- This topic has 90 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
sdduuuude.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 4, 2010 at 5:39 AM #521152March 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM #521465
Raybyrnes
ParticipantNo idea about the validity of the transaction simply looking at the same comp you are looking at and saying “that on paper looks like a good deal.” No idea if there might have been cracked slab etc.
March 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM #520684Raybyrnes
ParticipantNo idea about the validity of the transaction simply looking at the same comp you are looking at and saying “that on paper looks like a good deal.” No idea if there might have been cracked slab etc.
March 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM #520543Raybyrnes
ParticipantNo idea about the validity of the transaction simply looking at the same comp you are looking at and saying “that on paper looks like a good deal.” No idea if there might have been cracked slab etc.
March 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM #521119Raybyrnes
ParticipantNo idea about the validity of the transaction simply looking at the same comp you are looking at and saying “that on paper looks like a good deal.” No idea if there might have been cracked slab etc.
March 4, 2010 at 9:21 AM #521212Raybyrnes
ParticipantNo idea about the validity of the transaction simply looking at the same comp you are looking at and saying “that on paper looks like a good deal.” No idea if there might have been cracked slab etc.
March 4, 2010 at 9:32 AM #521470UCGal
ParticipantI’d be curious about that transaction. Not saying anything funny went on – but it strikes me as a VERY low price if the house didn’t have any serious (expensive) issues.
I’ve been seriously looking at Clairemont for multi-unit type properties (duplexes)… and they’re smaller overall square feet, same number of beds/baths… They are selling/closing higher than that. I’ve also been looking at rent in Clairemont pretty closely. Craiglist is a good way to get an idea of rents being asked… A quick check just now found that rents for 4br houses in clairemont rent for 1800-2400ish… depending in finish, whether they’re on a canyon (this one isn’t) etc.
Whoever purchased it got a good deal. But I don’t think it was a typical deal. Like I said – I’ve been tracking Clairemont. I think jpinpb has been too. I’d be curious what she thinks.
March 4, 2010 at 9:32 AM #521124UCGal
ParticipantI’d be curious about that transaction. Not saying anything funny went on – but it strikes me as a VERY low price if the house didn’t have any serious (expensive) issues.
I’ve been seriously looking at Clairemont for multi-unit type properties (duplexes)… and they’re smaller overall square feet, same number of beds/baths… They are selling/closing higher than that. I’ve also been looking at rent in Clairemont pretty closely. Craiglist is a good way to get an idea of rents being asked… A quick check just now found that rents for 4br houses in clairemont rent for 1800-2400ish… depending in finish, whether they’re on a canyon (this one isn’t) etc.
Whoever purchased it got a good deal. But I don’t think it was a typical deal. Like I said – I’ve been tracking Clairemont. I think jpinpb has been too. I’d be curious what she thinks.
March 4, 2010 at 9:32 AM #521217UCGal
ParticipantI’d be curious about that transaction. Not saying anything funny went on – but it strikes me as a VERY low price if the house didn’t have any serious (expensive) issues.
I’ve been seriously looking at Clairemont for multi-unit type properties (duplexes)… and they’re smaller overall square feet, same number of beds/baths… They are selling/closing higher than that. I’ve also been looking at rent in Clairemont pretty closely. Craiglist is a good way to get an idea of rents being asked… A quick check just now found that rents for 4br houses in clairemont rent for 1800-2400ish… depending in finish, whether they’re on a canyon (this one isn’t) etc.
Whoever purchased it got a good deal. But I don’t think it was a typical deal. Like I said – I’ve been tracking Clairemont. I think jpinpb has been too. I’d be curious what she thinks.
March 4, 2010 at 9:32 AM #520689UCGal
ParticipantI’d be curious about that transaction. Not saying anything funny went on – but it strikes me as a VERY low price if the house didn’t have any serious (expensive) issues.
I’ve been seriously looking at Clairemont for multi-unit type properties (duplexes)… and they’re smaller overall square feet, same number of beds/baths… They are selling/closing higher than that. I’ve also been looking at rent in Clairemont pretty closely. Craiglist is a good way to get an idea of rents being asked… A quick check just now found that rents for 4br houses in clairemont rent for 1800-2400ish… depending in finish, whether they’re on a canyon (this one isn’t) etc.
Whoever purchased it got a good deal. But I don’t think it was a typical deal. Like I said – I’ve been tracking Clairemont. I think jpinpb has been too. I’d be curious what she thinks.
March 4, 2010 at 9:32 AM #520548UCGal
ParticipantI’d be curious about that transaction. Not saying anything funny went on – but it strikes me as a VERY low price if the house didn’t have any serious (expensive) issues.
I’ve been seriously looking at Clairemont for multi-unit type properties (duplexes)… and they’re smaller overall square feet, same number of beds/baths… They are selling/closing higher than that. I’ve also been looking at rent in Clairemont pretty closely. Craiglist is a good way to get an idea of rents being asked… A quick check just now found that rents for 4br houses in clairemont rent for 1800-2400ish… depending in finish, whether they’re on a canyon (this one isn’t) etc.
Whoever purchased it got a good deal. But I don’t think it was a typical deal. Like I said – I’ve been tracking Clairemont. I think jpinpb has been too. I’d be curious what she thinks.
March 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM #521129sdrealtor
ParticipantThat is way too low for a house like that. I was not in the MLS and was likely a transaction between related parties. It will likley get assessed at market value. I wouldnt give that transaction a second look as it clearly is not an arms length transaction.
March 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM #521474sdrealtor
ParticipantThat is way too low for a house like that. I was not in the MLS and was likely a transaction between related parties. It will likley get assessed at market value. I wouldnt give that transaction a second look as it clearly is not an arms length transaction.
March 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM #521222sdrealtor
ParticipantThat is way too low for a house like that. I was not in the MLS and was likely a transaction between related parties. It will likley get assessed at market value. I wouldnt give that transaction a second look as it clearly is not an arms length transaction.
March 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM #520693sdrealtor
ParticipantThat is way too low for a house like that. I was not in the MLS and was likely a transaction between related parties. It will likley get assessed at market value. I wouldnt give that transaction a second look as it clearly is not an arms length transaction.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.