- This topic has 190 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by
Eugene.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 27, 2007 at 6:07 PM #125442December 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM #125190
Anonymous
GuestInteresting stuff. I wonder why the southern areas are being hit so hard. I’ve been playing around with the Case Shiller stats as well and have a couple questions; if you don’t mind I’d like to exchange emails. You can reach me at ashersd@gmail.com – feel free to email me so you don’t have to post yours publicly.
December 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM #125344Anonymous
GuestInteresting stuff. I wonder why the southern areas are being hit so hard. I’ve been playing around with the Case Shiller stats as well and have a couple questions; if you don’t mind I’d like to exchange emails. You can reach me at ashersd@gmail.com – feel free to email me so you don’t have to post yours publicly.
December 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM #125362Anonymous
GuestInteresting stuff. I wonder why the southern areas are being hit so hard. I’ve been playing around with the Case Shiller stats as well and have a couple questions; if you don’t mind I’d like to exchange emails. You can reach me at ashersd@gmail.com – feel free to email me so you don’t have to post yours publicly.
December 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM #125421Anonymous
GuestInteresting stuff. I wonder why the southern areas are being hit so hard. I’ve been playing around with the Case Shiller stats as well and have a couple questions; if you don’t mind I’d like to exchange emails. You can reach me at ashersd@gmail.com – feel free to email me so you don’t have to post yours publicly.
December 27, 2007 at 6:08 PM #125448Anonymous
GuestInteresting stuff. I wonder why the southern areas are being hit so hard. I’ve been playing around with the Case Shiller stats as well and have a couple questions; if you don’t mind I’d like to exchange emails. You can reach me at ashersd@gmail.com – feel free to email me so you don’t have to post yours publicly.
December 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM #125405zk
Participantesmith,
That is really great stuff. Did you happen to do one for 92130 by itself?
December 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM #125558zk
Participantesmith,
That is really great stuff. Did you happen to do one for 92130 by itself?
December 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM #125576zk
Participantesmith,
That is really great stuff. Did you happen to do one for 92130 by itself?
December 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM #125637zk
Participantesmith,
That is really great stuff. Did you happen to do one for 92130 by itself?
December 27, 2007 at 10:27 PM #125663zk
Participantesmith,
That is really great stuff. Did you happen to do one for 92130 by itself?
December 29, 2007 at 5:38 AM #126025Eugene
ParticipantAll right, more numbers and more food for thought.
[img_assist|nid=5993|title=all neighborhoods|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=418]
These are the averages for the 2nd half of 2007.
On one hand, a lot of denial and highly overpriced markets all along the coast. Poorer areas are getting hammered.
On the other hand, two areas with the least amount of appreciation since 2000 are Carmel Valley and Scripps Ranch. Chula Vista and National City are still extremely overpriced despite 20% declines.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Click on the graph, there should be a link called “original”.
December 29, 2007 at 5:38 AM #126181Eugene
ParticipantAll right, more numbers and more food for thought.
[img_assist|nid=5993|title=all neighborhoods|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=418]
These are the averages for the 2nd half of 2007.
On one hand, a lot of denial and highly overpriced markets all along the coast. Poorer areas are getting hammered.
On the other hand, two areas with the least amount of appreciation since 2000 are Carmel Valley and Scripps Ranch. Chula Vista and National City are still extremely overpriced despite 20% declines.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Click on the graph, there should be a link called “original”.
December 29, 2007 at 5:38 AM #126193Eugene
ParticipantAll right, more numbers and more food for thought.
[img_assist|nid=5993|title=all neighborhoods|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=418]
These are the averages for the 2nd half of 2007.
On one hand, a lot of denial and highly overpriced markets all along the coast. Poorer areas are getting hammered.
On the other hand, two areas with the least amount of appreciation since 2000 are Carmel Valley and Scripps Ranch. Chula Vista and National City are still extremely overpriced despite 20% declines.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Click on the graph, there should be a link called “original”.
December 29, 2007 at 5:38 AM #126259Eugene
ParticipantAll right, more numbers and more food for thought.
[img_assist|nid=5993|title=all neighborhoods|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=466|height=418]
These are the averages for the 2nd half of 2007.
On one hand, a lot of denial and highly overpriced markets all along the coast. Poorer areas are getting hammered.
On the other hand, two areas with the least amount of appreciation since 2000 are Carmel Valley and Scripps Ranch. Chula Vista and National City are still extremely overpriced despite 20% declines.
is there a way to see a bigger graph?
Click on the graph, there should be a link called “original”.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.