Apparently SD is UNDERvalued right now, by alot

[paranoid]

4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.

[PadreBrian]

I feel price vs rent is just about right. The high-end stuff needs to fall a bit more, but for the most part, prices in the SD area should fall to pre-bubble prices.

[PadreBrian]

I feel price vs rent is just about right. The high-end stuff needs to fall a bit more, but for the most part, prices in the SD area should fall to pre-bubble prices.

[PadreBrian]

I feel price vs rent is just about right. The high-end stuff needs to fall a bit more, but for the most part, prices in the SD area should fall to pre-bubble prices.

[PadreBrian]

I feel price vs rent is just about right. The high-end stuff needs to fall a bit more, but for the most part, prices in the SD area should fall to pre-bubble prices.

[PadreBrian]

I feel price vs rent is just about right. The high-end stuff needs to fall a bit more, but for the most part, prices in the SD area should fall to pre-bubble prices.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

[quote=paranoid]4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.[/quote]

Wrong.

The first sentence in the article indicates that it was overpriced by about 40% according to their method.

Also, the chart indicates that their expected value for the price was just above 350K in 2005, while the median was just above 500K.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

[quote=paranoid]4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.[/quote]

Wrong.

The first sentence in the article indicates that it was overpriced by about 40% according to their method.

Also, the chart indicates that their expected value for the price was just above 350K in 2005, while the median was just above 500K.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

[quote=paranoid]4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.[/quote]

Wrong.

The first sentence in the article indicates that it was overpriced by about 40% according to their method.

Also, the chart indicates that their expected value for the price was just above 350K in 2005, while the median was just above 500K.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

[quote=paranoid]4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.[/quote]

Wrong.

The first sentence in the article indicates that it was overpriced by about 40% according to their method.

Also, the chart indicates that their expected value for the price was just above 350K in 2005, while the median was just above 500K.

[(former)FormerSanDiegan]

[quote=paranoid]4 years ago, their methodology would predict that housing price would never fall.[/quote]

Wrong.

The first sentence in the article indicates that it was overpriced by about 40% according to their method.

Also, the chart indicates that their expected value for the price was just above 350K in 2005, while the median was just above 500K.

[Bob]

As others have pointed out, this article is garbage and not worth responding to.

[Bob]

As others have pointed out, this article is garbage and not worth responding to.

[Bob]

As others have pointed out, this article is garbage and not worth responding to.

[Bob]

As others have pointed out, this article is garbage and not worth responding to.

[Author]

Posts