- This topic has 565 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM #162214February 28, 2008 at 10:39 AM #161832
Anonymous
GuestIt appears that there are fiancial geniuses here…
(or is that in his or her own mind?)I understand from the public issues that many cases exist in the state of California (as in other states) similar to this incident. The situation appears to result from financil naivety rather than stupidity. Stupidity lies with those who have been caught and look at possible incarceration.
R/
ERADICATORFebruary 28, 2008 at 10:39 AM #162126Anonymous
GuestIt appears that there are fiancial geniuses here…
(or is that in his or her own mind?)I understand from the public issues that many cases exist in the state of California (as in other states) similar to this incident. The situation appears to result from financil naivety rather than stupidity. Stupidity lies with those who have been caught and look at possible incarceration.
R/
ERADICATORFebruary 28, 2008 at 10:39 AM #162143Anonymous
GuestIt appears that there are fiancial geniuses here…
(or is that in his or her own mind?)I understand from the public issues that many cases exist in the state of California (as in other states) similar to this incident. The situation appears to result from financil naivety rather than stupidity. Stupidity lies with those who have been caught and look at possible incarceration.
R/
ERADICATORFebruary 28, 2008 at 10:39 AM #162160Anonymous
GuestIt appears that there are fiancial geniuses here…
(or is that in his or her own mind?)I understand from the public issues that many cases exist in the state of California (as in other states) similar to this incident. The situation appears to result from financil naivety rather than stupidity. Stupidity lies with those who have been caught and look at possible incarceration.
R/
ERADICATORFebruary 28, 2008 at 10:39 AM #162229Anonymous
GuestIt appears that there are fiancial geniuses here…
(or is that in his or her own mind?)I understand from the public issues that many cases exist in the state of California (as in other states) similar to this incident. The situation appears to result from financil naivety rather than stupidity. Stupidity lies with those who have been caught and look at possible incarceration.
R/
ERADICATORFebruary 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM #161852nostradamus
ParticipantCbC I’m starting to understand how you were so easily conned…
I had 3 points in my post and you missed all of them. To make it simple for you:
1. I respect freedom of speech.
2. Willy-nilly lawsuits are bad.
3. Kike is not a term for Italians. It is used to denigrate Jews.mmmkay?
February 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM #162146nostradamus
ParticipantCbC I’m starting to understand how you were so easily conned…
I had 3 points in my post and you missed all of them. To make it simple for you:
1. I respect freedom of speech.
2. Willy-nilly lawsuits are bad.
3. Kike is not a term for Italians. It is used to denigrate Jews.mmmkay?
February 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM #162163nostradamus
ParticipantCbC I’m starting to understand how you were so easily conned…
I had 3 points in my post and you missed all of them. To make it simple for you:
1. I respect freedom of speech.
2. Willy-nilly lawsuits are bad.
3. Kike is not a term for Italians. It is used to denigrate Jews.mmmkay?
February 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM #162180nostradamus
ParticipantCbC I’m starting to understand how you were so easily conned…
I had 3 points in my post and you missed all of them. To make it simple for you:
1. I respect freedom of speech.
2. Willy-nilly lawsuits are bad.
3. Kike is not a term for Italians. It is used to denigrate Jews.mmmkay?
February 28, 2008 at 10:51 AM #162249nostradamus
ParticipantCbC I’m starting to understand how you were so easily conned…
I had 3 points in my post and you missed all of them. To make it simple for you:
1. I respect freedom of speech.
2. Willy-nilly lawsuits are bad.
3. Kike is not a term for Italians. It is used to denigrate Jews.mmmkay?
February 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM #161857SD Realtor
ParticipantConned by Crooks
If you follow the link I provided the case is in court due to receivership but that has nothing to do with criminal charges.
SD Realtor
February 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM #162151SD Realtor
ParticipantConned by Crooks
If you follow the link I provided the case is in court due to receivership but that has nothing to do with criminal charges.
SD Realtor
February 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM #162168SD Realtor
ParticipantConned by Crooks
If you follow the link I provided the case is in court due to receivership but that has nothing to do with criminal charges.
SD Realtor
February 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM #162185SD Realtor
ParticipantConned by Crooks
If you follow the link I provided the case is in court due to receivership but that has nothing to do with criminal charges.
SD Realtor
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.