- This topic has 190 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 27, 2007 at 6:07 PM #125442December 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM #125190AnonymousGuest
Interesting stuff. I wonder why the southern areas are being hit so hard. I’ve been playing around with the Case Shiller stats as well and have a couple questions; if you don’t mind I’d like to exchange emails. You can reach me at [email protected] – feel free to email me so you don’t have to post yours publicly.
December 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM #125344AnonymousGuestInteresting stuff. I wonder why the southern areas are being hit so hard. I’ve been playing around with the Case Shiller stats as well and have a couple questions; if you don’t mind I’d like to exchange emails. You can reach me at [email protected] – feel free to email me so you don’t have to post yours publicly.
December 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM #125362AnonymousGuestInteresting stuff. I wonder why the southern areas are being hit so hard. I’ve been playing around with the Case Shiller stats as well and have a couple questions; if you don’t mind I’d like to exchange emails. You can reach me at [email protected] – feel free to email me so you don’t have to post yours publicly.
December 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM #125421AnonymousGuestInteresting stuff. I wonder why the southern areas are being hit so hard. I’ve been playing around with the Case Shiller stats as well and have a couple questions; if you don’t mind I’d like to exchange emails. You can reach me at [email protected] – feel free to email me so you don’t have to post yours publicly.
December 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM #125448AnonymousGuestInteresting stuff. I wonder why the southern areas are being hit so hard. I’ve been playing around with the Case Shiller stats as well and have a couple questions; if you don’t mind I’d like to exchange emails. You can reach me at [email protected] – feel free to email me so you don’t have to post yours publicly.
December 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM #125405zkParticipantesmith,
That is really great stuff. Did you happen to do one for 92130 by itself?
December 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM #125558zkParticipantesmith,
That is really great stuff. Did you happen to do one for 92130 by itself?
December 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM #125576zkParticipantesmith,
That is really great stuff. Did you happen to do one for 92130 by itself?
December 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM #125637zkParticipantesmith,
That is really great stuff. Did you happen to do one for 92130 by itself?
December 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM #125663zkParticipantesmith,
That is really great stuff. Did you happen to do one for 92130 by itself?
December 29, 2007 at 5:38 AM #126025EugeneParticipantAll right, more numbers and more food for thought.
[img_assist|nid=5993|title=all neighborhoods|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=418]
These are the averages for the 2nd half of 2007.
On one hand, a lot of denial and highly overpriced markets all along the coast. Poorer areas are getting hammered.
On the other hand, two areas with the least amount of appreciation since 2000 are Carmel Valley and Scripps Ranch. Chula Vista and National City are still extremely overpriced despite 20% declines.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Click on the graph, there should be a link called “original”.
December 29, 2007 at 5:38 AM #126181EugeneParticipantAll right, more numbers and more food for thought.
[img_assist|nid=5993|title=all neighborhoods|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=418]
These are the averages for the 2nd half of 2007.
On one hand, a lot of denial and highly overpriced markets all along the coast. Poorer areas are getting hammered.
On the other hand, two areas with the least amount of appreciation since 2000 are Carmel Valley and Scripps Ranch. Chula Vista and National City are still extremely overpriced despite 20% declines.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Click on the graph, there should be a link called “original”.
December 29, 2007 at 5:38 AM #126193EugeneParticipantAll right, more numbers and more food for thought.
[img_assist|nid=5993|title=all neighborhoods|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=418]
These are the averages for the 2nd half of 2007.
On one hand, a lot of denial and highly overpriced markets all along the coast. Poorer areas are getting hammered.
On the other hand, two areas with the least amount of appreciation since 2000 are Carmel Valley and Scripps Ranch. Chula Vista and National City are still extremely overpriced despite 20% declines.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Click on the graph, there should be a link called “original”.
December 29, 2007 at 5:38 AM #126259EugeneParticipantAll right, more numbers and more food for thought.
[img_assist|nid=5993|title=all neighborhoods|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=418]
These are the averages for the 2nd half of 2007.
On one hand, a lot of denial and highly overpriced markets all along the coast. Poorer areas are getting hammered.
On the other hand, two areas with the least amount of appreciation since 2000 are Carmel Valley and Scripps Ranch. Chula Vista and National City are still extremely overpriced despite 20% declines.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Click on the graph, there should be a link called “original”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.