- This topic has 530 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 7 months ago by carlsbadworker.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 28, 2009 at 9:41 AM #389388April 28, 2009 at 9:43 AM #388736sdrealtorParticipant
Perhaps because strapping that anchor provides you a stable placeto live at a predictable price not affected by slumlords indeifference or inflations impact on your monthly rent over the next 10 years?
April 28, 2009 at 9:43 AM #389000sdrealtorParticipantPerhaps because strapping that anchor provides you a stable placeto live at a predictable price not affected by slumlords indeifference or inflations impact on your monthly rent over the next 10 years?
April 28, 2009 at 9:43 AM #389201sdrealtorParticipantPerhaps because strapping that anchor provides you a stable placeto live at a predictable price not affected by slumlords indeifference or inflations impact on your monthly rent over the next 10 years?
April 28, 2009 at 9:43 AM #389254sdrealtorParticipantPerhaps because strapping that anchor provides you a stable placeto live at a predictable price not affected by slumlords indeifference or inflations impact on your monthly rent over the next 10 years?
April 28, 2009 at 9:43 AM #389393sdrealtorParticipantPerhaps because strapping that anchor provides you a stable placeto live at a predictable price not affected by slumlords indeifference or inflations impact on your monthly rent over the next 10 years?
April 28, 2009 at 11:13 AM #388775Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]At current RC pricing early baby boomers can afford to buy homes witht heir social security checks. Whaddaya say Billy Bob? Where would you rather spend the rest of your retirement Claude, Texas and all the wonderful amenities it has to offer or sipping TV wines while TG oggles your daughter in the tasting rooms?[/quote]
Ha!!
All that an still only 35-50 minutes from the best beaches in Socal depending on if you decide to go to OC or SD beaches (OK maybe an hour and 15 minutes to some beaches).
Yes but Claude TX is sooo nice…
Yes but there sooo much supply… etc… etc…
Guy’s there’s is a reason why Murrieta was number one in home resale last year and Temecula was number three.
IT’S RIDICULOUSLY CHEAP FOR WHAT YOU GET !!!!
All in my opinion of course.
OK enough said.April 28, 2009 at 11:13 AM #389040Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]At current RC pricing early baby boomers can afford to buy homes witht heir social security checks. Whaddaya say Billy Bob? Where would you rather spend the rest of your retirement Claude, Texas and all the wonderful amenities it has to offer or sipping TV wines while TG oggles your daughter in the tasting rooms?[/quote]
Ha!!
All that an still only 35-50 minutes from the best beaches in Socal depending on if you decide to go to OC or SD beaches (OK maybe an hour and 15 minutes to some beaches).
Yes but Claude TX is sooo nice…
Yes but there sooo much supply… etc… etc…
Guy’s there’s is a reason why Murrieta was number one in home resale last year and Temecula was number three.
IT’S RIDICULOUSLY CHEAP FOR WHAT YOU GET !!!!
All in my opinion of course.
OK enough said.April 28, 2009 at 11:13 AM #389241Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]At current RC pricing early baby boomers can afford to buy homes witht heir social security checks. Whaddaya say Billy Bob? Where would you rather spend the rest of your retirement Claude, Texas and all the wonderful amenities it has to offer or sipping TV wines while TG oggles your daughter in the tasting rooms?[/quote]
Ha!!
All that an still only 35-50 minutes from the best beaches in Socal depending on if you decide to go to OC or SD beaches (OK maybe an hour and 15 minutes to some beaches).
Yes but Claude TX is sooo nice…
Yes but there sooo much supply… etc… etc…
Guy’s there’s is a reason why Murrieta was number one in home resale last year and Temecula was number three.
IT’S RIDICULOUSLY CHEAP FOR WHAT YOU GET !!!!
All in my opinion of course.
OK enough said.April 28, 2009 at 11:13 AM #389294Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]At current RC pricing early baby boomers can afford to buy homes witht heir social security checks. Whaddaya say Billy Bob? Where would you rather spend the rest of your retirement Claude, Texas and all the wonderful amenities it has to offer or sipping TV wines while TG oggles your daughter in the tasting rooms?[/quote]
Ha!!
All that an still only 35-50 minutes from the best beaches in Socal depending on if you decide to go to OC or SD beaches (OK maybe an hour and 15 minutes to some beaches).
Yes but Claude TX is sooo nice…
Yes but there sooo much supply… etc… etc…
Guy’s there’s is a reason why Murrieta was number one in home resale last year and Temecula was number three.
IT’S RIDICULOUSLY CHEAP FOR WHAT YOU GET !!!!
All in my opinion of course.
OK enough said.April 28, 2009 at 11:13 AM #389433Nor-LA-SD-guyParticipant[quote=sdrealtor]At current RC pricing early baby boomers can afford to buy homes witht heir social security checks. Whaddaya say Billy Bob? Where would you rather spend the rest of your retirement Claude, Texas and all the wonderful amenities it has to offer or sipping TV wines while TG oggles your daughter in the tasting rooms?[/quote]
Ha!!
All that an still only 35-50 minutes from the best beaches in Socal depending on if you decide to go to OC or SD beaches (OK maybe an hour and 15 minutes to some beaches).
Yes but Claude TX is sooo nice…
Yes but there sooo much supply… etc… etc…
Guy’s there’s is a reason why Murrieta was number one in home resale last year and Temecula was number three.
IT’S RIDICULOUSLY CHEAP FOR WHAT YOU GET !!!!
All in my opinion of course.
OK enough said.April 28, 2009 at 1:02 PM #388859Rt.66ParticipantYou only think its rediculously cheap because you’ve been conditioned to fork over way too much of your paycheck to bankers. Maybe something good can come out of this depression, maybe this is our chance to break that cycle of servitude and usury. Banks like you to think you are buying a house for $200k while you are really agreeing to pay them $500k over 30 years. We should try and make things better for us and not bankers.
Good reading some of these posts, this thread is getting fun.
Bob needs to run for office, he gets it.
How about an expert oppinion? Bruce Norris is about as expert as So Cal can offer:
http://www.dailybulletin.com/ci_12228714
Bruce is calling for an additioanl 20% drop in Riverside Co.
I think Temecula is the San Diego of Riverside. Meaning Temecula is the last hold out for stubborn high prices and has farther to fall than 20%.
This is not going to help either:
“Norris has already seen values stated on local home appraisals drop 20 percent in the past 3 1/2 weeks.”
Ouch!!
Now I know someone is going to come out and claim to have a better source than Norris or a realtor who knows better.
I know 2500 sq’ houses eventually will be $150k in TV all day long. Those looking for bargains will look for prices under that. When? If they let the REOs out then….tommorow. That probably won’t happen tommorow, so we’ll have to wait until the market is no longer grossly manipulated.
As for RealtyTrac. Yes you are correct it is inaccurate. It often shows “sold” for a house when it merely sold back to the bank at the courthouse. Tons and tons of REOs are not listed on RT. RT readily admits that there are 80k REOs hidden from veiw in CA. When an REO goes to retail auction it drops off RT after the auction date whether it sells or not.
I attended a Williams and Williams auction on a 3500 sq’ house on 5 acres in the wine area. It sold to an on-line bidder (probably fake) for something like $250k. Of course the bank refused to take it, but now it just sits as part of the shadow inv. So I think you are correct in critisizing RT but for the wrong reasons, they actually under-report.
If I had a link to Jesus Christ’s own REO figures you cheerleaders would say my souces are unreliable. The one thing you can’t escape is that ALL sources show an ugly, ugly picture THAT IS QUICKLY GETTING UGLIER and one thing you can’t provide is an alternative report that shows anything but lots more pain to come.
April 28, 2009 at 1:02 PM #389124Rt.66ParticipantYou only think its rediculously cheap because you’ve been conditioned to fork over way too much of your paycheck to bankers. Maybe something good can come out of this depression, maybe this is our chance to break that cycle of servitude and usury. Banks like you to think you are buying a house for $200k while you are really agreeing to pay them $500k over 30 years. We should try and make things better for us and not bankers.
Good reading some of these posts, this thread is getting fun.
Bob needs to run for office, he gets it.
How about an expert oppinion? Bruce Norris is about as expert as So Cal can offer:
http://www.dailybulletin.com/ci_12228714
Bruce is calling for an additioanl 20% drop in Riverside Co.
I think Temecula is the San Diego of Riverside. Meaning Temecula is the last hold out for stubborn high prices and has farther to fall than 20%.
This is not going to help either:
“Norris has already seen values stated on local home appraisals drop 20 percent in the past 3 1/2 weeks.”
Ouch!!
Now I know someone is going to come out and claim to have a better source than Norris or a realtor who knows better.
I know 2500 sq’ houses eventually will be $150k in TV all day long. Those looking for bargains will look for prices under that. When? If they let the REOs out then….tommorow. That probably won’t happen tommorow, so we’ll have to wait until the market is no longer grossly manipulated.
As for RealtyTrac. Yes you are correct it is inaccurate. It often shows “sold” for a house when it merely sold back to the bank at the courthouse. Tons and tons of REOs are not listed on RT. RT readily admits that there are 80k REOs hidden from veiw in CA. When an REO goes to retail auction it drops off RT after the auction date whether it sells or not.
I attended a Williams and Williams auction on a 3500 sq’ house on 5 acres in the wine area. It sold to an on-line bidder (probably fake) for something like $250k. Of course the bank refused to take it, but now it just sits as part of the shadow inv. So I think you are correct in critisizing RT but for the wrong reasons, they actually under-report.
If I had a link to Jesus Christ’s own REO figures you cheerleaders would say my souces are unreliable. The one thing you can’t escape is that ALL sources show an ugly, ugly picture THAT IS QUICKLY GETTING UGLIER and one thing you can’t provide is an alternative report that shows anything but lots more pain to come.
April 28, 2009 at 1:02 PM #389326Rt.66ParticipantYou only think its rediculously cheap because you’ve been conditioned to fork over way too much of your paycheck to bankers. Maybe something good can come out of this depression, maybe this is our chance to break that cycle of servitude and usury. Banks like you to think you are buying a house for $200k while you are really agreeing to pay them $500k over 30 years. We should try and make things better for us and not bankers.
Good reading some of these posts, this thread is getting fun.
Bob needs to run for office, he gets it.
How about an expert oppinion? Bruce Norris is about as expert as So Cal can offer:
http://www.dailybulletin.com/ci_12228714
Bruce is calling for an additioanl 20% drop in Riverside Co.
I think Temecula is the San Diego of Riverside. Meaning Temecula is the last hold out for stubborn high prices and has farther to fall than 20%.
This is not going to help either:
“Norris has already seen values stated on local home appraisals drop 20 percent in the past 3 1/2 weeks.”
Ouch!!
Now I know someone is going to come out and claim to have a better source than Norris or a realtor who knows better.
I know 2500 sq’ houses eventually will be $150k in TV all day long. Those looking for bargains will look for prices under that. When? If they let the REOs out then….tommorow. That probably won’t happen tommorow, so we’ll have to wait until the market is no longer grossly manipulated.
As for RealtyTrac. Yes you are correct it is inaccurate. It often shows “sold” for a house when it merely sold back to the bank at the courthouse. Tons and tons of REOs are not listed on RT. RT readily admits that there are 80k REOs hidden from veiw in CA. When an REO goes to retail auction it drops off RT after the auction date whether it sells or not.
I attended a Williams and Williams auction on a 3500 sq’ house on 5 acres in the wine area. It sold to an on-line bidder (probably fake) for something like $250k. Of course the bank refused to take it, but now it just sits as part of the shadow inv. So I think you are correct in critisizing RT but for the wrong reasons, they actually under-report.
If I had a link to Jesus Christ’s own REO figures you cheerleaders would say my souces are unreliable. The one thing you can’t escape is that ALL sources show an ugly, ugly picture THAT IS QUICKLY GETTING UGLIER and one thing you can’t provide is an alternative report that shows anything but lots more pain to come.
April 28, 2009 at 1:02 PM #389379Rt.66ParticipantYou only think its rediculously cheap because you’ve been conditioned to fork over way too much of your paycheck to bankers. Maybe something good can come out of this depression, maybe this is our chance to break that cycle of servitude and usury. Banks like you to think you are buying a house for $200k while you are really agreeing to pay them $500k over 30 years. We should try and make things better for us and not bankers.
Good reading some of these posts, this thread is getting fun.
Bob needs to run for office, he gets it.
How about an expert oppinion? Bruce Norris is about as expert as So Cal can offer:
http://www.dailybulletin.com/ci_12228714
Bruce is calling for an additioanl 20% drop in Riverside Co.
I think Temecula is the San Diego of Riverside. Meaning Temecula is the last hold out for stubborn high prices and has farther to fall than 20%.
This is not going to help either:
“Norris has already seen values stated on local home appraisals drop 20 percent in the past 3 1/2 weeks.”
Ouch!!
Now I know someone is going to come out and claim to have a better source than Norris or a realtor who knows better.
I know 2500 sq’ houses eventually will be $150k in TV all day long. Those looking for bargains will look for prices under that. When? If they let the REOs out then….tommorow. That probably won’t happen tommorow, so we’ll have to wait until the market is no longer grossly manipulated.
As for RealtyTrac. Yes you are correct it is inaccurate. It often shows “sold” for a house when it merely sold back to the bank at the courthouse. Tons and tons of REOs are not listed on RT. RT readily admits that there are 80k REOs hidden from veiw in CA. When an REO goes to retail auction it drops off RT after the auction date whether it sells or not.
I attended a Williams and Williams auction on a 3500 sq’ house on 5 acres in the wine area. It sold to an on-line bidder (probably fake) for something like $250k. Of course the bank refused to take it, but now it just sits as part of the shadow inv. So I think you are correct in critisizing RT but for the wrong reasons, they actually under-report.
If I had a link to Jesus Christ’s own REO figures you cheerleaders would say my souces are unreliable. The one thing you can’t escape is that ALL sources show an ugly, ugly picture THAT IS QUICKLY GETTING UGLIER and one thing you can’t provide is an alternative report that shows anything but lots more pain to come.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.