Article: Obama Says U.S. Long-Term Debt Load ‘Unsustainable’

[NotCranky]

Resources O.K., I get the central asian situation a little better now…

This is the last sentence from the abstract pasted below: “and the region is likely to diminish OPEC’s influence of the global oil market over the long term.”

Central Asia: A major emerging energy player in the 21st century

James P. Dorian

International Energy Economist, 6201 Benalder Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20816, USA

Abstract
Energy is the most abundant and valuable natural resource of Central Asia and northwest China1 and includes oil, gas, coal, electricity, and renewables. Kazakhstan has large reserves of oil and coal. Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan have significant reserves of gas. Kyrgyzstan produces significant amounts of hydroelectric power. Xinjiang, China has significant coal resources and an uncertain, although generally promising, potential for oil in the Tarim basin. These energy reserves form the basis for future economic growth and development in the region, and energy exports are beginning to generate important foreign exchange revenues. Although Central Asia enjoys vast energy development potential, there are obstacles to exploiting these resources, including limited infrastructure for transporting energy—notably oil and gas pipelines and electric transmission lines—in the region, political turmoil, payment difficulties, and inadequate energy policies. Despite these challenges, however, with appropriate government planning Central Asia is poised to become a significant world supplier of energy, especially in the oil and gas sectors, and the region is likely to diminish OPEC’s influence of the global oil market over the long term.

[scaredyclassic]

so, uh, how can i make a buck off this?

[scaredyclassic]

so, uh, how can i make a buck off this?

[scaredyclassic]

so, uh, how can i make a buck off this?

[scaredyclassic]

so, uh, how can i make a buck off this?

[scaredyclassic]

so, uh, how can i make a buck off this?

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=Eugene]Navy is useless without strong aviation support. Chinese air force is relatively outdated compared to Americans. They have lots of aircraft (mostly Russian-bought), but they lack stealth capabilities.

Also, aviation is only good if you can get it to where the action is. Fighter jets can’t go much further than 1000 miles from the base. Which means (1) military bases on foreign soil and/or (2) aircraft carriers. US Navy has 11 aircraft carriers (more than all other countries in the world combined), they carry around 300 F/A-18’s which will be gradually replaced with F-35’s. Chinese have no aircraft carriers, though they are expected to launch two or three in the next ten years. Without aircraft carriers, their sphere of influence is limited to 1000 miles from their soil and any bases they manage to establish. They can’t even do much in Iran because it’s too far. They’d have to work with Russians (fighters launched from Russian bases in Caucasus could, in principle, bomb Tehran and make it back.)
[/quote]

Eugene: No disagreement here. No one projects power like the US. However, China is coming on fast and they are proving quite adept at adapting MiG designs for homegrown manufacturer (e.g. the J6 and J11 fighters).

The “new” MiG 35 Fulcrum-F (which is a MiG 29 Fulcrum derivative) is actually a pretty good fighter plane and it incorporates look down AESA radar and improved avionics, including OLS (optical locator system). Russia has already approached China regarding selling them the Fulcrum-F design for licensed manufacture (as reported by Jane’s Defence).

I would imagine the new Sino-Russian defense lash up postulates the establishment of air bases in Central Asia. Same undoubtedly goes for the Chinese presence in Africa.

Rus: Read “The Great Game” by Peter Hopkirk. It’s a very enlightening book and it shows how little has changed over the last 150+ years.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=Eugene]Navy is useless without strong aviation support. Chinese air force is relatively outdated compared to Americans. They have lots of aircraft (mostly Russian-bought), but they lack stealth capabilities.

Also, aviation is only good if you can get it to where the action is. Fighter jets can’t go much further than 1000 miles from the base. Which means (1) military bases on foreign soil and/or (2) aircraft carriers. US Navy has 11 aircraft carriers (more than all other countries in the world combined), they carry around 300 F/A-18’s which will be gradually replaced with F-35’s. Chinese have no aircraft carriers, though they are expected to launch two or three in the next ten years. Without aircraft carriers, their sphere of influence is limited to 1000 miles from their soil and any bases they manage to establish. They can’t even do much in Iran because it’s too far. They’d have to work with Russians (fighters launched from Russian bases in Caucasus could, in principle, bomb Tehran and make it back.)
[/quote]

Eugene: No disagreement here. No one projects power like the US. However, China is coming on fast and they are proving quite adept at adapting MiG designs for homegrown manufacturer (e.g. the J6 and J11 fighters).

The “new” MiG 35 Fulcrum-F (which is a MiG 29 Fulcrum derivative) is actually a pretty good fighter plane and it incorporates look down AESA radar and improved avionics, including OLS (optical locator system). Russia has already approached China regarding selling them the Fulcrum-F design for licensed manufacture (as reported by Jane’s Defence).

I would imagine the new Sino-Russian defense lash up postulates the establishment of air bases in Central Asia. Same undoubtedly goes for the Chinese presence in Africa.

Rus: Read “The Great Game” by Peter Hopkirk. It’s a very enlightening book and it shows how little has changed over the last 150+ years.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=Eugene]Navy is useless without strong aviation support. Chinese air force is relatively outdated compared to Americans. They have lots of aircraft (mostly Russian-bought), but they lack stealth capabilities.

Also, aviation is only good if you can get it to where the action is. Fighter jets can’t go much further than 1000 miles from the base. Which means (1) military bases on foreign soil and/or (2) aircraft carriers. US Navy has 11 aircraft carriers (more than all other countries in the world combined), they carry around 300 F/A-18’s which will be gradually replaced with F-35’s. Chinese have no aircraft carriers, though they are expected to launch two or three in the next ten years. Without aircraft carriers, their sphere of influence is limited to 1000 miles from their soil and any bases they manage to establish. They can’t even do much in Iran because it’s too far. They’d have to work with Russians (fighters launched from Russian bases in Caucasus could, in principle, bomb Tehran and make it back.)
[/quote]

Eugene: No disagreement here. No one projects power like the US. However, China is coming on fast and they are proving quite adept at adapting MiG designs for homegrown manufacturer (e.g. the J6 and J11 fighters).

The “new” MiG 35 Fulcrum-F (which is a MiG 29 Fulcrum derivative) is actually a pretty good fighter plane and it incorporates look down AESA radar and improved avionics, including OLS (optical locator system). Russia has already approached China regarding selling them the Fulcrum-F design for licensed manufacture (as reported by Jane’s Defence).

I would imagine the new Sino-Russian defense lash up postulates the establishment of air bases in Central Asia. Same undoubtedly goes for the Chinese presence in Africa.

Rus: Read “The Great Game” by Peter Hopkirk. It’s a very enlightening book and it shows how little has changed over the last 150+ years.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=Eugene]Navy is useless without strong aviation support. Chinese air force is relatively outdated compared to Americans. They have lots of aircraft (mostly Russian-bought), but they lack stealth capabilities.

Also, aviation is only good if you can get it to where the action is. Fighter jets can’t go much further than 1000 miles from the base. Which means (1) military bases on foreign soil and/or (2) aircraft carriers. US Navy has 11 aircraft carriers (more than all other countries in the world combined), they carry around 300 F/A-18’s which will be gradually replaced with F-35’s. Chinese have no aircraft carriers, though they are expected to launch two or three in the next ten years. Without aircraft carriers, their sphere of influence is limited to 1000 miles from their soil and any bases they manage to establish. They can’t even do much in Iran because it’s too far. They’d have to work with Russians (fighters launched from Russian bases in Caucasus could, in principle, bomb Tehran and make it back.)
[/quote]

Eugene: No disagreement here. No one projects power like the US. However, China is coming on fast and they are proving quite adept at adapting MiG designs for homegrown manufacturer (e.g. the J6 and J11 fighters).

The “new” MiG 35 Fulcrum-F (which is a MiG 29 Fulcrum derivative) is actually a pretty good fighter plane and it incorporates look down AESA radar and improved avionics, including OLS (optical locator system). Russia has already approached China regarding selling them the Fulcrum-F design for licensed manufacture (as reported by Jane’s Defence).

I would imagine the new Sino-Russian defense lash up postulates the establishment of air bases in Central Asia. Same undoubtedly goes for the Chinese presence in Africa.

Rus: Read “The Great Game” by Peter Hopkirk. It’s a very enlightening book and it shows how little has changed over the last 150+ years.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=Eugene]Navy is useless without strong aviation support. Chinese air force is relatively outdated compared to Americans. They have lots of aircraft (mostly Russian-bought), but they lack stealth capabilities.

Also, aviation is only good if you can get it to where the action is. Fighter jets can’t go much further than 1000 miles from the base. Which means (1) military bases on foreign soil and/or (2) aircraft carriers. US Navy has 11 aircraft carriers (more than all other countries in the world combined), they carry around 300 F/A-18’s which will be gradually replaced with F-35’s. Chinese have no aircraft carriers, though they are expected to launch two or three in the next ten years. Without aircraft carriers, their sphere of influence is limited to 1000 miles from their soil and any bases they manage to establish. They can’t even do much in Iran because it’s too far. They’d have to work with Russians (fighters launched from Russian bases in Caucasus could, in principle, bomb Tehran and make it back.)
[/quote]

Eugene: No disagreement here. No one projects power like the US. However, China is coming on fast and they are proving quite adept at adapting MiG designs for homegrown manufacturer (e.g. the J6 and J11 fighters).

The “new” MiG 35 Fulcrum-F (which is a MiG 29 Fulcrum derivative) is actually a pretty good fighter plane and it incorporates look down AESA radar and improved avionics, including OLS (optical locator system). Russia has already approached China regarding selling them the Fulcrum-F design for licensed manufacture (as reported by Jane’s Defence).

I would imagine the new Sino-Russian defense lash up postulates the establishment of air bases in Central Asia. Same undoubtedly goes for the Chinese presence in Africa.

Rus: Read “The Great Game” by Peter Hopkirk. It’s a very enlightening book and it shows how little has changed over the last 150+ years.

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=scaredycat]so, uh, how can i make a buck off this?[/quote]

Buy stock in Mikoyan-Gurevich (MiG) or CNOOC (China National Offshore Oil Corporation).

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=scaredycat]so, uh, how can i make a buck off this?[/quote]

Buy stock in Mikoyan-Gurevich (MiG) or CNOOC (China National Offshore Oil Corporation).

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=scaredycat]so, uh, how can i make a buck off this?[/quote]

Buy stock in Mikoyan-Gurevich (MiG) or CNOOC (China National Offshore Oil Corporation).

[Allan from Fallbrook]

[quote=scaredycat]so, uh, how can i make a buck off this?[/quote]

Buy stock in Mikoyan-Gurevich (MiG) or CNOOC (China National Offshore Oil Corporation).

[Author]

Posts