- This topic has 180 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by robson.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM #148742February 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM #148399patientlywaitingParticipant
If the property market does not begin to appreciate by 2010, then my bet is that it’ll stagnate for 25 years.
The reason is that today’s job market require that people move frequently. Fewer new families can stay put more than 5 years. The ones that can already own homes. Remember, the rate of homeownership is fairly high already.
There will be fewer and fewer new buyers if they think that they need a minimum of 5 years to break even after closing costs.
February 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM #148651patientlywaitingParticipantIf the property market does not begin to appreciate by 2010, then my bet is that it’ll stagnate for 25 years.
The reason is that today’s job market require that people move frequently. Fewer new families can stay put more than 5 years. The ones that can already own homes. Remember, the rate of homeownership is fairly high already.
There will be fewer and fewer new buyers if they think that they need a minimum of 5 years to break even after closing costs.
February 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM #148669patientlywaitingParticipantIf the property market does not begin to appreciate by 2010, then my bet is that it’ll stagnate for 25 years.
The reason is that today’s job market require that people move frequently. Fewer new families can stay put more than 5 years. The ones that can already own homes. Remember, the rate of homeownership is fairly high already.
There will be fewer and fewer new buyers if they think that they need a minimum of 5 years to break even after closing costs.
February 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM #148680patientlywaitingParticipantIf the property market does not begin to appreciate by 2010, then my bet is that it’ll stagnate for 25 years.
The reason is that today’s job market require that people move frequently. Fewer new families can stay put more than 5 years. The ones that can already own homes. Remember, the rate of homeownership is fairly high already.
There will be fewer and fewer new buyers if they think that they need a minimum of 5 years to break even after closing costs.
February 5, 2008 at 12:48 PM #148751patientlywaitingParticipantIf the property market does not begin to appreciate by 2010, then my bet is that it’ll stagnate for 25 years.
The reason is that today’s job market require that people move frequently. Fewer new families can stay put more than 5 years. The ones that can already own homes. Remember, the rate of homeownership is fairly high already.
There will be fewer and fewer new buyers if they think that they need a minimum of 5 years to break even after closing costs.
February 5, 2008 at 1:25 PM #148419gold_dredger_phdParticipantOne reason that the public is confused is because if a lie is repeated over and over again, like in the liberal, anti-capitalist media, then it gets taken as gospel. Goebbels was right, if you repeat a lie, often enough, loud enough, then people will believe you.
I was shocked by this 10 years ago when a friend of mine, at that time, was expressing his viewpoint that the reason there was no peace in the Middle East was because of Israel. That’s the way it plays in Europe because of their media and it is shocking.February 5, 2008 at 1:25 PM #148672gold_dredger_phdParticipantOne reason that the public is confused is because if a lie is repeated over and over again, like in the liberal, anti-capitalist media, then it gets taken as gospel. Goebbels was right, if you repeat a lie, often enough, loud enough, then people will believe you.
I was shocked by this 10 years ago when a friend of mine, at that time, was expressing his viewpoint that the reason there was no peace in the Middle East was because of Israel. That’s the way it plays in Europe because of their media and it is shocking.February 5, 2008 at 1:25 PM #148689gold_dredger_phdParticipantOne reason that the public is confused is because if a lie is repeated over and over again, like in the liberal, anti-capitalist media, then it gets taken as gospel. Goebbels was right, if you repeat a lie, often enough, loud enough, then people will believe you.
I was shocked by this 10 years ago when a friend of mine, at that time, was expressing his viewpoint that the reason there was no peace in the Middle East was because of Israel. That’s the way it plays in Europe because of their media and it is shocking.February 5, 2008 at 1:25 PM #148701gold_dredger_phdParticipantOne reason that the public is confused is because if a lie is repeated over and over again, like in the liberal, anti-capitalist media, then it gets taken as gospel. Goebbels was right, if you repeat a lie, often enough, loud enough, then people will believe you.
I was shocked by this 10 years ago when a friend of mine, at that time, was expressing his viewpoint that the reason there was no peace in the Middle East was because of Israel. That’s the way it plays in Europe because of their media and it is shocking.February 5, 2008 at 1:25 PM #148771gold_dredger_phdParticipantOne reason that the public is confused is because if a lie is repeated over and over again, like in the liberal, anti-capitalist media, then it gets taken as gospel. Goebbels was right, if you repeat a lie, often enough, loud enough, then people will believe you.
I was shocked by this 10 years ago when a friend of mine, at that time, was expressing his viewpoint that the reason there was no peace in the Middle East was because of Israel. That’s the way it plays in Europe because of their media and it is shocking.February 5, 2008 at 3:05 PM #148488robsonParticipantThere are WMDs in IRAQ! Sorry, i had to. I used to find it funny, but it has become increasingly sad that the most bipartisan issue in America today is hatred of the media. Every liberal considers it too conservative and vice versa. To me, that means it’s pretty well represented with subjective opinions all around.
Anyway, I’m curious whether you consider the lie to be that prices always rise, or that we are headed for a recession. Either way, I would attribute the proliferation of those stories to the fact that airing those topics gains the most viewers and thus, the most $. Kind of ironic that capitalism drives the media to air anti-capitalist sentiment.February 5, 2008 at 3:05 PM #148740robsonParticipantThere are WMDs in IRAQ! Sorry, i had to. I used to find it funny, but it has become increasingly sad that the most bipartisan issue in America today is hatred of the media. Every liberal considers it too conservative and vice versa. To me, that means it’s pretty well represented with subjective opinions all around.
Anyway, I’m curious whether you consider the lie to be that prices always rise, or that we are headed for a recession. Either way, I would attribute the proliferation of those stories to the fact that airing those topics gains the most viewers and thus, the most $. Kind of ironic that capitalism drives the media to air anti-capitalist sentiment.February 5, 2008 at 3:05 PM #148758robsonParticipantThere are WMDs in IRAQ! Sorry, i had to. I used to find it funny, but it has become increasingly sad that the most bipartisan issue in America today is hatred of the media. Every liberal considers it too conservative and vice versa. To me, that means it’s pretty well represented with subjective opinions all around.
Anyway, I’m curious whether you consider the lie to be that prices always rise, or that we are headed for a recession. Either way, I would attribute the proliferation of those stories to the fact that airing those topics gains the most viewers and thus, the most $. Kind of ironic that capitalism drives the media to air anti-capitalist sentiment.February 5, 2008 at 3:05 PM #148770robsonParticipantThere are WMDs in IRAQ! Sorry, i had to. I used to find it funny, but it has become increasingly sad that the most bipartisan issue in America today is hatred of the media. Every liberal considers it too conservative and vice versa. To me, that means it’s pretty well represented with subjective opinions all around.
Anyway, I’m curious whether you consider the lie to be that prices always rise, or that we are headed for a recession. Either way, I would attribute the proliferation of those stories to the fact that airing those topics gains the most viewers and thus, the most $. Kind of ironic that capitalism drives the media to air anti-capitalist sentiment. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.