- This topic has 145 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 7 months ago by jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 15, 2008 at 8:29 AM #204718May 15, 2008 at 8:45 AM #204622SDEngineerParticipant
Just looking at the chart surveyor posted. The “V” shaped recovery there (in housing starts) occurred in 1991-1992.
But prices continued to fall (in real – not inflationary adjusted – dollars) until sometime around 1996 or 1997.
As another poster pointed out, the bottom of the housing construction sector (to economists anyway) doesn’t necessarily result in a pricing rebound (and indeed, from previous examples, doesn’t even mean prices will stabilize).
Edit: beaten to the punch by sdrealtor lol
May 15, 2008 at 8:45 AM #204670SDEngineerParticipantJust looking at the chart surveyor posted. The “V” shaped recovery there (in housing starts) occurred in 1991-1992.
But prices continued to fall (in real – not inflationary adjusted – dollars) until sometime around 1996 or 1997.
As another poster pointed out, the bottom of the housing construction sector (to economists anyway) doesn’t necessarily result in a pricing rebound (and indeed, from previous examples, doesn’t even mean prices will stabilize).
Edit: beaten to the punch by sdrealtor lol
May 15, 2008 at 8:45 AM #204699SDEngineerParticipantJust looking at the chart surveyor posted. The “V” shaped recovery there (in housing starts) occurred in 1991-1992.
But prices continued to fall (in real – not inflationary adjusted – dollars) until sometime around 1996 or 1997.
As another poster pointed out, the bottom of the housing construction sector (to economists anyway) doesn’t necessarily result in a pricing rebound (and indeed, from previous examples, doesn’t even mean prices will stabilize).
Edit: beaten to the punch by sdrealtor lol
May 15, 2008 at 8:45 AM #204721SDEngineerParticipantJust looking at the chart surveyor posted. The “V” shaped recovery there (in housing starts) occurred in 1991-1992.
But prices continued to fall (in real – not inflationary adjusted – dollars) until sometime around 1996 or 1997.
As another poster pointed out, the bottom of the housing construction sector (to economists anyway) doesn’t necessarily result in a pricing rebound (and indeed, from previous examples, doesn’t even mean prices will stabilize).
Edit: beaten to the punch by sdrealtor lol
May 15, 2008 at 8:45 AM #204755SDEngineerParticipantJust looking at the chart surveyor posted. The “V” shaped recovery there (in housing starts) occurred in 1991-1992.
But prices continued to fall (in real – not inflationary adjusted – dollars) until sometime around 1996 or 1997.
As another poster pointed out, the bottom of the housing construction sector (to economists anyway) doesn’t necessarily result in a pricing rebound (and indeed, from previous examples, doesn’t even mean prices will stabilize).
Edit: beaten to the punch by sdrealtor lol
May 15, 2008 at 9:29 AM #204652surveyorParticipantcharts
I don’t interpret the chart to mean that we are at the “cheapest” prices for real estate right now or soon. However, in the larger economic environment, the possibility that housing starts will begin to go up bodes well at least for the economy, because maybe it will start generating more jobs, more jobs means more money, more money means people spending it, etc. etc. Whether the chart indicates higher housing prices in the Scripps Ranch zip code 92131, I doubt it.
I myself am starting to see the beginnings of the housing starts. We are seeing dead projects being bought up and springing back to life. Soon, they will start actually building again, hiring more people.
May 15, 2008 at 9:29 AM #204700surveyorParticipantcharts
I don’t interpret the chart to mean that we are at the “cheapest” prices for real estate right now or soon. However, in the larger economic environment, the possibility that housing starts will begin to go up bodes well at least for the economy, because maybe it will start generating more jobs, more jobs means more money, more money means people spending it, etc. etc. Whether the chart indicates higher housing prices in the Scripps Ranch zip code 92131, I doubt it.
I myself am starting to see the beginnings of the housing starts. We are seeing dead projects being bought up and springing back to life. Soon, they will start actually building again, hiring more people.
May 15, 2008 at 9:29 AM #204730surveyorParticipantcharts
I don’t interpret the chart to mean that we are at the “cheapest” prices for real estate right now or soon. However, in the larger economic environment, the possibility that housing starts will begin to go up bodes well at least for the economy, because maybe it will start generating more jobs, more jobs means more money, more money means people spending it, etc. etc. Whether the chart indicates higher housing prices in the Scripps Ranch zip code 92131, I doubt it.
I myself am starting to see the beginnings of the housing starts. We are seeing dead projects being bought up and springing back to life. Soon, they will start actually building again, hiring more people.
May 15, 2008 at 9:29 AM #204751surveyorParticipantcharts
I don’t interpret the chart to mean that we are at the “cheapest” prices for real estate right now or soon. However, in the larger economic environment, the possibility that housing starts will begin to go up bodes well at least for the economy, because maybe it will start generating more jobs, more jobs means more money, more money means people spending it, etc. etc. Whether the chart indicates higher housing prices in the Scripps Ranch zip code 92131, I doubt it.
I myself am starting to see the beginnings of the housing starts. We are seeing dead projects being bought up and springing back to life. Soon, they will start actually building again, hiring more people.
May 15, 2008 at 9:29 AM #204785surveyorParticipantcharts
I don’t interpret the chart to mean that we are at the “cheapest” prices for real estate right now or soon. However, in the larger economic environment, the possibility that housing starts will begin to go up bodes well at least for the economy, because maybe it will start generating more jobs, more jobs means more money, more money means people spending it, etc. etc. Whether the chart indicates higher housing prices in the Scripps Ranch zip code 92131, I doubt it.
I myself am starting to see the beginnings of the housing starts. We are seeing dead projects being bought up and springing back to life. Soon, they will start actually building again, hiring more people.
May 15, 2008 at 10:21 AM #204667anParticipantsurveyor, can you elaborate more on this?
I myself am starting to see the beginnings of the housing starts. We are seeing dead projects being bought up and springing back to life. Soon, they will start actually building again, hiring more people.
Do you see anything in the North County coming back to life? To me, the only good deals out there are either from builders or REO. Since new housing stock are mostly large SFR or small condo/townhouse, there’s really no option for something who are looking for a modest 1500-2000 sq-ft SFR.
May 15, 2008 at 10:21 AM #204714anParticipantsurveyor, can you elaborate more on this?
I myself am starting to see the beginnings of the housing starts. We are seeing dead projects being bought up and springing back to life. Soon, they will start actually building again, hiring more people.
Do you see anything in the North County coming back to life? To me, the only good deals out there are either from builders or REO. Since new housing stock are mostly large SFR or small condo/townhouse, there’s really no option for something who are looking for a modest 1500-2000 sq-ft SFR.
May 15, 2008 at 10:21 AM #204743anParticipantsurveyor, can you elaborate more on this?
I myself am starting to see the beginnings of the housing starts. We are seeing dead projects being bought up and springing back to life. Soon, they will start actually building again, hiring more people.
Do you see anything in the North County coming back to life? To me, the only good deals out there are either from builders or REO. Since new housing stock are mostly large SFR or small condo/townhouse, there’s really no option for something who are looking for a modest 1500-2000 sq-ft SFR.
May 15, 2008 at 10:21 AM #204766anParticipantsurveyor, can you elaborate more on this?
I myself am starting to see the beginnings of the housing starts. We are seeing dead projects being bought up and springing back to life. Soon, they will start actually building again, hiring more people.
Do you see anything in the North County coming back to life? To me, the only good deals out there are either from builders or REO. Since new housing stock are mostly large SFR or small condo/townhouse, there’s really no option for something who are looking for a modest 1500-2000 sq-ft SFR.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.