- This topic has 405 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 4 months ago by
jpinpb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 24, 2010 at 7:47 AM #571436June 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM #572817
Aecetia
ParticipantThis is worth a listen. Clinton has some pretty good suggestions in this. He also says the Navy could probably stop it. His observations about Obama’s reactions to the disaster are pretty accurate (IMHO).
http://money.cnn.com/video/fortune/2010/06/27/f_gf_clinton_bp_oil.fortune/index.html
disclaimer- I am not a big fan of Clinton, but I think he is intelligent and his views are those of an insider.
June 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM #572912Aecetia
ParticipantThis is worth a listen. Clinton has some pretty good suggestions in this. He also says the Navy could probably stop it. His observations about Obama’s reactions to the disaster are pretty accurate (IMHO).
http://money.cnn.com/video/fortune/2010/06/27/f_gf_clinton_bp_oil.fortune/index.html
disclaimer- I am not a big fan of Clinton, but I think he is intelligent and his views are those of an insider.
June 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM #573424Aecetia
ParticipantThis is worth a listen. Clinton has some pretty good suggestions in this. He also says the Navy could probably stop it. His observations about Obama’s reactions to the disaster are pretty accurate (IMHO).
http://money.cnn.com/video/fortune/2010/06/27/f_gf_clinton_bp_oil.fortune/index.html
disclaimer- I am not a big fan of Clinton, but I think he is intelligent and his views are those of an insider.
June 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM #573529Aecetia
ParticipantThis is worth a listen. Clinton has some pretty good suggestions in this. He also says the Navy could probably stop it. His observations about Obama’s reactions to the disaster are pretty accurate (IMHO).
http://money.cnn.com/video/fortune/2010/06/27/f_gf_clinton_bp_oil.fortune/index.html
disclaimer- I am not a big fan of Clinton, but I think he is intelligent and his views are those of an insider.
June 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM #573824Aecetia
ParticipantThis is worth a listen. Clinton has some pretty good suggestions in this. He also says the Navy could probably stop it. His observations about Obama’s reactions to the disaster are pretty accurate (IMHO).
http://money.cnn.com/video/fortune/2010/06/27/f_gf_clinton_bp_oil.fortune/index.html
disclaimer- I am not a big fan of Clinton, but I think he is intelligent and his views are those of an insider.
June 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM #573928Aecetia
ParticipantKSMountain,
I heard it discussed all over the radio today, so it is almost on the verge of being main stream. I think you are going to lose the bet. Unfortunately, we all will lose.
Much of the enthusiasm for an atomic approach is based on reports that the Soviet Union succeeded in using nuclear blasts to seal off gas wells. Milo D. Nordyke, in a 2000 technical paper for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., described five Soviet blasts from 1966 to 1981.
June 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM #574025Aecetia
ParticipantKSMountain,
I heard it discussed all over the radio today, so it is almost on the verge of being main stream. I think you are going to lose the bet. Unfortunately, we all will lose.
Much of the enthusiasm for an atomic approach is based on reports that the Soviet Union succeeded in using nuclear blasts to seal off gas wells. Milo D. Nordyke, in a 2000 technical paper for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., described five Soviet blasts from 1966 to 1981.
June 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM #574548Aecetia
ParticipantKSMountain,
I heard it discussed all over the radio today, so it is almost on the verge of being main stream. I think you are going to lose the bet. Unfortunately, we all will lose.
Much of the enthusiasm for an atomic approach is based on reports that the Soviet Union succeeded in using nuclear blasts to seal off gas wells. Milo D. Nordyke, in a 2000 technical paper for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., described five Soviet blasts from 1966 to 1981.
June 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM #574654Aecetia
ParticipantKSMountain,
I heard it discussed all over the radio today, so it is almost on the verge of being main stream. I think you are going to lose the bet. Unfortunately, we all will lose.
Much of the enthusiasm for an atomic approach is based on reports that the Soviet Union succeeded in using nuclear blasts to seal off gas wells. Milo D. Nordyke, in a 2000 technical paper for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., described five Soviet blasts from 1966 to 1981.
June 30, 2010 at 1:31 PM #574952Aecetia
ParticipantKSMountain,
I heard it discussed all over the radio today, so it is almost on the verge of being main stream. I think you are going to lose the bet. Unfortunately, we all will lose.
Much of the enthusiasm for an atomic approach is based on reports that the Soviet Union succeeded in using nuclear blasts to seal off gas wells. Milo D. Nordyke, in a 2000 technical paper for the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, Calif., described five Soviet blasts from 1966 to 1981.
June 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM #573943blahblahblah
ParticipantI’m just happy that Halliburton purchased offshore oil firefighting outfit Boots & Coots 10 days before the explosion. Imagine the luck! I’m sure they’ll have it under control any day now.
June 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM #574040blahblahblah
ParticipantI’m just happy that Halliburton purchased offshore oil firefighting outfit Boots & Coots 10 days before the explosion. Imagine the luck! I’m sure they’ll have it under control any day now.
June 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM #574563blahblahblah
ParticipantI’m just happy that Halliburton purchased offshore oil firefighting outfit Boots & Coots 10 days before the explosion. Imagine the luck! I’m sure they’ll have it under control any day now.
June 30, 2010 at 1:39 PM #574669blahblahblah
ParticipantI’m just happy that Halliburton purchased offshore oil firefighting outfit Boots & Coots 10 days before the explosion. Imagine the luck! I’m sure they’ll have it under control any day now.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
