Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Brilliant blog entry from Karl Denninger
- This topic has 25 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 21, 2010 at 10:41 PM #17981September 21, 2010 at 11:32 PM #607733EugeneParticipant
[quote]In a 2010 budget blueprint unveiled Feb. 26, {that would be Feb.26, 2009. – E.} President Obama proposed that employers sponsoring 401(k) plans or other defined contribution plans should be required to offer automatic enrollment in these plans[/quote]
say what? 401k’s should be required by law to offer defined-benefit annuity plans? OMGWTFBBQ! Gubmint takeover of 401(k)’s!
BTW, I love this part: “the Obama administration is obviously scrambling to find ways to sell government debt without having to raise interest rates. ” When 10-year is at 2.59% and falling, that’s soooo hard…. But, I guess, it’s much harder to understand why 10-year is at 2.59%, if you get your econ 101 knowledge from right wing web sites rather than from “ivory tower” Keynesians.
BTW2, are you still waiting for S&P to hit 600 or did you decide to go long stocks? (Sorry, couldn’t resist)
September 21, 2010 at 11:32 PM #607819EugeneParticipant[quote]In a 2010 budget blueprint unveiled Feb. 26, {that would be Feb.26, 2009. – E.} President Obama proposed that employers sponsoring 401(k) plans or other defined contribution plans should be required to offer automatic enrollment in these plans[/quote]
say what? 401k’s should be required by law to offer defined-benefit annuity plans? OMGWTFBBQ! Gubmint takeover of 401(k)’s!
BTW, I love this part: “the Obama administration is obviously scrambling to find ways to sell government debt without having to raise interest rates. ” When 10-year is at 2.59% and falling, that’s soooo hard…. But, I guess, it’s much harder to understand why 10-year is at 2.59%, if you get your econ 101 knowledge from right wing web sites rather than from “ivory tower” Keynesians.
BTW2, are you still waiting for S&P to hit 600 or did you decide to go long stocks? (Sorry, couldn’t resist)
September 21, 2010 at 11:32 PM #608799EugeneParticipant[quote]In a 2010 budget blueprint unveiled Feb. 26, {that would be Feb.26, 2009. – E.} President Obama proposed that employers sponsoring 401(k) plans or other defined contribution plans should be required to offer automatic enrollment in these plans[/quote]
say what? 401k’s should be required by law to offer defined-benefit annuity plans? OMGWTFBBQ! Gubmint takeover of 401(k)’s!
BTW, I love this part: “the Obama administration is obviously scrambling to find ways to sell government debt without having to raise interest rates. ” When 10-year is at 2.59% and falling, that’s soooo hard…. But, I guess, it’s much harder to understand why 10-year is at 2.59%, if you get your econ 101 knowledge from right wing web sites rather than from “ivory tower” Keynesians.
BTW2, are you still waiting for S&P to hit 600 or did you decide to go long stocks? (Sorry, couldn’t resist)
September 21, 2010 at 11:32 PM #608480EugeneParticipant[quote]In a 2010 budget blueprint unveiled Feb. 26, {that would be Feb.26, 2009. – E.} President Obama proposed that employers sponsoring 401(k) plans or other defined contribution plans should be required to offer automatic enrollment in these plans[/quote]
say what? 401k’s should be required by law to offer defined-benefit annuity plans? OMGWTFBBQ! Gubmint takeover of 401(k)’s!
BTW, I love this part: “the Obama administration is obviously scrambling to find ways to sell government debt without having to raise interest rates. ” When 10-year is at 2.59% and falling, that’s soooo hard…. But, I guess, it’s much harder to understand why 10-year is at 2.59%, if you get your econ 101 knowledge from right wing web sites rather than from “ivory tower” Keynesians.
BTW2, are you still waiting for S&P to hit 600 or did you decide to go long stocks? (Sorry, couldn’t resist)
September 21, 2010 at 11:32 PM #608371EugeneParticipant[quote]In a 2010 budget blueprint unveiled Feb. 26, {that would be Feb.26, 2009. – E.} President Obama proposed that employers sponsoring 401(k) plans or other defined contribution plans should be required to offer automatic enrollment in these plans[/quote]
say what? 401k’s should be required by law to offer defined-benefit annuity plans? OMGWTFBBQ! Gubmint takeover of 401(k)’s!
BTW, I love this part: “the Obama administration is obviously scrambling to find ways to sell government debt without having to raise interest rates. ” When 10-year is at 2.59% and falling, that’s soooo hard…. But, I guess, it’s much harder to understand why 10-year is at 2.59%, if you get your econ 101 knowledge from right wing web sites rather than from “ivory tower” Keynesians.
BTW2, are you still waiting for S&P to hit 600 or did you decide to go long stocks? (Sorry, couldn’t resist)
September 22, 2010 at 12:00 AM #607753stockstradrParticipantBTW2, are you still waiting for S&P to hit 600 or did you decide to go long stocks? (Sorry, couldn’t resist)
I smartly guessed the propaganda will push indexes higher.
Meaning that recently I’ve stayed away from short positions, except for..
I (stupidly) held onto one 5%-of-portfolio put option (DEC 17 2011) on the S&P. It is presently out of the money to the tune of 40% loss. I should have dumped that option back on July 2nd when I noticed it was then in the money by +30%; selling it then would have allowed me to re-buy it TODAY.And I held my double-short position in gold against the market from $1200/ounce up to the present $1300/ounce, putting that (large) position down over 15%. That was stupid. The problem with my theory (that gold will have a major pullback) is that gold might go to $3000/ounce before that pullback is seen!
My long-the-long bond position is only up 5% because I came late to that trade.
So I’m an amateur who can make mistakes like everyone else.
September 22, 2010 at 12:00 AM #607839stockstradrParticipantBTW2, are you still waiting for S&P to hit 600 or did you decide to go long stocks? (Sorry, couldn’t resist)
I smartly guessed the propaganda will push indexes higher.
Meaning that recently I’ve stayed away from short positions, except for..
I (stupidly) held onto one 5%-of-portfolio put option (DEC 17 2011) on the S&P. It is presently out of the money to the tune of 40% loss. I should have dumped that option back on July 2nd when I noticed it was then in the money by +30%; selling it then would have allowed me to re-buy it TODAY.And I held my double-short position in gold against the market from $1200/ounce up to the present $1300/ounce, putting that (large) position down over 15%. That was stupid. The problem with my theory (that gold will have a major pullback) is that gold might go to $3000/ounce before that pullback is seen!
My long-the-long bond position is only up 5% because I came late to that trade.
So I’m an amateur who can make mistakes like everyone else.
September 22, 2010 at 12:00 AM #608819stockstradrParticipantBTW2, are you still waiting for S&P to hit 600 or did you decide to go long stocks? (Sorry, couldn’t resist)
I smartly guessed the propaganda will push indexes higher.
Meaning that recently I’ve stayed away from short positions, except for..
I (stupidly) held onto one 5%-of-portfolio put option (DEC 17 2011) on the S&P. It is presently out of the money to the tune of 40% loss. I should have dumped that option back on July 2nd when I noticed it was then in the money by +30%; selling it then would have allowed me to re-buy it TODAY.And I held my double-short position in gold against the market from $1200/ounce up to the present $1300/ounce, putting that (large) position down over 15%. That was stupid. The problem with my theory (that gold will have a major pullback) is that gold might go to $3000/ounce before that pullback is seen!
My long-the-long bond position is only up 5% because I came late to that trade.
So I’m an amateur who can make mistakes like everyone else.
September 22, 2010 at 12:00 AM #608500stockstradrParticipantBTW2, are you still waiting for S&P to hit 600 or did you decide to go long stocks? (Sorry, couldn’t resist)
I smartly guessed the propaganda will push indexes higher.
Meaning that recently I’ve stayed away from short positions, except for..
I (stupidly) held onto one 5%-of-portfolio put option (DEC 17 2011) on the S&P. It is presently out of the money to the tune of 40% loss. I should have dumped that option back on July 2nd when I noticed it was then in the money by +30%; selling it then would have allowed me to re-buy it TODAY.And I held my double-short position in gold against the market from $1200/ounce up to the present $1300/ounce, putting that (large) position down over 15%. That was stupid. The problem with my theory (that gold will have a major pullback) is that gold might go to $3000/ounce before that pullback is seen!
My long-the-long bond position is only up 5% because I came late to that trade.
So I’m an amateur who can make mistakes like everyone else.
September 22, 2010 at 12:00 AM #608391stockstradrParticipantBTW2, are you still waiting for S&P to hit 600 or did you decide to go long stocks? (Sorry, couldn’t resist)
I smartly guessed the propaganda will push indexes higher.
Meaning that recently I’ve stayed away from short positions, except for..
I (stupidly) held onto one 5%-of-portfolio put option (DEC 17 2011) on the S&P. It is presently out of the money to the tune of 40% loss. I should have dumped that option back on July 2nd when I noticed it was then in the money by +30%; selling it then would have allowed me to re-buy it TODAY.And I held my double-short position in gold against the market from $1200/ounce up to the present $1300/ounce, putting that (large) position down over 15%. That was stupid. The problem with my theory (that gold will have a major pullback) is that gold might go to $3000/ounce before that pullback is seen!
My long-the-long bond position is only up 5% because I came late to that trade.
So I’m an amateur who can make mistakes like everyone else.
September 22, 2010 at 8:16 AM #608466UCGalParticipantHow do you withdraw from your 401k and keep your job? Previous employer’s 401k funds can be rolled to a self directed IRA… but I thought you were not allowed to cash out, withdraw funds form a current employer 401k plan. (Trust me, I hate our options of funds at work – if I could roll it – I would.)
I know you can stop contributing. But if you already have funds in the 401k and do not want to give up your job… isn’t that money stuck.
September 22, 2010 at 8:16 AM #608894UCGalParticipantHow do you withdraw from your 401k and keep your job? Previous employer’s 401k funds can be rolled to a self directed IRA… but I thought you were not allowed to cash out, withdraw funds form a current employer 401k plan. (Trust me, I hate our options of funds at work – if I could roll it – I would.)
I know you can stop contributing. But if you already have funds in the 401k and do not want to give up your job… isn’t that money stuck.
September 22, 2010 at 8:16 AM #608575UCGalParticipantHow do you withdraw from your 401k and keep your job? Previous employer’s 401k funds can be rolled to a self directed IRA… but I thought you were not allowed to cash out, withdraw funds form a current employer 401k plan. (Trust me, I hate our options of funds at work – if I could roll it – I would.)
I know you can stop contributing. But if you already have funds in the 401k and do not want to give up your job… isn’t that money stuck.
September 22, 2010 at 8:16 AM #607914UCGalParticipantHow do you withdraw from your 401k and keep your job? Previous employer’s 401k funds can be rolled to a self directed IRA… but I thought you were not allowed to cash out, withdraw funds form a current employer 401k plan. (Trust me, I hate our options of funds at work – if I could roll it – I would.)
I know you can stop contributing. But if you already have funds in the 401k and do not want to give up your job… isn’t that money stuck.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.