- This topic has 195 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 6 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 22, 2009 at 6:40 PM #386526April 22, 2009 at 7:02 PM #385880meadandaleParticipant
[quote=pri_dk]
Got a source for that statistic?Total state budget for 2000/01:
$88 billionTotal for 2007/08:
$102 billionNot exactly “double”.
[/quote]
http://www.dof.ca.gov/budgeting/budget_faqs/information/documents/CHART-B.pdf
1999-2000: $85 billion
2007-2008: $138 billionThat’s an increase of 62%. Not quite double but not nearly as low as your numbers indicate. Over that period, property tax revenue doubled and to hear the counties talk, the state takes the majority of the property tax revenue for themselves.
Did the population of CA increase by 62% in 7 years? 30%?
CA state spending is OUT OF CONTROL.
You want to know where to cut spending? Eliminate the generous pensions and paid healthcare. Do you know anyone in the private sector that gets to retire with a full pension and health benefits after 25 years on the job? Do you know anyone in the private sector that gets GUARANTEED investment returns on their retirement investments?
April 22, 2009 at 7:02 PM #386147meadandaleParticipant[quote=pri_dk]
Got a source for that statistic?Total state budget for 2000/01:
$88 billionTotal for 2007/08:
$102 billionNot exactly “double”.
[/quote]
http://www.dof.ca.gov/budgeting/budget_faqs/information/documents/CHART-B.pdf
1999-2000: $85 billion
2007-2008: $138 billionThat’s an increase of 62%. Not quite double but not nearly as low as your numbers indicate. Over that period, property tax revenue doubled and to hear the counties talk, the state takes the majority of the property tax revenue for themselves.
Did the population of CA increase by 62% in 7 years? 30%?
CA state spending is OUT OF CONTROL.
You want to know where to cut spending? Eliminate the generous pensions and paid healthcare. Do you know anyone in the private sector that gets to retire with a full pension and health benefits after 25 years on the job? Do you know anyone in the private sector that gets GUARANTEED investment returns on their retirement investments?
April 22, 2009 at 7:02 PM #386345meadandaleParticipant[quote=pri_dk]
Got a source for that statistic?Total state budget for 2000/01:
$88 billionTotal for 2007/08:
$102 billionNot exactly “double”.
[/quote]
http://www.dof.ca.gov/budgeting/budget_faqs/information/documents/CHART-B.pdf
1999-2000: $85 billion
2007-2008: $138 billionThat’s an increase of 62%. Not quite double but not nearly as low as your numbers indicate. Over that period, property tax revenue doubled and to hear the counties talk, the state takes the majority of the property tax revenue for themselves.
Did the population of CA increase by 62% in 7 years? 30%?
CA state spending is OUT OF CONTROL.
You want to know where to cut spending? Eliminate the generous pensions and paid healthcare. Do you know anyone in the private sector that gets to retire with a full pension and health benefits after 25 years on the job? Do you know anyone in the private sector that gets GUARANTEED investment returns on their retirement investments?
April 22, 2009 at 7:02 PM #386393meadandaleParticipant[quote=pri_dk]
Got a source for that statistic?Total state budget for 2000/01:
$88 billionTotal for 2007/08:
$102 billionNot exactly “double”.
[/quote]
http://www.dof.ca.gov/budgeting/budget_faqs/information/documents/CHART-B.pdf
1999-2000: $85 billion
2007-2008: $138 billionThat’s an increase of 62%. Not quite double but not nearly as low as your numbers indicate. Over that period, property tax revenue doubled and to hear the counties talk, the state takes the majority of the property tax revenue for themselves.
Did the population of CA increase by 62% in 7 years? 30%?
CA state spending is OUT OF CONTROL.
You want to know where to cut spending? Eliminate the generous pensions and paid healthcare. Do you know anyone in the private sector that gets to retire with a full pension and health benefits after 25 years on the job? Do you know anyone in the private sector that gets GUARANTEED investment returns on their retirement investments?
April 22, 2009 at 7:02 PM #386531meadandaleParticipant[quote=pri_dk]
Got a source for that statistic?Total state budget for 2000/01:
$88 billionTotal for 2007/08:
$102 billionNot exactly “double”.
[/quote]
http://www.dof.ca.gov/budgeting/budget_faqs/information/documents/CHART-B.pdf
1999-2000: $85 billion
2007-2008: $138 billionThat’s an increase of 62%. Not quite double but not nearly as low as your numbers indicate. Over that period, property tax revenue doubled and to hear the counties talk, the state takes the majority of the property tax revenue for themselves.
Did the population of CA increase by 62% in 7 years? 30%?
CA state spending is OUT OF CONTROL.
You want to know where to cut spending? Eliminate the generous pensions and paid healthcare. Do you know anyone in the private sector that gets to retire with a full pension and health benefits after 25 years on the job? Do you know anyone in the private sector that gets GUARANTEED investment returns on their retirement investments?
April 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM #3858854plexownerParticipantunfortunately we have dug ourselves a very deep hole with Keynesian economics and fiat currency
what we have created is an unsustainable system and we may have reached the system’s limits
in the good old days, grandma wasn’t on 6 prescription medications costing several hundred dollars per month – now that we’ve created a system where grandma IS on those meds, what do we do when we can no longer afford them? “Sorry, grandma – you’re toast” doesn’t go over very well in the media
and not only do we have grandma on 6 meds we have created an entitlement society where there is a general expectation that grandma’s meds will be paid for one way or another
and not only do we have an entitlement mentality, our citizens are so economically illiterate that they believe just printing more money will solve every problem
damn this is depressing …
April 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM #3861524plexownerParticipantunfortunately we have dug ourselves a very deep hole with Keynesian economics and fiat currency
what we have created is an unsustainable system and we may have reached the system’s limits
in the good old days, grandma wasn’t on 6 prescription medications costing several hundred dollars per month – now that we’ve created a system where grandma IS on those meds, what do we do when we can no longer afford them? “Sorry, grandma – you’re toast” doesn’t go over very well in the media
and not only do we have grandma on 6 meds we have created an entitlement society where there is a general expectation that grandma’s meds will be paid for one way or another
and not only do we have an entitlement mentality, our citizens are so economically illiterate that they believe just printing more money will solve every problem
damn this is depressing …
April 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM #3863504plexownerParticipantunfortunately we have dug ourselves a very deep hole with Keynesian economics and fiat currency
what we have created is an unsustainable system and we may have reached the system’s limits
in the good old days, grandma wasn’t on 6 prescription medications costing several hundred dollars per month – now that we’ve created a system where grandma IS on those meds, what do we do when we can no longer afford them? “Sorry, grandma – you’re toast” doesn’t go over very well in the media
and not only do we have grandma on 6 meds we have created an entitlement society where there is a general expectation that grandma’s meds will be paid for one way or another
and not only do we have an entitlement mentality, our citizens are so economically illiterate that they believe just printing more money will solve every problem
damn this is depressing …
April 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM #3863984plexownerParticipantunfortunately we have dug ourselves a very deep hole with Keynesian economics and fiat currency
what we have created is an unsustainable system and we may have reached the system’s limits
in the good old days, grandma wasn’t on 6 prescription medications costing several hundred dollars per month – now that we’ve created a system where grandma IS on those meds, what do we do when we can no longer afford them? “Sorry, grandma – you’re toast” doesn’t go over very well in the media
and not only do we have grandma on 6 meds we have created an entitlement society where there is a general expectation that grandma’s meds will be paid for one way or another
and not only do we have an entitlement mentality, our citizens are so economically illiterate that they believe just printing more money will solve every problem
damn this is depressing …
April 22, 2009 at 7:06 PM #3865364plexownerParticipantunfortunately we have dug ourselves a very deep hole with Keynesian economics and fiat currency
what we have created is an unsustainable system and we may have reached the system’s limits
in the good old days, grandma wasn’t on 6 prescription medications costing several hundred dollars per month – now that we’ve created a system where grandma IS on those meds, what do we do when we can no longer afford them? “Sorry, grandma – you’re toast” doesn’t go over very well in the media
and not only do we have grandma on 6 meds we have created an entitlement society where there is a general expectation that grandma’s meds will be paid for one way or another
and not only do we have an entitlement mentality, our citizens are so economically illiterate that they believe just printing more money will solve every problem
damn this is depressing …
April 22, 2009 at 8:39 PM #385900poorgradstudentParticipant[quote=meadandale]
1999-2000: $85 billion
2007-2008: $138 billionThat’s an increase of 62%. Not quite double but not nearly as low as your numbers indicate. Over that period, property tax revenue doubled and to hear the counties talk, the state takes the majority of the property tax revenue for themselves.
Did the population of CA increase by 62% in 7 years? 30%?[/quote]
Based on the CPI, $85b in 2000 dollars is $106b in 2008 dollars.Of course, increases in revenue would also need to be inflation adjusted.
April 22, 2009 at 8:39 PM #386167poorgradstudentParticipant[quote=meadandale]
1999-2000: $85 billion
2007-2008: $138 billionThat’s an increase of 62%. Not quite double but not nearly as low as your numbers indicate. Over that period, property tax revenue doubled and to hear the counties talk, the state takes the majority of the property tax revenue for themselves.
Did the population of CA increase by 62% in 7 years? 30%?[/quote]
Based on the CPI, $85b in 2000 dollars is $106b in 2008 dollars.Of course, increases in revenue would also need to be inflation adjusted.
April 22, 2009 at 8:39 PM #386365poorgradstudentParticipant[quote=meadandale]
1999-2000: $85 billion
2007-2008: $138 billionThat’s an increase of 62%. Not quite double but not nearly as low as your numbers indicate. Over that period, property tax revenue doubled and to hear the counties talk, the state takes the majority of the property tax revenue for themselves.
Did the population of CA increase by 62% in 7 years? 30%?[/quote]
Based on the CPI, $85b in 2000 dollars is $106b in 2008 dollars.Of course, increases in revenue would also need to be inflation adjusted.
April 22, 2009 at 8:39 PM #386413poorgradstudentParticipant[quote=meadandale]
1999-2000: $85 billion
2007-2008: $138 billionThat’s an increase of 62%. Not quite double but not nearly as low as your numbers indicate. Over that period, property tax revenue doubled and to hear the counties talk, the state takes the majority of the property tax revenue for themselves.
Did the population of CA increase by 62% in 7 years? 30%?[/quote]
Based on the CPI, $85b in 2000 dollars is $106b in 2008 dollars.Of course, increases in revenue would also need to be inflation adjusted.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.