- This topic has 60 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 8 months ago by sdnerd.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 13, 2008 at 1:19 AM #168769March 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM #168808TheBreezeParticipant
Who would think there are an infinite supply of 32 bit integers?
Allow me to re-phrase: Who woulda’ thunk that we couldn’t just add more internet addresses as needed? I mean, certainly Internet addresses are easier to create than say something like oil right? All you do is add a few more bits, right? If you’d have bet the inventor of the Internet (Al Gore or that other guy) back in the mid-90s that we’d run out of Internet addresses before we ran out of oil, what kind of odds do you think you would have gotten?
In any event, I thank you for the hubris.
March 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM #168884TheBreezeParticipantWho would think there are an infinite supply of 32 bit integers?
Allow me to re-phrase: Who woulda’ thunk that we couldn’t just add more internet addresses as needed? I mean, certainly Internet addresses are easier to create than say something like oil right? All you do is add a few more bits, right? If you’d have bet the inventor of the Internet (Al Gore or that other guy) back in the mid-90s that we’d run out of Internet addresses before we ran out of oil, what kind of odds do you think you would have gotten?
In any event, I thank you for the hubris.
March 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM #168448TheBreezeParticipantWho would think there are an infinite supply of 32 bit integers?
Allow me to re-phrase: Who woulda’ thunk that we couldn’t just add more internet addresses as needed? I mean, certainly Internet addresses are easier to create than say something like oil right? All you do is add a few more bits, right? If you’d have bet the inventor of the Internet (Al Gore or that other guy) back in the mid-90s that we’d run out of Internet addresses before we ran out of oil, what kind of odds do you think you would have gotten?
In any event, I thank you for the hubris.
March 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM #168780TheBreezeParticipantWho would think there are an infinite supply of 32 bit integers?
Allow me to re-phrase: Who woulda’ thunk that we couldn’t just add more internet addresses as needed? I mean, certainly Internet addresses are easier to create than say something like oil right? All you do is add a few more bits, right? If you’d have bet the inventor of the Internet (Al Gore or that other guy) back in the mid-90s that we’d run out of Internet addresses before we ran out of oil, what kind of odds do you think you would have gotten?
In any event, I thank you for the hubris.
March 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM #168779TheBreezeParticipantWho would think there are an infinite supply of 32 bit integers?
Allow me to re-phrase: Who woulda’ thunk that we couldn’t just add more internet addresses as needed? I mean, certainly Internet addresses are easier to create than say something like oil right? All you do is add a few more bits, right? If you’d have bet the inventor of the Internet (Al Gore or that other guy) back in the mid-90s that we’d run out of Internet addresses before we ran out of oil, what kind of odds do you think you would have gotten?
In any event, I thank you for the hubris.
March 13, 2008 at 9:21 AM #168916patientlywaitingParticipantSo far I agree with capeman. The Fed can’t bailout the banks on its own. It will take an act of Congress for that. They’ll have to create RTC#2. We’re not there yet. We may get there later.
Perhaps a re-nationalization of Fannie Mae. Shareholders will be slaughtered.
March 13, 2008 at 9:21 AM #168924patientlywaitingParticipantSo far I agree with capeman. The Fed can’t bailout the banks on its own. It will take an act of Congress for that. They’ll have to create RTC#2. We’re not there yet. We may get there later.
Perhaps a re-nationalization of Fannie Mae. Shareholders will be slaughtered.
March 13, 2008 at 9:21 AM #168945patientlywaitingParticipantSo far I agree with capeman. The Fed can’t bailout the banks on its own. It will take an act of Congress for that. They’ll have to create RTC#2. We’re not there yet. We may get there later.
Perhaps a re-nationalization of Fannie Mae. Shareholders will be slaughtered.
March 13, 2008 at 9:21 AM #169021patientlywaitingParticipantSo far I agree with capeman. The Fed can’t bailout the banks on its own. It will take an act of Congress for that. They’ll have to create RTC#2. We’re not there yet. We may get there later.
Perhaps a re-nationalization of Fannie Mae. Shareholders will be slaughtered.
March 13, 2008 at 9:21 AM #168587patientlywaitingParticipantSo far I agree with capeman. The Fed can’t bailout the banks on its own. It will take an act of Congress for that. They’ll have to create RTC#2. We’re not there yet. We may get there later.
Perhaps a re-nationalization of Fannie Mae. Shareholders will be slaughtered.
March 13, 2008 at 1:09 PM #168781kev374ParticipantThis is why we DO NOT need democrats in the white house. They will have a huge bailout and tax those of us who have worked hard to earn the money that we richly deserve. Tax the responsible and hand it to the bums who not only chose to live beyond their means but then complain that they are not continuing to get the free ride that they have recieved in the past 2-3 yrs of their 0 down negAm mortgages!
March 13, 2008 at 1:09 PM #169114kev374ParticipantThis is why we DO NOT need democrats in the white house. They will have a huge bailout and tax those of us who have worked hard to earn the money that we richly deserve. Tax the responsible and hand it to the bums who not only chose to live beyond their means but then complain that they are not continuing to get the free ride that they have recieved in the past 2-3 yrs of their 0 down negAm mortgages!
March 13, 2008 at 1:09 PM #169116kev374ParticipantThis is why we DO NOT need democrats in the white house. They will have a huge bailout and tax those of us who have worked hard to earn the money that we richly deserve. Tax the responsible and hand it to the bums who not only chose to live beyond their means but then complain that they are not continuing to get the free ride that they have recieved in the past 2-3 yrs of their 0 down negAm mortgages!
March 13, 2008 at 1:09 PM #169140kev374ParticipantThis is why we DO NOT need democrats in the white house. They will have a huge bailout and tax those of us who have worked hard to earn the money that we richly deserve. Tax the responsible and hand it to the bums who not only chose to live beyond their means but then complain that they are not continuing to get the free ride that they have recieved in the past 2-3 yrs of their 0 down negAm mortgages!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.