- This topic has 30 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by
cyphire.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 20, 2007 at 5:31 PM #10961November 20, 2007 at 5:55 PM #102079
zk
ParticipantAll it takes is one chump with a bad real estate agent to pay way too much for a property. And we all know there are plenty of chumps and plenty of bad real estate agents out there. Over the last year or so, and especially the last few months, even most of the chumps have been educated. Obviously not all of them, though.
November 20, 2007 at 5:55 PM #102161zk
ParticipantAll it takes is one chump with a bad real estate agent to pay way too much for a property. And we all know there are plenty of chumps and plenty of bad real estate agents out there. Over the last year or so, and especially the last few months, even most of the chumps have been educated. Obviously not all of them, though.
November 20, 2007 at 5:55 PM #102170zk
ParticipantAll it takes is one chump with a bad real estate agent to pay way too much for a property. And we all know there are plenty of chumps and plenty of bad real estate agents out there. Over the last year or so, and especially the last few months, even most of the chumps have been educated. Obviously not all of them, though.
November 20, 2007 at 5:55 PM #102222zk
ParticipantAll it takes is one chump with a bad real estate agent to pay way too much for a property. And we all know there are plenty of chumps and plenty of bad real estate agents out there. Over the last year or so, and especially the last few months, even most of the chumps have been educated. Obviously not all of them, though.
November 20, 2007 at 5:55 PM #102194zk
ParticipantAll it takes is one chump with a bad real estate agent to pay way too much for a property. And we all know there are plenty of chumps and plenty of bad real estate agents out there. Over the last year or so, and especially the last few months, even most of the chumps have been educated. Obviously not all of them, though.
November 20, 2007 at 7:23 PM #1022194runner
ParticipantWell, they’re not making any more land in Carmel Valley, you know.
November 20, 2007 at 7:23 PM #1022474runner
ParticipantWell, they’re not making any more land in Carmel Valley, you know.
November 20, 2007 at 7:23 PM #1021954runner
ParticipantWell, they’re not making any more land in Carmel Valley, you know.
November 20, 2007 at 7:23 PM #1021864runner
ParticipantWell, they’re not making any more land in Carmel Valley, you know.
November 20, 2007 at 7:23 PM #1021064runner
ParticipantWell, they’re not making any more land in Carmel Valley, you know.
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102193cyphire
ParticipantNot sure if this is the case, but it would be possible that the house was updated. Lots of houses in Carmel Valley get new kitchens, new wood floors, etc. Perhaps a flipper updated the house and then tried to get their money back out of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case.
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102271cyphire
ParticipantNot sure if this is the case, but it would be possible that the house was updated. Lots of houses in Carmel Valley get new kitchens, new wood floors, etc. Perhaps a flipper updated the house and then tried to get their money back out of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case.
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102281cyphire
ParticipantNot sure if this is the case, but it would be possible that the house was updated. Lots of houses in Carmel Valley get new kitchens, new wood floors, etc. Perhaps a flipper updated the house and then tried to get their money back out of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case.
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102304cyphire
ParticipantNot sure if this is the case, but it would be possible that the house was updated. Lots of houses in Carmel Valley get new kitchens, new wood floors, etc. Perhaps a flipper updated the house and then tried to get their money back out of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.