t drink the Obama kool-aid, she goes “ghetto” on them (her words)June 16, 2008 at 10:17 AM #223185ParticipantPartypup: I believe that Marion is calling you an “Uncle Tom”.
It appears that anytime someone doesn’t agree with her wacky, political ideals or doesn’t drink the Obama kool-aid, she goes “ghetto” on them (her words)June 16, 2008 at 10:17 AM #223198ParticipantPartypup: I believe that Marion is calling you an “Uncle Tom”.
It appears that anytime someone doesn’t agree with her wacky, political ideals or doesn’t drink the Obama kool-aid, she goes “ghetto” on them (her words)June 16, 2008 at 10:17 AM #223232ParticipantPartypup: I believe that Marion is calling you an “Uncle Tom”.
It appears that anytime someone doesn’t agree with her wacky, political ideals or doesn’t drink the Obama kool-aid, she goes “ghetto” on them (her words) -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.