Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Buying an condo conversaion as an investment property
- This topic has 65 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 8 months ago by CDMA ENG.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 6, 2009 at 11:15 AM #324876January 6, 2009 at 11:19 AM #324881jpinpbParticipant
If you are buying a condo, please, even for investment, read the threads on here about HOAs and the threads on SDLookup.
As a quick recent example. My girlfriend and her husband bought a condo in a complex. They were told the balcony is their responsibility. Last year their neighbor redid their balcony.
Many balconys in this older complex are seeing wear and tear. The condo board decided to change the rules. Now it is part of the complex. They are contemplating assessing 10k to each owner to redo the balconies throughout the entire complex. (insanely, even the neighbor who redid theirs)
My friend pretty much told the HOA to file a lien. They don’t have 10k for a balcony.
The most disturbing part is originally the balcony was the owner’s premises. They change the rules along the way.
Paying the monthly HOAs are bad enough, but you can almost justify it if you are not the type of person that, for example, likes to do yard work, or if you enjoy a pool, etc.
But the CC&RS are the deal breaker for me. It is like living in a Nazi regime. They make up rules as they go along. I mentioned once about a lawsuit regarding a palm tree that was planted that did not conform w/the other palm trees in a community. Or the lawsuit over the color of a window trim.
If there are foreclosures in the complex, expect HOAs to be underfunded, hence special assessments.
If there are any lawsuits, expect special assessments. See Villa Vicenza, as an example. I could go on and on. Needless to say, do your homework.
I know some of the condos in UTC are seeing some major declines and it is tempting b/c they are easy rentals especially w/the proximity to UCSD.
January 6, 2009 at 11:19 AM #325219jpinpbParticipantIf you are buying a condo, please, even for investment, read the threads on here about HOAs and the threads on SDLookup.
As a quick recent example. My girlfriend and her husband bought a condo in a complex. They were told the balcony is their responsibility. Last year their neighbor redid their balcony.
Many balconys in this older complex are seeing wear and tear. The condo board decided to change the rules. Now it is part of the complex. They are contemplating assessing 10k to each owner to redo the balconies throughout the entire complex. (insanely, even the neighbor who redid theirs)
My friend pretty much told the HOA to file a lien. They don’t have 10k for a balcony.
The most disturbing part is originally the balcony was the owner’s premises. They change the rules along the way.
Paying the monthly HOAs are bad enough, but you can almost justify it if you are not the type of person that, for example, likes to do yard work, or if you enjoy a pool, etc.
But the CC&RS are the deal breaker for me. It is like living in a Nazi regime. They make up rules as they go along. I mentioned once about a lawsuit regarding a palm tree that was planted that did not conform w/the other palm trees in a community. Or the lawsuit over the color of a window trim.
If there are foreclosures in the complex, expect HOAs to be underfunded, hence special assessments.
If there are any lawsuits, expect special assessments. See Villa Vicenza, as an example. I could go on and on. Needless to say, do your homework.
I know some of the condos in UTC are seeing some major declines and it is tempting b/c they are easy rentals especially w/the proximity to UCSD.
January 6, 2009 at 11:19 AM #325287jpinpbParticipantIf you are buying a condo, please, even for investment, read the threads on here about HOAs and the threads on SDLookup.
As a quick recent example. My girlfriend and her husband bought a condo in a complex. They were told the balcony is their responsibility. Last year their neighbor redid their balcony.
Many balconys in this older complex are seeing wear and tear. The condo board decided to change the rules. Now it is part of the complex. They are contemplating assessing 10k to each owner to redo the balconies throughout the entire complex. (insanely, even the neighbor who redid theirs)
My friend pretty much told the HOA to file a lien. They don’t have 10k for a balcony.
The most disturbing part is originally the balcony was the owner’s premises. They change the rules along the way.
Paying the monthly HOAs are bad enough, but you can almost justify it if you are not the type of person that, for example, likes to do yard work, or if you enjoy a pool, etc.
But the CC&RS are the deal breaker for me. It is like living in a Nazi regime. They make up rules as they go along. I mentioned once about a lawsuit regarding a palm tree that was planted that did not conform w/the other palm trees in a community. Or the lawsuit over the color of a window trim.
If there are foreclosures in the complex, expect HOAs to be underfunded, hence special assessments.
If there are any lawsuits, expect special assessments. See Villa Vicenza, as an example. I could go on and on. Needless to say, do your homework.
I know some of the condos in UTC are seeing some major declines and it is tempting b/c they are easy rentals especially w/the proximity to UCSD.
January 6, 2009 at 11:19 AM #325303jpinpbParticipantIf you are buying a condo, please, even for investment, read the threads on here about HOAs and the threads on SDLookup.
As a quick recent example. My girlfriend and her husband bought a condo in a complex. They were told the balcony is their responsibility. Last year their neighbor redid their balcony.
Many balconys in this older complex are seeing wear and tear. The condo board decided to change the rules. Now it is part of the complex. They are contemplating assessing 10k to each owner to redo the balconies throughout the entire complex. (insanely, even the neighbor who redid theirs)
My friend pretty much told the HOA to file a lien. They don’t have 10k for a balcony.
The most disturbing part is originally the balcony was the owner’s premises. They change the rules along the way.
Paying the monthly HOAs are bad enough, but you can almost justify it if you are not the type of person that, for example, likes to do yard work, or if you enjoy a pool, etc.
But the CC&RS are the deal breaker for me. It is like living in a Nazi regime. They make up rules as they go along. I mentioned once about a lawsuit regarding a palm tree that was planted that did not conform w/the other palm trees in a community. Or the lawsuit over the color of a window trim.
If there are foreclosures in the complex, expect HOAs to be underfunded, hence special assessments.
If there are any lawsuits, expect special assessments. See Villa Vicenza, as an example. I could go on and on. Needless to say, do your homework.
I know some of the condos in UTC are seeing some major declines and it is tempting b/c they are easy rentals especially w/the proximity to UCSD.
January 6, 2009 at 11:19 AM #325385jpinpbParticipantIf you are buying a condo, please, even for investment, read the threads on here about HOAs and the threads on SDLookup.
As a quick recent example. My girlfriend and her husband bought a condo in a complex. They were told the balcony is their responsibility. Last year their neighbor redid their balcony.
Many balconys in this older complex are seeing wear and tear. The condo board decided to change the rules. Now it is part of the complex. They are contemplating assessing 10k to each owner to redo the balconies throughout the entire complex. (insanely, even the neighbor who redid theirs)
My friend pretty much told the HOA to file a lien. They don’t have 10k for a balcony.
The most disturbing part is originally the balcony was the owner’s premises. They change the rules along the way.
Paying the monthly HOAs are bad enough, but you can almost justify it if you are not the type of person that, for example, likes to do yard work, or if you enjoy a pool, etc.
But the CC&RS are the deal breaker for me. It is like living in a Nazi regime. They make up rules as they go along. I mentioned once about a lawsuit regarding a palm tree that was planted that did not conform w/the other palm trees in a community. Or the lawsuit over the color of a window trim.
If there are foreclosures in the complex, expect HOAs to be underfunded, hence special assessments.
If there are any lawsuits, expect special assessments. See Villa Vicenza, as an example. I could go on and on. Needless to say, do your homework.
I know some of the condos in UTC are seeing some major declines and it is tempting b/c they are easy rentals especially w/the proximity to UCSD.
January 6, 2009 at 11:23 AM #3248864plexownerParticipant“you may want to consider out of state”
to each their own – surveyor (haven’t heard from him lately) owns multiple properties out of the state
I would never own rental property out of the state – too easy to be screwed by tenants or local management that knows you aren’t around
I managed my properties myself and found that 45 minutes away was too far to own a property if you are also working full time (one of my beach properties was 45 minutes away with no traffic and as much as 1 1/2 hours in work or weekend traffic – not much fun dealing with tenants or doing turnovers / showings when a visit to the property meant 1 1/2 to 3 hours of driving)
January 6, 2009 at 11:23 AM #3252224plexownerParticipant“you may want to consider out of state”
to each their own – surveyor (haven’t heard from him lately) owns multiple properties out of the state
I would never own rental property out of the state – too easy to be screwed by tenants or local management that knows you aren’t around
I managed my properties myself and found that 45 minutes away was too far to own a property if you are also working full time (one of my beach properties was 45 minutes away with no traffic and as much as 1 1/2 hours in work or weekend traffic – not much fun dealing with tenants or doing turnovers / showings when a visit to the property meant 1 1/2 to 3 hours of driving)
January 6, 2009 at 11:23 AM #3252924plexownerParticipant“you may want to consider out of state”
to each their own – surveyor (haven’t heard from him lately) owns multiple properties out of the state
I would never own rental property out of the state – too easy to be screwed by tenants or local management that knows you aren’t around
I managed my properties myself and found that 45 minutes away was too far to own a property if you are also working full time (one of my beach properties was 45 minutes away with no traffic and as much as 1 1/2 hours in work or weekend traffic – not much fun dealing with tenants or doing turnovers / showings when a visit to the property meant 1 1/2 to 3 hours of driving)
January 6, 2009 at 11:23 AM #3253084plexownerParticipant“you may want to consider out of state”
to each their own – surveyor (haven’t heard from him lately) owns multiple properties out of the state
I would never own rental property out of the state – too easy to be screwed by tenants or local management that knows you aren’t around
I managed my properties myself and found that 45 minutes away was too far to own a property if you are also working full time (one of my beach properties was 45 minutes away with no traffic and as much as 1 1/2 hours in work or weekend traffic – not much fun dealing with tenants or doing turnovers / showings when a visit to the property meant 1 1/2 to 3 hours of driving)
January 6, 2009 at 11:23 AM #3253904plexownerParticipant“you may want to consider out of state”
to each their own – surveyor (haven’t heard from him lately) owns multiple properties out of the state
I would never own rental property out of the state – too easy to be screwed by tenants or local management that knows you aren’t around
I managed my properties myself and found that 45 minutes away was too far to own a property if you are also working full time (one of my beach properties was 45 minutes away with no traffic and as much as 1 1/2 hours in work or weekend traffic – not much fun dealing with tenants or doing turnovers / showings when a visit to the property meant 1 1/2 to 3 hours of driving)
January 6, 2009 at 11:29 AM #324901jpinpbParticipantI add I also agree. Don’t put all your money down. You don’t know what the future holds. May be hard to get the money out of it if/when you need it. As long as the rent covers the mortgage and a little extra just in case, that’s probably safer. JMO.
January 6, 2009 at 11:29 AM #325322jpinpbParticipantI add I also agree. Don’t put all your money down. You don’t know what the future holds. May be hard to get the money out of it if/when you need it. As long as the rent covers the mortgage and a little extra just in case, that’s probably safer. JMO.
January 6, 2009 at 11:29 AM #325307jpinpbParticipantI add I also agree. Don’t put all your money down. You don’t know what the future holds. May be hard to get the money out of it if/when you need it. As long as the rent covers the mortgage and a little extra just in case, that’s probably safer. JMO.
January 6, 2009 at 11:29 AM #325405jpinpbParticipantI add I also agree. Don’t put all your money down. You don’t know what the future holds. May be hard to get the money out of it if/when you need it. As long as the rent covers the mortgage and a little extra just in case, that’s probably safer. JMO.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.