CA State Budget Passed – State’s demise imminent

[kewp]

[quote=Djshakes]This is the condition that California and other states with powerful public-sector unions find themselves in. California has ~2.3 million unionized government workers and ~18.6 million civilians. With so many people organized with a laser-like focus on increasing taxes and spending, the private working citizens of California find it nearly impossible to prevent government workers from voting their own paychecks.
[/quote]

Then the civilians are doing something wrong, as they have a clear majority.

[an]

[quote=kewp]
Then the civilians are doing something wrong, as they have a clear majority.
[/quote]
They failed by not forming their own union. I guess we all should create/join an anti-union union :-D.

[an]

[quote=kewp]
Then the civilians are doing something wrong, as they have a clear majority.
[/quote]
They failed by not forming their own union. I guess we all should create/join an anti-union union :-D.

[an]

[quote=kewp]
Then the civilians are doing something wrong, as they have a clear majority.
[/quote]
They failed by not forming their own union. I guess we all should create/join an anti-union union :-D.

[an]

[quote=kewp]
Then the civilians are doing something wrong, as they have a clear majority.
[/quote]
They failed by not forming their own union. I guess we all should create/join an anti-union union :-D.

[an]

[quote=kewp]
Then the civilians are doing something wrong, as they have a clear majority.
[/quote]
They failed by not forming their own union. I guess we all should create/join an anti-union union :-D.

[TemekuT]

Are Retired Annuitants part of the budgetary problem?:

http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/ohr/pom/Retired%20Annuitants%20Revise.pdf

What a great system. Just retire, collect your pension and healthcare benefits, and then get rehired for as much as 6 months annually at the daily equivalent of your prior salary plus benefits.

You’d be surprised how many annuitants exist on the State’s payroll. It’s funny how much post-retirement “special expertise” is required at the higher levels of state agencies.

[TemekuT]

Are Retired Annuitants part of the budgetary problem?:

http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/ohr/pom/Retired%20Annuitants%20Revise.pdf

What a great system. Just retire, collect your pension and healthcare benefits, and then get rehired for as much as 6 months annually at the daily equivalent of your prior salary plus benefits.

You’d be surprised how many annuitants exist on the State’s payroll. It’s funny how much post-retirement “special expertise” is required at the higher levels of state agencies.

[TemekuT]

Are Retired Annuitants part of the budgetary problem?:

http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/ohr/pom/Retired%20Annuitants%20Revise.pdf

What a great system. Just retire, collect your pension and healthcare benefits, and then get rehired for as much as 6 months annually at the daily equivalent of your prior salary plus benefits.

You’d be surprised how many annuitants exist on the State’s payroll. It’s funny how much post-retirement “special expertise” is required at the higher levels of state agencies.

[TemekuT]

Are Retired Annuitants part of the budgetary problem?:

http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/ohr/pom/Retired%20Annuitants%20Revise.pdf

What a great system. Just retire, collect your pension and healthcare benefits, and then get rehired for as much as 6 months annually at the daily equivalent of your prior salary plus benefits.

You’d be surprised how many annuitants exist on the State’s payroll. It’s funny how much post-retirement “special expertise” is required at the higher levels of state agencies.

[TemekuT]

Are Retired Annuitants part of the budgetary problem?:

http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/ohr/pom/Retired%20Annuitants%20Revise.pdf

What a great system. Just retire, collect your pension and healthcare benefits, and then get rehired for as much as 6 months annually at the daily equivalent of your prior salary plus benefits.

You’d be surprised how many annuitants exist on the State’s payroll. It’s funny how much post-retirement “special expertise” is required at the higher levels of state agencies.

[kewp]

[quote=TemekuT]
You’d be surprised how many annuitants exist on the State’s payroll. It’s funny how much post-retirement “special expertise” is required at the higher levels of state agencies.[/quote]

You would be surprised how hard it is to attract competent people with government salaries.

Anyway, if the public sector is so great, why not work there? I’ll suggest joining the Army, they are always looking for fresh meat, I mean new blood!

[kewp]

[quote=TemekuT]
You’d be surprised how many annuitants exist on the State’s payroll. It’s funny how much post-retirement “special expertise” is required at the higher levels of state agencies.[/quote]

You would be surprised how hard it is to attract competent people with government salaries.

Anyway, if the public sector is so great, why not work there? I’ll suggest joining the Army, they are always looking for fresh meat, I mean new blood!

[kewp]

[quote=TemekuT]
You’d be surprised how many annuitants exist on the State’s payroll. It’s funny how much post-retirement “special expertise” is required at the higher levels of state agencies.[/quote]

You would be surprised how hard it is to attract competent people with government salaries.

Anyway, if the public sector is so great, why not work there? I’ll suggest joining the Army, they are always looking for fresh meat, I mean new blood!

[kewp]

[quote=TemekuT]
You’d be surprised how many annuitants exist on the State’s payroll. It’s funny how much post-retirement “special expertise” is required at the higher levels of state agencies.[/quote]

You would be surprised how hard it is to attract competent people with government salaries.

Anyway, if the public sector is so great, why not work there? I’ll suggest joining the Army, they are always looking for fresh meat, I mean new blood!

[Author]

Posts