- This topic has 61 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 6 months ago by Allan from Fallbrook.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 19, 2013 at 4:08 PM #761420April 19, 2013 at 4:13 PM #761421SK in CVParticipant
Do you mean that prospective immigrants should all be asked the following question?
“when your nephews set off a bomb at the boston marathon, will you be supportive of them?”
And if they say yes, don’t let them in. And if they say no, don’t let them in because her nephews are terrorists.
Does that work for you?
April 19, 2013 at 4:33 PM #761422ltsdddParticipant[quote=SK in CV]Do you mean that prospective immigrants should all be asked the following question?
“when your nephews set off a bomb at the boston marathon, will you be supportive of them?”
And if they say yes, don’t let them in. And if they say no, don’t let them in because her nephews are terrorists.
Does that work for you?[/quote]
In your mind, the 9-11 attack was a fabrication? Planes flew into buildings resulted in thousands of deaths were just a setup?
April 19, 2013 at 5:15 PM #761423SK in CVParticipant[quote=ltsdd][quote=SK in CV]Do you mean that prospective immigrants should all be asked the following question?
“when your nephews set off a bomb at the boston marathon, will you be supportive of them?”
And if they say yes, don’t let them in. And if they say no, don’t let them in because her nephews are terrorists.
Does that work for you?[/quote]
In your mind, the 9-11 attack was a fabrication? Planes flew into buildings resulted in thousands of deaths were just a setup?[/quote]
So now you’re just making shit up. I didn’t say anything like that, and neither did she. So I’ll ask again, what exactly do you mean by “like this”?
April 19, 2013 at 5:29 PM #761425ltsdddParticipant[quote=SK in CV][quote=ltsdd][quote=SK in CV]Do you mean that prospective immigrants should all be asked the following question?
“when your nephews set off a bomb at the boston marathon, will you be supportive of them?”
And if they say yes, don’t let them in. And if they say no, don’t let them in because her nephews are terrorists.
Does that work for you?[/quote]
In your mind, the 9-11 attack was a fabrication? Planes flew into buildings resulted in thousands of deaths were just a setup?[/quote]
So now you’re just making shit up. I didn’t say anything like that, and neither did she. So I’ll ask again, what exactly do you mean by “like this”?[/quote]
Maybe I read too much into her quote regarding her having “doubts about the story behind the 9-11 attacks”. Those guys were all angels.
April 19, 2013 at 5:41 PM #761426ltsdddParticipant[quote=SK in CV]what exactly do you mean by “like this”?[/quote]
It had nothing to do with her ethnicity, nationality or religious belief. It had to do with her mindset and doubts regarding the 9-11 attacks.
April 19, 2013 at 5:42 PM #761427SK in CVParticipant[quote=ltsdd]Maybe I read too much into her quote regarding her having “doubts about the story behind the 9-11 attacks”. Those guys were all angels.[/quote]
That puts her opinion right in line with a significant number of americans. Should they all have their citizenship revoked? Five years ago, almost 40% of Canadians were unsure that AQ carried out the attack. So should we lock our northern border?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polls_about_9/11_conspiracy_theories
April 19, 2013 at 5:46 PM #761428ltsdddParticipant[quote=SK in CV][quote=ltsdd]Maybe I read too much into her quote regarding her having “doubts about the story behind the 9-11 attacks”. Those guys were all angels.[/quote]
That puts her opinion right in line with a significant number of americans. Should they all have their citizenship revoked? Five years ago, almost 40% of Canadians were unsure that AQ carried out the attack. So should we lock our northern border?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polls_about_9/11_conspiracy_theories%5B/quote%5D
That’s fair enough. So, in your opinion, who do you think was behind the 9/11 attack?
April 19, 2013 at 5:49 PM #761429SK in CVParticipant[quote=ltsdd]
That’s fair enough. So, in your opinion, who do you think was behind the 9/11 attack?[/quote]Not Saddam Hussein.
April 19, 2013 at 5:55 PM #761430bobbyParticipantI wonder if she has a job? Her coworkers will unlikely be very friendly to her now.
April 19, 2013 at 6:26 PM #761431ltsdddParticipant[quote=SK in CV][quote=ltsdd]
That’s fair enough. So, in your opinion, who do you think was behind the 9/11 attack?[/quote]Not Saddam Hussein.[/quote]
You’re a real genius.
April 19, 2013 at 6:32 PM #761432SK in CVParticipant[quote=ltsdd][quote=SK in CV][quote=ltsdd]
That’s fair enough. So, in your opinion, who do you think was behind the 9/11 attack?[/quote]Not Saddam Hussein.[/quote]
You’re a real genius.[/quote]
Thanks. Mensa thinks so too. Now go back and read what I wrote, and show me where I said anything remotely resembling a disbelief in the official story.
April 19, 2013 at 9:01 PM #761434paramountParticipant[quote=urbanrealtor]
Not per se (as far as I am aware).
There are instances of terrorist acts committed by anti-government fundamentalists who claim constitutional justification.
The tea party movement does fall under the rubric of anti government constitutional fundamentalism.
And most fundamentalist movements have common threads.
People use a religious text that explicitly forbids killing and suicide to justify suicide bombings.
Similarly, people use the US constitution to justify militant violence in some sort of defense of the constitution (eg: OKC). Mind you the government systems being attacked have been upheld by the SCOTUS whose authority is explicit in article 3.The original tea party (as committed by the sons of liberty) was a violent uprising against non-representative authority.
So its not a big leap to half-expect anti-government violence from a fundamentalist group that glorifies past anti-government violence.[/quote]
Spoken like a true socialist communist marxist fascist.
April 20, 2013 at 7:30 AM #761437ltsdddParticipant[quote=SK in CV]Now go back and read what I wrote, and show me where I said anything remotely resembling a disbelief in the official story.[/quote]
You’re right. You didn’t say such thing. You’re making shit up if you’re saying I accused you of saying such thing.
The fact is this:
1. You had issue with me having issue with letting that woman, who’s doubting the 9/11 attacks, into our country (granted, she’s a “Canadian”).
2. You provided a wiki link to show that that woman is not the only one thinking that
3. Your answer to the question who were behind the 9/11 attack was “not Saddam Hussein”.I know nothing about you. So, please do tell what’s the “official story” of the 9/11 that you believe in.
April 20, 2013 at 7:33 AM #761438desmondParticipantSK it sounds like you were trying to blame itsdd for a “you people” comment but when ur brought up the Tea Party you had no problem with that?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.