- This topic has 80 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 6 months ago by
Ex-SD.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 22, 2008 at 9:53 AM #209818May 22, 2008 at 9:57 AM #209685
gdcox
ParticipantJWM, this chart does not realy work. The quarterly chnage needs to be annualized otherwise it gives only a one quarter impact compared to the annual change one.
May 22, 2008 at 9:57 AM #209747gdcox
ParticipantJWM, this chart does not realy work. The quarterly chnage needs to be annualized otherwise it gives only a one quarter impact compared to the annual change one.
May 22, 2008 at 9:57 AM #209778gdcox
ParticipantJWM, this chart does not realy work. The quarterly chnage needs to be annualized otherwise it gives only a one quarter impact compared to the annual change one.
May 22, 2008 at 9:57 AM #209796gdcox
ParticipantJWM, this chart does not realy work. The quarterly chnage needs to be annualized otherwise it gives only a one quarter impact compared to the annual change one.
May 22, 2008 at 9:57 AM #209832gdcox
ParticipantJWM, this chart does not realy work. The quarterly chnage needs to be annualized otherwise it gives only a one quarter impact compared to the annual change one.
May 22, 2008 at 10:00 AM #209695JWM in SD
ParticipantTell that to calculated risk….
May 22, 2008 at 10:00 AM #209757JWM in SD
ParticipantTell that to calculated risk….
May 22, 2008 at 10:00 AM #209787JWM in SD
ParticipantTell that to calculated risk….
May 22, 2008 at 10:00 AM #209807JWM in SD
ParticipantTell that to calculated risk….
May 22, 2008 at 10:00 AM #209842JWM in SD
ParticipantTell that to calculated risk….
May 22, 2008 at 10:10 AM #209705cv2
ParticipantThis is not bottom yet
Look, during the housing boom, the desirable areas rose first. When that price is too high or unaffordable, flippers went to to less desirable areas. Now, the reverse is true. The less desirable area has drop about 30% in San Diego but the desirable area has not take much hit.
My guess is that we will see more drop in undesirable area until it hits the point that it is worthy while for the investors to buy as rentals. At that point, it is time to get back to market to buy at desirable area.
May 22, 2008 at 10:10 AM #209770cv2
ParticipantThis is not bottom yet
Look, during the housing boom, the desirable areas rose first. When that price is too high or unaffordable, flippers went to to less desirable areas. Now, the reverse is true. The less desirable area has drop about 30% in San Diego but the desirable area has not take much hit.
My guess is that we will see more drop in undesirable area until it hits the point that it is worthy while for the investors to buy as rentals. At that point, it is time to get back to market to buy at desirable area.
May 22, 2008 at 10:10 AM #209800cv2
ParticipantThis is not bottom yet
Look, during the housing boom, the desirable areas rose first. When that price is too high or unaffordable, flippers went to to less desirable areas. Now, the reverse is true. The less desirable area has drop about 30% in San Diego but the desirable area has not take much hit.
My guess is that we will see more drop in undesirable area until it hits the point that it is worthy while for the investors to buy as rentals. At that point, it is time to get back to market to buy at desirable area.
May 22, 2008 at 10:10 AM #209819cv2
ParticipantThis is not bottom yet
Look, during the housing boom, the desirable areas rose first. When that price is too high or unaffordable, flippers went to to less desirable areas. Now, the reverse is true. The less desirable area has drop about 30% in San Diego but the desirable area has not take much hit.
My guess is that we will see more drop in undesirable area until it hits the point that it is worthy while for the investors to buy as rentals. At that point, it is time to get back to market to buy at desirable area.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
