Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES!!!
- This topic has 220 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by mike92104.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 20, 2008 at 9:19 AM #273398September 20, 2008 at 12:34 PM #27314034f3f3fParticipant
Funny. I think of it just the opposite. Don’t do a $1.2 trillion bailout until you are certain of what the consequences will be. They will surely be bad.
Perhaps, except there’s pretty much a consensus amongst “those who know” that to do nothing is the worse of the two options.
Congressional Meddling In The Free Market.
Well then you are agreeing with me aren’t you?
September 20, 2008 at 12:34 PM #27338734f3f3fParticipantFunny. I think of it just the opposite. Don’t do a $1.2 trillion bailout until you are certain of what the consequences will be. They will surely be bad.
Perhaps, except there’s pretty much a consensus amongst “those who know” that to do nothing is the worse of the two options.
Congressional Meddling In The Free Market.
Well then you are agreeing with me aren’t you?
September 20, 2008 at 12:34 PM #27339134f3f3fParticipantFunny. I think of it just the opposite. Don’t do a $1.2 trillion bailout until you are certain of what the consequences will be. They will surely be bad.
Perhaps, except there’s pretty much a consensus amongst “those who know” that to do nothing is the worse of the two options.
Congressional Meddling In The Free Market.
Well then you are agreeing with me aren’t you?
September 20, 2008 at 12:34 PM #27343434f3f3fParticipantFunny. I think of it just the opposite. Don’t do a $1.2 trillion bailout until you are certain of what the consequences will be. They will surely be bad.
Perhaps, except there’s pretty much a consensus amongst “those who know” that to do nothing is the worse of the two options.
Congressional Meddling In The Free Market.
Well then you are agreeing with me aren’t you?
September 20, 2008 at 12:34 PM #27345834f3f3fParticipantFunny. I think of it just the opposite. Don’t do a $1.2 trillion bailout until you are certain of what the consequences will be. They will surely be bad.
Perhaps, except there’s pretty much a consensus amongst “those who know” that to do nothing is the worse of the two options.
Congressional Meddling In The Free Market.
Well then you are agreeing with me aren’t you?
September 20, 2008 at 1:34 PM #273165SD TransplantParticipantI do agree that action must be taken. However, I would like to see the big picture, and there are a couple of immediate options that make sense:
1) Write your congressman/senators/representative
= keep the status quo2) Elections are in just a few months/day – let’s make our voices heard PROPERLY.
= DO NOT VOTE ANY INCUMBANT IN THE OFFICE AGAINI choose # 2 as the only message left to do. This message ought to be unified and strong.
September 20, 2008 at 1:34 PM #273412SD TransplantParticipantI do agree that action must be taken. However, I would like to see the big picture, and there are a couple of immediate options that make sense:
1) Write your congressman/senators/representative
= keep the status quo2) Elections are in just a few months/day – let’s make our voices heard PROPERLY.
= DO NOT VOTE ANY INCUMBANT IN THE OFFICE AGAINI choose # 2 as the only message left to do. This message ought to be unified and strong.
September 20, 2008 at 1:34 PM #273416SD TransplantParticipantI do agree that action must be taken. However, I would like to see the big picture, and there are a couple of immediate options that make sense:
1) Write your congressman/senators/representative
= keep the status quo2) Elections are in just a few months/day – let’s make our voices heard PROPERLY.
= DO NOT VOTE ANY INCUMBANT IN THE OFFICE AGAINI choose # 2 as the only message left to do. This message ought to be unified and strong.
September 20, 2008 at 1:34 PM #273459SD TransplantParticipantI do agree that action must be taken. However, I would like to see the big picture, and there are a couple of immediate options that make sense:
1) Write your congressman/senators/representative
= keep the status quo2) Elections are in just a few months/day – let’s make our voices heard PROPERLY.
= DO NOT VOTE ANY INCUMBANT IN THE OFFICE AGAINI choose # 2 as the only message left to do. This message ought to be unified and strong.
September 20, 2008 at 1:34 PM #273483SD TransplantParticipantI do agree that action must be taken. However, I would like to see the big picture, and there are a couple of immediate options that make sense:
1) Write your congressman/senators/representative
= keep the status quo2) Elections are in just a few months/day – let’s make our voices heard PROPERLY.
= DO NOT VOTE ANY INCUMBANT IN THE OFFICE AGAINI choose # 2 as the only message left to do. This message ought to be unified and strong.
September 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM #273175CA renterParticipantI’m all for the following bailouts:
1. FDIC
2. SIPC (for brokerage accounts)
3. PBGC (guarantee/backstop for retirees and their money)
4. Money-market accounts under the FDIC like they have already done.
5. A fund that will help the insurance companies pay out regular property and casualty claims to citizens.
I think the large financial institutions can be taken over completely, with all existing and future potential profits staying with the govt (wind-down, and do NOT spin-off into the private market when it’s profitable again).
And the most important thing of all is to investigate all the regulators, ratings agencies, and executives/directors of the large financial institutions, politicians and others who enabled and encouraged this to happen in the first place. The Federal Reserve should be at the top of that list. ALL of their assets should be seized (overseas accounts, accounts held in family/friends names, homes, cars, yachts…EVERYTHING) to pay for all the damage they’ve done. This should be done BEFORE a single cent of taxpayers’ money is used.
Why do we hear about all the investigations into short selling when the real criminals are right under their nose (those who pushed the credit market to expand like it did).
September 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM #273422CA renterParticipantI’m all for the following bailouts:
1. FDIC
2. SIPC (for brokerage accounts)
3. PBGC (guarantee/backstop for retirees and their money)
4. Money-market accounts under the FDIC like they have already done.
5. A fund that will help the insurance companies pay out regular property and casualty claims to citizens.
I think the large financial institutions can be taken over completely, with all existing and future potential profits staying with the govt (wind-down, and do NOT spin-off into the private market when it’s profitable again).
And the most important thing of all is to investigate all the regulators, ratings agencies, and executives/directors of the large financial institutions, politicians and others who enabled and encouraged this to happen in the first place. The Federal Reserve should be at the top of that list. ALL of their assets should be seized (overseas accounts, accounts held in family/friends names, homes, cars, yachts…EVERYTHING) to pay for all the damage they’ve done. This should be done BEFORE a single cent of taxpayers’ money is used.
Why do we hear about all the investigations into short selling when the real criminals are right under their nose (those who pushed the credit market to expand like it did).
September 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM #273426CA renterParticipantI’m all for the following bailouts:
1. FDIC
2. SIPC (for brokerage accounts)
3. PBGC (guarantee/backstop for retirees and their money)
4. Money-market accounts under the FDIC like they have already done.
5. A fund that will help the insurance companies pay out regular property and casualty claims to citizens.
I think the large financial institutions can be taken over completely, with all existing and future potential profits staying with the govt (wind-down, and do NOT spin-off into the private market when it’s profitable again).
And the most important thing of all is to investigate all the regulators, ratings agencies, and executives/directors of the large financial institutions, politicians and others who enabled and encouraged this to happen in the first place. The Federal Reserve should be at the top of that list. ALL of their assets should be seized (overseas accounts, accounts held in family/friends names, homes, cars, yachts…EVERYTHING) to pay for all the damage they’ve done. This should be done BEFORE a single cent of taxpayers’ money is used.
Why do we hear about all the investigations into short selling when the real criminals are right under their nose (those who pushed the credit market to expand like it did).
September 20, 2008 at 2:19 PM #273469CA renterParticipantI’m all for the following bailouts:
1. FDIC
2. SIPC (for brokerage accounts)
3. PBGC (guarantee/backstop for retirees and their money)
4. Money-market accounts under the FDIC like they have already done.
5. A fund that will help the insurance companies pay out regular property and casualty claims to citizens.
I think the large financial institutions can be taken over completely, with all existing and future potential profits staying with the govt (wind-down, and do NOT spin-off into the private market when it’s profitable again).
And the most important thing of all is to investigate all the regulators, ratings agencies, and executives/directors of the large financial institutions, politicians and others who enabled and encouraged this to happen in the first place. The Federal Reserve should be at the top of that list. ALL of their assets should be seized (overseas accounts, accounts held in family/friends names, homes, cars, yachts…EVERYTHING) to pay for all the damage they’ve done. This should be done BEFORE a single cent of taxpayers’ money is used.
Why do we hear about all the investigations into short selling when the real criminals are right under their nose (those who pushed the credit market to expand like it did).
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.