- This topic has 20 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 10 months ago by GoUSC.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 27, 2008 at 12:35 PM #11642January 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #143470kewpParticipant
I like Mish’s annotated version:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/beautiful-model-for-fraud.html
January 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #143712kewpParticipantI like Mish’s annotated version:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/beautiful-model-for-fraud.html
January 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #143720kewpParticipantI like Mish’s annotated version:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/beautiful-model-for-fraud.html
January 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #143813kewpParticipantI like Mish’s annotated version:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/beautiful-model-for-fraud.html
January 27, 2008 at 1:21 PM #143745kewpParticipantI like Mish’s annotated version:
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/01/beautiful-model-for-fraud.html
January 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM #143475AnonymousGuestA bunch of crooks involved in the transaction up and down the chain that should be in orange jumpsuits. But I don’t subscribe to the notion that the home buyer is a child that is to be held blameless in the transaction.
January 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM #143818AnonymousGuestA bunch of crooks involved in the transaction up and down the chain that should be in orange jumpsuits. But I don’t subscribe to the notion that the home buyer is a child that is to be held blameless in the transaction.
January 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM #143717AnonymousGuestA bunch of crooks involved in the transaction up and down the chain that should be in orange jumpsuits. But I don’t subscribe to the notion that the home buyer is a child that is to be held blameless in the transaction.
January 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM #143724AnonymousGuestA bunch of crooks involved in the transaction up and down the chain that should be in orange jumpsuits. But I don’t subscribe to the notion that the home buyer is a child that is to be held blameless in the transaction.
January 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM #143749AnonymousGuestA bunch of crooks involved in the transaction up and down the chain that should be in orange jumpsuits. But I don’t subscribe to the notion that the home buyer is a child that is to be held blameless in the transaction.
January 27, 2008 at 2:24 PM #143739HereWeGoParticipantEh, I prefer Tanta’s “Compleat Ubernerd” writings over at CR.
Securitization has been with us for a very long time, and it’s a pretty good idea as long as underwriting standards are upheld. Of course, if the underwriting standard becomes “Able to fog a mirror, generally”, that’s a different story.
I’d like to know how what percentage of MBS that were eligible for GSE purchase were actually sold to the GSE. If almost all such loans were sold to the GSEs, what’s that tell you about the loans remaining in the banks’ portfolios and, worse yet, the loans they sold into the private MBS market?
January 27, 2008 at 2:24 PM #143832HereWeGoParticipantEh, I prefer Tanta’s “Compleat Ubernerd” writings over at CR.
Securitization has been with us for a very long time, and it’s a pretty good idea as long as underwriting standards are upheld. Of course, if the underwriting standard becomes “Able to fog a mirror, generally”, that’s a different story.
I’d like to know how what percentage of MBS that were eligible for GSE purchase were actually sold to the GSE. If almost all such loans were sold to the GSEs, what’s that tell you about the loans remaining in the banks’ portfolios and, worse yet, the loans they sold into the private MBS market?
January 27, 2008 at 2:24 PM #143765HereWeGoParticipantEh, I prefer Tanta’s “Compleat Ubernerd” writings over at CR.
Securitization has been with us for a very long time, and it’s a pretty good idea as long as underwriting standards are upheld. Of course, if the underwriting standard becomes “Able to fog a mirror, generally”, that’s a different story.
I’d like to know how what percentage of MBS that were eligible for GSE purchase were actually sold to the GSE. If almost all such loans were sold to the GSEs, what’s that tell you about the loans remaining in the banks’ portfolios and, worse yet, the loans they sold into the private MBS market?
January 27, 2008 at 2:24 PM #143733HereWeGoParticipantEh, I prefer Tanta’s “Compleat Ubernerd” writings over at CR.
Securitization has been with us for a very long time, and it’s a pretty good idea as long as underwriting standards are upheld. Of course, if the underwriting standard becomes “Able to fog a mirror, generally”, that’s a different story.
I’d like to know how what percentage of MBS that were eligible for GSE purchase were actually sold to the GSE. If almost all such loans were sold to the GSEs, what’s that tell you about the loans remaining in the banks’ portfolios and, worse yet, the loans they sold into the private MBS market?
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.