- This topic has 335 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 28, 2009 at 12:57 AM #389283April 28, 2009 at 6:13 AM #388667Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant
[quote=temeculaguy]Then you name the time frame, but name it now, that’s the thing with predictions, you don’t get to name them afterwards. You can’t say “things will be bad”, not quantify or define “bad” and then later say you were right.
[/quote]
Actually I agree with you that we probably hit bottom in February 2009 (For T.V.).
But this Flu thing could make things iffy in the short term,But this at least gives the WHO time to come up with a vaccine by next flu season so maybe it was good timing for this to come now instead of next December.
But wait who’s on first, WHAT, WHO!!, yes he on first…
April 28, 2009 at 6:13 AM #388930Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Then you name the time frame, but name it now, that’s the thing with predictions, you don’t get to name them afterwards. You can’t say “things will be bad”, not quantify or define “bad” and then later say you were right.
[/quote]
Actually I agree with you that we probably hit bottom in February 2009 (For T.V.).
But this Flu thing could make things iffy in the short term,But this at least gives the WHO time to come up with a vaccine by next flu season so maybe it was good timing for this to come now instead of next December.
But wait who’s on first, WHAT, WHO!!, yes he on first…
April 28, 2009 at 6:13 AM #389131Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Then you name the time frame, but name it now, that’s the thing with predictions, you don’t get to name them afterwards. You can’t say “things will be bad”, not quantify or define “bad” and then later say you were right.
[/quote]
Actually I agree with you that we probably hit bottom in February 2009 (For T.V.).
But this Flu thing could make things iffy in the short term,But this at least gives the WHO time to come up with a vaccine by next flu season so maybe it was good timing for this to come now instead of next December.
But wait who’s on first, WHAT, WHO!!, yes he on first…
April 28, 2009 at 6:13 AM #389183Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Then you name the time frame, but name it now, that’s the thing with predictions, you don’t get to name them afterwards. You can’t say “things will be bad”, not quantify or define “bad” and then later say you were right.
[/quote]
Actually I agree with you that we probably hit bottom in February 2009 (For T.V.).
But this Flu thing could make things iffy in the short term,But this at least gives the WHO time to come up with a vaccine by next flu season so maybe it was good timing for this to come now instead of next December.
But wait who’s on first, WHAT, WHO!!, yes he on first…
April 28, 2009 at 6:13 AM #389323Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=temeculaguy]Then you name the time frame, but name it now, that’s the thing with predictions, you don’t get to name them afterwards. You can’t say “things will be bad”, not quantify or define “bad” and then later say you were right.
[/quote]
Actually I agree with you that we probably hit bottom in February 2009 (For T.V.).
But this Flu thing could make things iffy in the short term,But this at least gives the WHO time to come up with a vaccine by next flu season so maybe it was good timing for this to come now instead of next December.
But wait who’s on first, WHAT, WHO!!, yes he on first…
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.