- This topic has 105 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
drunkle.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 20, 2007 at 7:54 PM #10962November 20, 2007 at 8:54 PM #102147
JWM in SD
Participant“With this type of cooperation from loan servicers, we can save tens of thousands of people from being added to the foreclosure lists.”
Ah yes, but they should on the foreclosure because they shouldn’t have been given a loan in the first place.
Gee, I wonder how the investors in the MBS’s that were sold by the participating lenders feel about that…they’re getting hosed on this.
November 20, 2007 at 8:54 PM #102226Participant“With this type of cooperation from loan servicers, we can save tens of thousands of people from being added to the foreclosure lists.”
Ah yes, but they should on the foreclosure because they shouldn’t have been given a loan in the first place.
Gee, I wonder how the investors in the MBS’s that were sold by the participating lenders feel about that…they’re getting hosed on this.
November 20, 2007 at 8:54 PM #102235Participant“With this type of cooperation from loan servicers, we can save tens of thousands of people from being added to the foreclosure lists.”
Ah yes, but they should on the foreclosure because they shouldn’t have been given a loan in the first place.
Gee, I wonder how the investors in the MBS’s that were sold by the participating lenders feel about that…they’re getting hosed on this.
November 20, 2007 at 8:54 PM #102259Participant“With this type of cooperation from loan servicers, we can save tens of thousands of people from being added to the foreclosure lists.”
Ah yes, but they should on the foreclosure because they shouldn’t have been given a loan in the first place.
Gee, I wonder how the investors in the MBS’s that were sold by the participating lenders feel about that…they’re getting hosed on this.
November 20, 2007 at 8:54 PM #102287Participant“With this type of cooperation from loan servicers, we can save tens of thousands of people from being added to the foreclosure lists.”
Ah yes, but they should on the foreclosure because they shouldn’t have been given a loan in the first place.
Gee, I wonder how the investors in the MBS’s that were sold by the participating lenders feel about that…they’re getting hosed on this.
November 20, 2007 at 9:42 PM #102168Anonymous
GuestSuspect this will prove to be lip service, for the most part
November 20, 2007 at 9:42 PM #102245GuestSuspect this will prove to be lip service, for the most part
November 20, 2007 at 9:42 PM #102256GuestSuspect this will prove to be lip service, for the most part
November 20, 2007 at 9:42 PM #102279GuestSuspect this will prove to be lip service, for the most part
November 20, 2007 at 9:42 PM #102307GuestSuspect this will prove to be lip service, for the most part
November 20, 2007 at 9:49 PM #102178ParticipantSorry, but this is really pissing me off and I have more to say about it.
Here is what Hank Paulson had to say today as well…”aggressively encouraging” the mortgage-service industry — which collects loan payments from borrowers — to develop criteria that would enable large groups of borrowers who might default on their payments to qualify for loans with better terms.”
Sound familiar? The problem with all of these assinine suggestions is that the problem is not with the terms. It’s the PRINCIPAL!!!!! Prices paid were beyond the ability of the borrowers to service the debt they incurred. Any workout of the debt structure in a loan that actually amortizes the principal cannot be afforded by the borrower in question in many cases. Ah yes, amortization schedules, anyone remember those? Hell, I used to build those for fun back in the day. Try asking for one now and watch the look on the brokers face.
November 20, 2007 at 9:49 PM #102255ParticipantSorry, but this is really pissing me off and I have more to say about it.
Here is what Hank Paulson had to say today as well…”aggressively encouraging” the mortgage-service industry — which collects loan payments from borrowers — to develop criteria that would enable large groups of borrowers who might default on their payments to qualify for loans with better terms.”
Sound familiar? The problem with all of these assinine suggestions is that the problem is not with the terms. It’s the PRINCIPAL!!!!! Prices paid were beyond the ability of the borrowers to service the debt they incurred. Any workout of the debt structure in a loan that actually amortizes the principal cannot be afforded by the borrower in question in many cases. Ah yes, amortization schedules, anyone remember those? Hell, I used to build those for fun back in the day. Try asking for one now and watch the look on the brokers face.
November 20, 2007 at 9:49 PM #102266ParticipantSorry, but this is really pissing me off and I have more to say about it.
Here is what Hank Paulson had to say today as well…”aggressively encouraging” the mortgage-service industry — which collects loan payments from borrowers — to develop criteria that would enable large groups of borrowers who might default on their payments to qualify for loans with better terms.”
Sound familiar? The problem with all of these assinine suggestions is that the problem is not with the terms. It’s the PRINCIPAL!!!!! Prices paid were beyond the ability of the borrowers to service the debt they incurred. Any workout of the debt structure in a loan that actually amortizes the principal cannot be afforded by the borrower in question in many cases. Ah yes, amortization schedules, anyone remember those? Hell, I used to build those for fun back in the day. Try asking for one now and watch the look on the brokers face.
November 20, 2007 at 9:49 PM #102289ParticipantSorry, but this is really pissing me off and I have more to say about it.
Here is what Hank Paulson had to say today as well…”aggressively encouraging” the mortgage-service industry — which collects loan payments from borrowers — to develop criteria that would enable large groups of borrowers who might default on their payments to qualify for loans with better terms.”
Sound familiar? The problem with all of these assinine suggestions is that the problem is not with the terms. It’s the PRINCIPAL!!!!! Prices paid were beyond the ability of the borrowers to service the debt they incurred. Any workout of the debt structure in a loan that actually amortizes the principal cannot be afforded by the borrower in question in many cases. Ah yes, amortization schedules, anyone remember those? Hell, I used to build those for fun back in the day. Try asking for one now and watch the look on the brokers face.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.