- This topic has 140 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by Ash Housewares.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 4, 2009 at 2:22 PM #478406November 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM #477577ArrayaParticipant
The pensions are full of wall street promises.
November 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM #477747ArrayaParticipantThe pensions are full of wall street promises.
November 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM #478116ArrayaParticipantThe pensions are full of wall street promises.
November 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM #478196ArrayaParticipantThe pensions are full of wall street promises.
November 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM #478417ArrayaParticipantThe pensions are full of wall street promises.
November 4, 2009 at 2:47 PM #477597DWCAPParticipant[quote=Ash Housewares]
For what it’s worth, public employees in my profession and experience level make about 40% more than their private sector counterparts in raw salary; I’m not even counting the extra benefits like retirement pay. I’d vote for something along the lines of public salary=private salary*frac, where frac could be negotiated by profession but ideally around 0.8 to account for the retirement perks.[/quote]What do you do and how do I get to do it too?
November 4, 2009 at 2:47 PM #477767DWCAPParticipant[quote=Ash Housewares]
For what it’s worth, public employees in my profession and experience level make about 40% more than their private sector counterparts in raw salary; I’m not even counting the extra benefits like retirement pay. I’d vote for something along the lines of public salary=private salary*frac, where frac could be negotiated by profession but ideally around 0.8 to account for the retirement perks.[/quote]What do you do and how do I get to do it too?
November 4, 2009 at 2:47 PM #478135DWCAPParticipant[quote=Ash Housewares]
For what it’s worth, public employees in my profession and experience level make about 40% more than their private sector counterparts in raw salary; I’m not even counting the extra benefits like retirement pay. I’d vote for something along the lines of public salary=private salary*frac, where frac could be negotiated by profession but ideally around 0.8 to account for the retirement perks.[/quote]What do you do and how do I get to do it too?
November 4, 2009 at 2:47 PM #478217DWCAPParticipant[quote=Ash Housewares]
For what it’s worth, public employees in my profession and experience level make about 40% more than their private sector counterparts in raw salary; I’m not even counting the extra benefits like retirement pay. I’d vote for something along the lines of public salary=private salary*frac, where frac could be negotiated by profession but ideally around 0.8 to account for the retirement perks.[/quote]What do you do and how do I get to do it too?
November 4, 2009 at 2:47 PM #478437DWCAPParticipant[quote=Ash Housewares]
For what it’s worth, public employees in my profession and experience level make about 40% more than their private sector counterparts in raw salary; I’m not even counting the extra benefits like retirement pay. I’d vote for something along the lines of public salary=private salary*frac, where frac could be negotiated by profession but ideally around 0.8 to account for the retirement perks.[/quote]What do you do and how do I get to do it too?
November 4, 2009 at 4:26 PM #477652AnonymousGuestI agree with DWCAP fully. 1. How do I get the job where public is paying in any aspect hirer than the private sector. 2. Bring “public managment” figures into reality and make them pay into there pensions. They are making the big bucks (still nowhere near the private sector) pension benefits should be for the front line guys who do the work and do not make a king’s ransom. You would have to sell it to the top dogs, but might be easier to do if the majority understand it might save their pension. I think a guy that sweeps your streets for 30,000 a year for 30 years deserves 3% or 2% at 60, since most are not going to get SS.
November 4, 2009 at 4:26 PM #477823AnonymousGuestI agree with DWCAP fully. 1. How do I get the job where public is paying in any aspect hirer than the private sector. 2. Bring “public managment” figures into reality and make them pay into there pensions. They are making the big bucks (still nowhere near the private sector) pension benefits should be for the front line guys who do the work and do not make a king’s ransom. You would have to sell it to the top dogs, but might be easier to do if the majority understand it might save their pension. I think a guy that sweeps your streets for 30,000 a year for 30 years deserves 3% or 2% at 60, since most are not going to get SS.
November 4, 2009 at 4:26 PM #478190AnonymousGuestI agree with DWCAP fully. 1. How do I get the job where public is paying in any aspect hirer than the private sector. 2. Bring “public managment” figures into reality and make them pay into there pensions. They are making the big bucks (still nowhere near the private sector) pension benefits should be for the front line guys who do the work and do not make a king’s ransom. You would have to sell it to the top dogs, but might be easier to do if the majority understand it might save their pension. I think a guy that sweeps your streets for 30,000 a year for 30 years deserves 3% or 2% at 60, since most are not going to get SS.
November 4, 2009 at 4:26 PM #478270AnonymousGuestI agree with DWCAP fully. 1. How do I get the job where public is paying in any aspect hirer than the private sector. 2. Bring “public managment” figures into reality and make them pay into there pensions. They are making the big bucks (still nowhere near the private sector) pension benefits should be for the front line guys who do the work and do not make a king’s ransom. You would have to sell it to the top dogs, but might be easier to do if the majority understand it might save their pension. I think a guy that sweeps your streets for 30,000 a year for 30 years deserves 3% or 2% at 60, since most are not going to get SS.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.