- This topic has 30 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
cyphire.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
November 20, 2007 at 5:31 PM #10961
-
November 20, 2007 at 5:55 PM #102079
zk
ParticipantAll it takes is one chump with a bad real estate agent to pay way too much for a property. And we all know there are plenty of chumps and plenty of bad real estate agents out there. Over the last year or so, and especially the last few months, even most of the chumps have been educated. Obviously not all of them, though.
-
November 20, 2007 at 5:55 PM #102161
zk
ParticipantAll it takes is one chump with a bad real estate agent to pay way too much for a property. And we all know there are plenty of chumps and plenty of bad real estate agents out there. Over the last year or so, and especially the last few months, even most of the chumps have been educated. Obviously not all of them, though.
-
November 20, 2007 at 5:55 PM #102170
zk
ParticipantAll it takes is one chump with a bad real estate agent to pay way too much for a property. And we all know there are plenty of chumps and plenty of bad real estate agents out there. Over the last year or so, and especially the last few months, even most of the chumps have been educated. Obviously not all of them, though.
-
November 20, 2007 at 5:55 PM #102194
zk
ParticipantAll it takes is one chump with a bad real estate agent to pay way too much for a property. And we all know there are plenty of chumps and plenty of bad real estate agents out there. Over the last year or so, and especially the last few months, even most of the chumps have been educated. Obviously not all of them, though.
-
November 20, 2007 at 5:55 PM #102222
zk
ParticipantAll it takes is one chump with a bad real estate agent to pay way too much for a property. And we all know there are plenty of chumps and plenty of bad real estate agents out there. Over the last year or so, and especially the last few months, even most of the chumps have been educated. Obviously not all of them, though.
-
November 20, 2007 at 7:23 PM #102106
4runner
ParticipantWell, they’re not making any more land in Carmel Valley, you know.
-
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102193
cyphire
ParticipantNot sure if this is the case, but it would be possible that the house was updated. Lots of houses in Carmel Valley get new kitchens, new wood floors, etc. Perhaps a flipper updated the house and then tried to get their money back out of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case.
-
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102271
cyphire
ParticipantNot sure if this is the case, but it would be possible that the house was updated. Lots of houses in Carmel Valley get new kitchens, new wood floors, etc. Perhaps a flipper updated the house and then tried to get their money back out of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case.
-
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102281
cyphire
ParticipantNot sure if this is the case, but it would be possible that the house was updated. Lots of houses in Carmel Valley get new kitchens, new wood floors, etc. Perhaps a flipper updated the house and then tried to get their money back out of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case.
-
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102304
cyphire
ParticipantNot sure if this is the case, but it would be possible that the house was updated. Lots of houses in Carmel Valley get new kitchens, new wood floors, etc. Perhaps a flipper updated the house and then tried to get their money back out of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case.
-
November 20, 2007 at 10:07 PM #102332
cyphire
ParticipantNot sure if this is the case, but it would be possible that the house was updated. Lots of houses in Carmel Valley get new kitchens, new wood floors, etc. Perhaps a flipper updated the house and then tried to get their money back out of it. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was the case.
-
-
November 20, 2007 at 7:23 PM #102186
4runner
ParticipantWell, they’re not making any more land in Carmel Valley, you know.
-
November 20, 2007 at 7:23 PM #102195
4runner
ParticipantWell, they’re not making any more land in Carmel Valley, you know.
-
November 20, 2007 at 7:23 PM #102219
4runner
ParticipantWell, they’re not making any more land in Carmel Valley, you know.
-
November 20, 2007 at 7:23 PM #102247
4runner
ParticipantWell, they’re not making any more land in Carmel Valley, you know.
-
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102308
Coronita
ParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102432
Arty
ParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102509
Arty
ParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102521
Arty
ParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102545
Arty
ParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
-
November 21, 2007 at 9:57 AM #102574
Arty
ParticipantAs long as is not 100% financed, it is cool with me. I mean it is their money and the down turn in price will eat their 20% (hopefully) down payment.
-
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102437
cyphire
ParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
-
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102514
cyphire
ParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
-
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102526
cyphire
ParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
-
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102550
cyphire
ParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
-
November 21, 2007 at 10:03 AM #102579
cyphire
ParticipantI’m not suggesting it was a ‘successful’ flip! I just mean the timing is right, where a flipper might have still thought that the market was ripe for another flip, bought the house, did the renovations, and then found out they couldn’t get their costs back. I’m sure that if work was done on the house, they needed to get their equity back out, irregardless of the economics of their flip!
-
-
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102384
Coronita
ParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
-
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102396
Coronita
ParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
-
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102420
Coronita
ParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
-
November 21, 2007 at 6:17 AM #102448
Coronita
ParticipantNot much of a flip if you factor in agent fees, taxes, and mortgage.
Perhaps an over-leveraged person found a knife catcher?
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.