Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Chamberlin’s latest gem
- This topic has 80 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by cr.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 7, 2008 at 11:50 PM #166270March 8, 2008 at 3:14 AM #166372Rich ToscanoKeymaster
I responded to that bit of utter nonsense too:
http://voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2007/08/16/toscano/888conspiracytheory081607.txt
I’m done with Chamberlin though… debunking his ongoing stream of irresponsible misinformation could become a full time job and there are better uses of my time. Anyone who still reads him and takes him seriously after the last column, in which he made clear that he doesn’t even understand a simple concept like the effects of inflation, deserves the bad advice they are getting.
Feel free to document his ongoing pearls of wisdom in the forums but I’m letting my SDDT subscription lapse and I will no longer subject myself to the psychic pain of reading his “money in the morning” column every day.
March 8, 2008 at 3:14 AM #166274Rich ToscanoKeymasterI responded to that bit of utter nonsense too:
http://voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2007/08/16/toscano/888conspiracytheory081607.txt
I’m done with Chamberlin though… debunking his ongoing stream of irresponsible misinformation could become a full time job and there are better uses of my time. Anyone who still reads him and takes him seriously after the last column, in which he made clear that he doesn’t even understand a simple concept like the effects of inflation, deserves the bad advice they are getting.
Feel free to document his ongoing pearls of wisdom in the forums but I’m letting my SDDT subscription lapse and I will no longer subject myself to the psychic pain of reading his “money in the morning” column every day.
March 8, 2008 at 3:14 AM #165955Rich ToscanoKeymasterI responded to that bit of utter nonsense too:
http://voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2007/08/16/toscano/888conspiracytheory081607.txt
I’m done with Chamberlin though… debunking his ongoing stream of irresponsible misinformation could become a full time job and there are better uses of my time. Anyone who still reads him and takes him seriously after the last column, in which he made clear that he doesn’t even understand a simple concept like the effects of inflation, deserves the bad advice they are getting.
Feel free to document his ongoing pearls of wisdom in the forums but I’m letting my SDDT subscription lapse and I will no longer subject myself to the psychic pain of reading his “money in the morning” column every day.
March 8, 2008 at 3:14 AM #166285Rich ToscanoKeymasterI responded to that bit of utter nonsense too:
http://voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2007/08/16/toscano/888conspiracytheory081607.txt
I’m done with Chamberlin though… debunking his ongoing stream of irresponsible misinformation could become a full time job and there are better uses of my time. Anyone who still reads him and takes him seriously after the last column, in which he made clear that he doesn’t even understand a simple concept like the effects of inflation, deserves the bad advice they are getting.
Feel free to document his ongoing pearls of wisdom in the forums but I’m letting my SDDT subscription lapse and I will no longer subject myself to the psychic pain of reading his “money in the morning” column every day.
March 8, 2008 at 3:14 AM #166281Rich ToscanoKeymasterI responded to that bit of utter nonsense too:
http://voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2007/08/16/toscano/888conspiracytheory081607.txt
I’m done with Chamberlin though… debunking his ongoing stream of irresponsible misinformation could become a full time job and there are better uses of my time. Anyone who still reads him and takes him seriously after the last column, in which he made clear that he doesn’t even understand a simple concept like the effects of inflation, deserves the bad advice they are getting.
Feel free to document his ongoing pearls of wisdom in the forums but I’m letting my SDDT subscription lapse and I will no longer subject myself to the psychic pain of reading his “money in the morning” column every day.
March 8, 2008 at 4:03 AM #166289gdcoxParticipantGraham
Just one more Rich..
‘Wealth soared for the average Zimbabwean as the stock market was the best performing in the world: up 12,000 per cent over 12 months.
Sure, there were a few negatives in the report such as GDP per capita having fallen back by more than 40 per cent and something called hyper-inflation but there was also plenty of good news……………….’.
———————————————————-
(FT derived.March 8, 2008 at 4:03 AM #165961gdcoxParticipantGraham
Just one more Rich..
‘Wealth soared for the average Zimbabwean as the stock market was the best performing in the world: up 12,000 per cent over 12 months.
Sure, there were a few negatives in the report such as GDP per capita having fallen back by more than 40 per cent and something called hyper-inflation but there was also plenty of good news……………….’.
———————————————————-
(FT derived.March 8, 2008 at 4:03 AM #166286gdcoxParticipantGraham
Just one more Rich..
‘Wealth soared for the average Zimbabwean as the stock market was the best performing in the world: up 12,000 per cent over 12 months.
Sure, there were a few negatives in the report such as GDP per capita having fallen back by more than 40 per cent and something called hyper-inflation but there was also plenty of good news……………….’.
———————————————————-
(FT derived.March 8, 2008 at 4:03 AM #166377gdcoxParticipantGraham
Just one more Rich..
‘Wealth soared for the average Zimbabwean as the stock market was the best performing in the world: up 12,000 per cent over 12 months.
Sure, there were a few negatives in the report such as GDP per capita having fallen back by more than 40 per cent and something called hyper-inflation but there was also plenty of good news……………….’.
———————————————————-
(FT derived.March 8, 2008 at 4:03 AM #166279gdcoxParticipantGraham
Just one more Rich..
‘Wealth soared for the average Zimbabwean as the stock market was the best performing in the world: up 12,000 per cent over 12 months.
Sure, there were a few negatives in the report such as GDP per capita having fallen back by more than 40 per cent and something called hyper-inflation but there was also plenty of good news……………….’.
———————————————————-
(FT derived.March 8, 2008 at 7:20 AM #166299ocrenterParticipantAfter the effects of 4.1% inflation are included, real net worth fell for the year.
where did marketwatch get that number?
http://www.miseryindex.us/irbyyear.asp
the number for 2007 is 2.85%, and according to
http://inflationdata.com/, they got the number from the consumer price index, not from the core inflation number which excludes food and gas.
March 8, 2008 at 7:20 AM #166306ocrenterParticipantAfter the effects of 4.1% inflation are included, real net worth fell for the year.
where did marketwatch get that number?
http://www.miseryindex.us/irbyyear.asp
the number for 2007 is 2.85%, and according to
http://inflationdata.com/, they got the number from the consumer price index, not from the core inflation number which excludes food and gas.
March 8, 2008 at 7:20 AM #166310ocrenterParticipantAfter the effects of 4.1% inflation are included, real net worth fell for the year.
where did marketwatch get that number?
http://www.miseryindex.us/irbyyear.asp
the number for 2007 is 2.85%, and according to
http://inflationdata.com/, they got the number from the consumer price index, not from the core inflation number which excludes food and gas.
March 8, 2008 at 7:20 AM #166397ocrenterParticipantAfter the effects of 4.1% inflation are included, real net worth fell for the year.
where did marketwatch get that number?
http://www.miseryindex.us/irbyyear.asp
the number for 2007 is 2.85%, and according to
http://inflationdata.com/, they got the number from the consumer price index, not from the core inflation number which excludes food and gas.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.