- This topic has 20 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
GoUSC.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
January 27, 2008 at 12:35 PM #11642
-
January 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #143470
kewp
ParticipantI like Mish’s annotated version:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/beautiful-model-for-fraud.html
-
January 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM #143475
Anonymous
GuestA bunch of crooks involved in the transaction up and down the chain that should be in orange jumpsuits. But I don’t subscribe to the notion that the home buyer is a child that is to be held blameless in the transaction.
-
January 27, 2008 at 2:24 PM #143490
HereWeGo
ParticipantEh, I prefer Tanta’s “Compleat Ubernerd” writings over at CR.
Securitization has been with us for a very long time, and it’s a pretty good idea as long as underwriting standards are upheld. Of course, if the underwriting standard becomes “Able to fog a mirror, generally”, that’s a different story.
I’d like to know how what percentage of MBS that were eligible for GSE purchase were actually sold to the GSE. If almost all such loans were sold to the GSEs, what’s that tell you about the loans remaining in the banks’ portfolios and, worse yet, the loans they sold into the private MBS market?
-
January 27, 2008 at 9:13 PM #143676
GoUSC
ParticipantI follow Mish and Tanta/CR pretty extensively. Lenders and borrowers are all responsible to this mess. Still I thought the article was concise and to the point. Plus the people around me I am trying to get to understand what is going on are much more likely to believe an article from this source than a Blog.
-
January 27, 2008 at 9:13 PM #143912
GoUSC
ParticipantI follow Mish and Tanta/CR pretty extensively. Lenders and borrowers are all responsible to this mess. Still I thought the article was concise and to the point. Plus the people around me I am trying to get to understand what is going on are much more likely to believe an article from this source than a Blog.
-
January 27, 2008 at 9:13 PM #143918
GoUSC
ParticipantI follow Mish and Tanta/CR pretty extensively. Lenders and borrowers are all responsible to this mess. Still I thought the article was concise and to the point. Plus the people around me I am trying to get to understand what is going on are much more likely to believe an article from this source than a Blog.
-
January 27, 2008 at 9:13 PM #143945
GoUSC
ParticipantI follow Mish and Tanta/CR pretty extensively. Lenders and borrowers are all responsible to this mess. Still I thought the article was concise and to the point. Plus the people around me I am trying to get to understand what is going on are much more likely to believe an article from this source than a Blog.
-
January 27, 2008 at 9:13 PM #144014
GoUSC
ParticipantI follow Mish and Tanta/CR pretty extensively. Lenders and borrowers are all responsible to this mess. Still I thought the article was concise and to the point. Plus the people around me I am trying to get to understand what is going on are much more likely to believe an article from this source than a Blog.
-
January 27, 2008 at 2:24 PM #143733
HereWeGo
ParticipantEh, I prefer Tanta’s “Compleat Ubernerd” writings over at CR.
Securitization has been with us for a very long time, and it’s a pretty good idea as long as underwriting standards are upheld. Of course, if the underwriting standard becomes “Able to fog a mirror, generally”, that’s a different story.
I’d like to know how what percentage of MBS that were eligible for GSE purchase were actually sold to the GSE. If almost all such loans were sold to the GSEs, what’s that tell you about the loans remaining in the banks’ portfolios and, worse yet, the loans they sold into the private MBS market?
-
January 27, 2008 at 2:24 PM #143739
HereWeGo
ParticipantEh, I prefer Tanta’s “Compleat Ubernerd” writings over at CR.
Securitization has been with us for a very long time, and it’s a pretty good idea as long as underwriting standards are upheld. Of course, if the underwriting standard becomes “Able to fog a mirror, generally”, that’s a different story.
I’d like to know how what percentage of MBS that were eligible for GSE purchase were actually sold to the GSE. If almost all such loans were sold to the GSEs, what’s that tell you about the loans remaining in the banks’ portfolios and, worse yet, the loans they sold into the private MBS market?
-
January 27, 2008 at 2:24 PM #143765
HereWeGo
ParticipantEh, I prefer Tanta’s “Compleat Ubernerd” writings over at CR.
Securitization has been with us for a very long time, and it’s a pretty good idea as long as underwriting standards are upheld. Of course, if the underwriting standard becomes “Able to fog a mirror, generally”, that’s a different story.
I’d like to know how what percentage of MBS that were eligible for GSE purchase were actually sold to the GSE. If almost all such loans were sold to the GSEs, what’s that tell you about the loans remaining in the banks’ portfolios and, worse yet, the loans they sold into the private MBS market?
-
January 27, 2008 at 2:24 PM #143832
HereWeGo
ParticipantEh, I prefer Tanta’s “Compleat Ubernerd” writings over at CR.
Securitization has been with us for a very long time, and it’s a pretty good idea as long as underwriting standards are upheld. Of course, if the underwriting standard becomes “Able to fog a mirror, generally”, that’s a different story.
I’d like to know how what percentage of MBS that were eligible for GSE purchase were actually sold to the GSE. If almost all such loans were sold to the GSEs, what’s that tell you about the loans remaining in the banks’ portfolios and, worse yet, the loans they sold into the private MBS market?
-
-
January 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM #143717
Anonymous
GuestA bunch of crooks involved in the transaction up and down the chain that should be in orange jumpsuits. But I don’t subscribe to the notion that the home buyer is a child that is to be held blameless in the transaction.
-
January 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM #143724
Anonymous
GuestA bunch of crooks involved in the transaction up and down the chain that should be in orange jumpsuits. But I don’t subscribe to the notion that the home buyer is a child that is to be held blameless in the transaction.
-
January 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM #143749
Anonymous
GuestA bunch of crooks involved in the transaction up and down the chain that should be in orange jumpsuits. But I don’t subscribe to the notion that the home buyer is a child that is to be held blameless in the transaction.
-
January 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM #143818
Anonymous
GuestA bunch of crooks involved in the transaction up and down the chain that should be in orange jumpsuits. But I don’t subscribe to the notion that the home buyer is a child that is to be held blameless in the transaction.
-
-
January 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #143712
kewp
ParticipantI like Mish’s annotated version:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/beautiful-model-for-fraud.html
-
January 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #143720
kewp
ParticipantI like Mish’s annotated version:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/beautiful-model-for-fraud.html
-
January 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #143745
kewp
ParticipantI like Mish’s annotated version:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/beautiful-model-for-fraud.html
-
January 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #143813
kewp
ParticipantI like Mish’s annotated version:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/beautiful-model-for-fraud.html
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.