- This topic has 405 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 3 months ago by jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2010 at 7:47 AM #571436June 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM #572817AecetiaParticipant
This is worth a listen. Clinton has some pretty good suggestions in this. He also says the Navy could probably stop it. His observations about Obama’s reactions to the disaster are pretty accurate (IMHO).
http://money.cnn.com/video/fortune/2010/06/27/f_gf_clinton_bp_oil.fortune/index.html
disclaimer- I am not a big fan of Clinton, but I think he is intelligent and his views are those of an insider.
June 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM #572912AecetiaParticipantThis is worth a listen. Clinton has some pretty good suggestions in this. He also says the Navy could probably stop it. His observations about Obama’s reactions to the disaster are pretty accurate (IMHO).
http://money.cnn.com/video/fortune/2010/06/27/f_gf_clinton_bp_oil.fortune/index.html
disclaimer- I am not a big fan of Clinton, but I think he is intelligent and his views are those of an insider.
June 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM #573424AecetiaParticipantThis is worth a listen. Clinton has some pretty good suggestions in this. He also says the Navy could probably stop it. His observations about Obama’s reactions to the disaster are pretty accurate (IMHO).
http://money.cnn.com/video/fortune/2010/06/27/f_gf_clinton_bp_oil.fortune/index.html
disclaimer- I am not a big fan of Clinton, but I think he is intelligent and his views are those of an insider.
June 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM #573529AecetiaParticipantThis is worth a listen. Clinton has some pretty good suggestions in this. He also says the Navy could probably stop it. His observations about Obama’s reactions to the disaster are pretty accurate (IMHO).
http://money.cnn.com/video/fortune/2010/06/27/f_gf_clinton_bp_oil.fortune/index.html
disclaimer- I am not a big fan of Clinton, but I think he is intelligent and his views are those of an insider.
June 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM #573824AecetiaParticipantThis is worth a listen. Clinton has some pretty good suggestions in this. He also says the Navy could probably stop it. His observations about Obama’s reactions to the disaster are pretty accurate (IMHO).
http://money.cnn.com/video/fortune/2010/06/27/f_gf_clinton_bp_oil.fortune/index.html
disclaimer- I am not a big fan of Clinton, but I think he is intelligent and his views are those of an insider.
June 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM #573928AecetiaParticipantKSMountain,
I heard it discussed all over the radio today, so it is almost on the verge of being main stream. I think you are going to lose the bet. Unfortunately, we all will lose.
Much of the enthusiasm for an atomic approach is based on reports that the Soviet Union succeeded in using nuclear blasts to seal off gas wells. Milo D. Nordyke, in a 2000 technical paper for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., described five Soviet blasts from 1966 to 1981.
June 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM #574025AecetiaParticipantKSMountain,
I heard it discussed all over the radio today, so it is almost on the verge of being main stream. I think you are going to lose the bet. Unfortunately, we all will lose.
Much of the enthusiasm for an atomic approach is based on reports that the Soviet Union succeeded in using nuclear blasts to seal off gas wells. Milo D. Nordyke, in a 2000 technical paper for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., described five Soviet blasts from 1966 to 1981.
June 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM #574548AecetiaParticipantKSMountain,
I heard it discussed all over the radio today, so it is almost on the verge of being main stream. I think you are going to lose the bet. Unfortunately, we all will lose.
Much of the enthusiasm for an atomic approach is based on reports that the Soviet Union succeeded in using nuclear blasts to seal off gas wells. Milo D. Nordyke, in a 2000 technical paper for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., described five Soviet blasts from 1966 to 1981.
June 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM #574654AecetiaParticipantKSMountain,
I heard it discussed all over the radio today, so it is almost on the verge of being main stream. I think you are going to lose the bet. Unfortunately, we all will lose.
Much of the enthusiasm for an atomic approach is based on reports that the Soviet Union succeeded in using nuclear blasts to seal off gas wells. Milo D. Nordyke, in a 2000 technical paper for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., described five Soviet blasts from 1966 to 1981.
June 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM #574952AecetiaParticipantKSMountain,
I heard it discussed all over the radio today, so it is almost on the verge of being main stream. I think you are going to lose the bet. Unfortunately, we all will lose.
Much of the enthusiasm for an atomic approach is based on reports that the Soviet Union succeeded in using nuclear blasts to seal off gas wells. Milo D. Nordyke, in a 2000 technical paper for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., described five Soviet blasts from 1966 to 1981.
June 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM #573943blahblahblahParticipantI’m just happy that Halliburton purchased offshore oil firefighting outfit Boots & Coots 10 days before the explosion. Imagine the luck! I’m sure they’ll have it under control any day now.
June 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM #574040blahblahblahParticipantI’m just happy that Halliburton purchased offshore oil firefighting outfit Boots & Coots 10 days before the explosion. Imagine the luck! I’m sure they’ll have it under control any day now.
June 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM #574563blahblahblahParticipantI’m just happy that Halliburton purchased offshore oil firefighting outfit Boots & Coots 10 days before the explosion. Imagine the luck! I’m sure they’ll have it under control any day now.
June 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM #574669blahblahblahParticipantI’m just happy that Halliburton purchased offshore oil firefighting outfit Boots & Coots 10 days before the explosion. Imagine the luck! I’m sure they’ll have it under control any day now.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.