- This topic has 420 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 1 month ago by
sd_matt.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 31, 2009 at 8:16 AM #451735August 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM #450938
scaredyclassic
Participantbut only men define wickedness…
does wickedness even exist without man?
And you need to have more than one person for wickedness. one person alone cannot be wicked. you ahve to have someone there to pronounce iti wicked.
August 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM #451130Participantbut only men define wickedness…
does wickedness even exist without man?
And you need to have more than one person for wickedness. one person alone cannot be wicked. you ahve to have someone there to pronounce iti wicked.
August 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM #451472Participantbut only men define wickedness…
does wickedness even exist without man?
And you need to have more than one person for wickedness. one person alone cannot be wicked. you ahve to have someone there to pronounce iti wicked.
August 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM #451547Participantbut only men define wickedness…
does wickedness even exist without man?
And you need to have more than one person for wickedness. one person alone cannot be wicked. you ahve to have someone there to pronounce iti wicked.
August 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM #451740Participantbut only men define wickedness…
does wickedness even exist without man?
And you need to have more than one person for wickedness. one person alone cannot be wicked. you ahve to have someone there to pronounce iti wicked.
August 31, 2009 at 8:54 PM #451260Aecetia
ParticipantI agree with you Cardiff about the evil done by Garrido and his wife and for some reason I am more repulsed by her willingness to allow him to victimize the child. His is pure evil and her evil is benign, but in its own way, it is worse. She reminds me of a mother who let’s her child be molested to maintain the status quo. I hope they never see have freedom again.
August 31, 2009 at 8:54 PM #451454ParticipantI agree with you Cardiff about the evil done by Garrido and his wife and for some reason I am more repulsed by her willingness to allow him to victimize the child. His is pure evil and her evil is benign, but in its own way, it is worse. She reminds me of a mother who let’s her child be molested to maintain the status quo. I hope they never see have freedom again.
August 31, 2009 at 8:54 PM #451799ParticipantI agree with you Cardiff about the evil done by Garrido and his wife and for some reason I am more repulsed by her willingness to allow him to victimize the child. His is pure evil and her evil is benign, but in its own way, it is worse. She reminds me of a mother who let’s her child be molested to maintain the status quo. I hope they never see have freedom again.
August 31, 2009 at 8:54 PM #451870ParticipantI agree with you Cardiff about the evil done by Garrido and his wife and for some reason I am more repulsed by her willingness to allow him to victimize the child. His is pure evil and her evil is benign, but in its own way, it is worse. She reminds me of a mother who let’s her child be molested to maintain the status quo. I hope they never see have freedom again.
August 31, 2009 at 8:54 PM #452061ParticipantI agree with you Cardiff about the evil done by Garrido and his wife and for some reason I am more repulsed by her willingness to allow him to victimize the child. His is pure evil and her evil is benign, but in its own way, it is worse. She reminds me of a mother who let’s her child be molested to maintain the status quo. I hope they never see have freedom again.
August 31, 2009 at 11:06 PM #451296Dukehorn
ParticipantThe suggestion that all internet conversations will eventually boil down to Hilter is called Godwin’s Law (well I’m paraphrasing)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Went to school with Mike, he’s a smart fellow.
Of course, this is most basic corollary (which will tell you who should be losing the healthcare debate).
By 2007, The Economist had declared that “a good rule in most discussions is that the first person to call the other a Nazi automatically loses the argument.”
August 31, 2009 at 11:06 PM #451489ParticipantThe suggestion that all internet conversations will eventually boil down to Hilter is called Godwin’s Law (well I’m paraphrasing)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Went to school with Mike, he’s a smart fellow.
Of course, this is most basic corollary (which will tell you who should be losing the healthcare debate).
By 2007, The Economist had declared that “a good rule in most discussions is that the first person to call the other a Nazi automatically loses the argument.”
August 31, 2009 at 11:06 PM #451834ParticipantThe suggestion that all internet conversations will eventually boil down to Hilter is called Godwin’s Law (well I’m paraphrasing)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Went to school with Mike, he’s a smart fellow.
Of course, this is most basic corollary (which will tell you who should be losing the healthcare debate).
By 2007, The Economist had declared that “a good rule in most discussions is that the first person to call the other a Nazi automatically loses the argument.”
August 31, 2009 at 11:06 PM #451905ParticipantThe suggestion that all internet conversations will eventually boil down to Hilter is called Godwin’s Law (well I’m paraphrasing)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Went to school with Mike, he’s a smart fellow.
Of course, this is most basic corollary (which will tell you who should be losing the healthcare debate).
By 2007, The Economist had declared that “a good rule in most discussions is that the first person to call the other a Nazi automatically loses the argument.”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
