- This topic has 420 replies, 24 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 2 months ago by sd_matt.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 31, 2009 at 8:16 AM #451735August 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM #450938scaredyclassicParticipant
but only men define wickedness…
does wickedness even exist without man?
And you need to have more than one person for wickedness. one person alone cannot be wicked. you ahve to have someone there to pronounce iti wicked.
August 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM #451130scaredyclassicParticipantbut only men define wickedness…
does wickedness even exist without man?
And you need to have more than one person for wickedness. one person alone cannot be wicked. you ahve to have someone there to pronounce iti wicked.
August 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM #451472scaredyclassicParticipantbut only men define wickedness…
does wickedness even exist without man?
And you need to have more than one person for wickedness. one person alone cannot be wicked. you ahve to have someone there to pronounce iti wicked.
August 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM #451547scaredyclassicParticipantbut only men define wickedness…
does wickedness even exist without man?
And you need to have more than one person for wickedness. one person alone cannot be wicked. you ahve to have someone there to pronounce iti wicked.
August 31, 2009 at 12:59 PM #451740scaredyclassicParticipantbut only men define wickedness…
does wickedness even exist without man?
And you need to have more than one person for wickedness. one person alone cannot be wicked. you ahve to have someone there to pronounce iti wicked.
August 31, 2009 at 8:54 PM #451260AecetiaParticipantI agree with you Cardiff about the evil done by Garrido and his wife and for some reason I am more repulsed by her willingness to allow him to victimize the child. His is pure evil and her evil is benign, but in its own way, it is worse. She reminds me of a mother who let’s her child be molested to maintain the status quo. I hope they never see have freedom again.
August 31, 2009 at 8:54 PM #451454AecetiaParticipantI agree with you Cardiff about the evil done by Garrido and his wife and for some reason I am more repulsed by her willingness to allow him to victimize the child. His is pure evil and her evil is benign, but in its own way, it is worse. She reminds me of a mother who let’s her child be molested to maintain the status quo. I hope they never see have freedom again.
August 31, 2009 at 8:54 PM #451799AecetiaParticipantI agree with you Cardiff about the evil done by Garrido and his wife and for some reason I am more repulsed by her willingness to allow him to victimize the child. His is pure evil and her evil is benign, but in its own way, it is worse. She reminds me of a mother who let’s her child be molested to maintain the status quo. I hope they never see have freedom again.
August 31, 2009 at 8:54 PM #451870AecetiaParticipantI agree with you Cardiff about the evil done by Garrido and his wife and for some reason I am more repulsed by her willingness to allow him to victimize the child. His is pure evil and her evil is benign, but in its own way, it is worse. She reminds me of a mother who let’s her child be molested to maintain the status quo. I hope they never see have freedom again.
August 31, 2009 at 8:54 PM #452061AecetiaParticipantI agree with you Cardiff about the evil done by Garrido and his wife and for some reason I am more repulsed by her willingness to allow him to victimize the child. His is pure evil and her evil is benign, but in its own way, it is worse. She reminds me of a mother who let’s her child be molested to maintain the status quo. I hope they never see have freedom again.
August 31, 2009 at 11:06 PM #451296DukehornParticipantThe suggestion that all internet conversations will eventually boil down to Hilter is called Godwin’s Law (well I’m paraphrasing)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Went to school with Mike, he’s a smart fellow.
Of course, this is most basic corollary (which will tell you who should be losing the healthcare debate).
By 2007, The Economist had declared that “a good rule in most discussions is that the first person to call the other a Nazi automatically loses the argument.”
August 31, 2009 at 11:06 PM #451489DukehornParticipantThe suggestion that all internet conversations will eventually boil down to Hilter is called Godwin’s Law (well I’m paraphrasing)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Went to school with Mike, he’s a smart fellow.
Of course, this is most basic corollary (which will tell you who should be losing the healthcare debate).
By 2007, The Economist had declared that “a good rule in most discussions is that the first person to call the other a Nazi automatically loses the argument.”
August 31, 2009 at 11:06 PM #451834DukehornParticipantThe suggestion that all internet conversations will eventually boil down to Hilter is called Godwin’s Law (well I’m paraphrasing)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Went to school with Mike, he’s a smart fellow.
Of course, this is most basic corollary (which will tell you who should be losing the healthcare debate).
By 2007, The Economist had declared that “a good rule in most discussions is that the first person to call the other a Nazi automatically loses the argument.”
August 31, 2009 at 11:06 PM #451905DukehornParticipantThe suggestion that all internet conversations will eventually boil down to Hilter is called Godwin’s Law (well I’m paraphrasing)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Went to school with Mike, he’s a smart fellow.
Of course, this is most basic corollary (which will tell you who should be losing the healthcare debate).
By 2007, The Economist had declared that “a good rule in most discussions is that the first person to call the other a Nazi automatically loses the argument.”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.