Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Calling All Piggington Lawyers
- This topic has 20 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by
4plexowner.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 8, 2009 at 10:29 AM #15846June 8, 2009 at 10:35 AM #412207
4plexowner
Participantthe rule of law is long gone in this country
June 8, 2009 at 10:35 AM #4124424plexowner
Participantthe rule of law is long gone in this country
June 8, 2009 at 10:35 AM #4129064plexowner
Participantthe rule of law is long gone in this country
June 8, 2009 at 10:35 AM #4126894plexowner
Participantthe rule of law is long gone in this country
June 8, 2009 at 10:35 AM #4127564plexowner
Participantthe rule of law is long gone in this country
June 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM #4122124plexowner
ParticipantCheney backpedals on earlier claims
~
Cheney has now acknowledged that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 – think there will be any legal action taken related to starting an illegal war against a sovereign nation?
June 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM #4124474plexowner
ParticipantCheney backpedals on earlier claims
~
Cheney has now acknowledged that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 – think there will be any legal action taken related to starting an illegal war against a sovereign nation?
June 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM #4129114plexowner
ParticipantCheney backpedals on earlier claims
~
Cheney has now acknowledged that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 – think there will be any legal action taken related to starting an illegal war against a sovereign nation?
June 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM #4126944plexowner
ParticipantCheney backpedals on earlier claims
~
Cheney has now acknowledged that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 – think there will be any legal action taken related to starting an illegal war against a sovereign nation?
June 8, 2009 at 10:37 AM #4127614plexowner
ParticipantCheney backpedals on earlier claims
~
Cheney has now acknowledged that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 – think there will be any legal action taken related to starting an illegal war against a sovereign nation?
June 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM #412739patb
Participantit’s about executive discretion, that the funds once appropriated
are not the subject of litigation.essentially, if the Congress gives Obama 300 million for general white house
operations, it’s not a lawsuit if he decides to hire flower girls to walk in
front of him casting petals.June 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM #412955patb
Participantit’s about executive discretion, that the funds once appropriated
are not the subject of litigation.essentially, if the Congress gives Obama 300 million for general white house
operations, it’s not a lawsuit if he decides to hire flower girls to walk in
front of him casting petals.June 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM #412804patb
Participantit’s about executive discretion, that the funds once appropriated
are not the subject of litigation.essentially, if the Congress gives Obama 300 million for general white house
operations, it’s not a lawsuit if he decides to hire flower girls to walk in
front of him casting petals.June 8, 2009 at 11:13 AM #412491patb
Participantit’s about executive discretion, that the funds once appropriated
are not the subject of litigation.essentially, if the Congress gives Obama 300 million for general white house
operations, it’s not a lawsuit if he decides to hire flower girls to walk in
front of him casting petals. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.