- This topic has 230 replies, 30 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 12 months ago by gandalf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 23, 2009 at 10:49 PM #486793November 23, 2009 at 11:20 PM #485954CA renterParticipant
I agree that Powayseller was right. She doesn’t need to say she was wrong, because she was right. The housing market saw 40%+ declines in San Diego County, didn’t it? And we did see a severe stock market correction.
Nobody can be right on timing 100% of the time, but she was absolutely right on the direction of the markets.
There are many of us who do daily battle with the concepts of inflation/deflation and which will win over time. I’m a long-time deflationist, but hedged against a dollar decline a few years ago because I was/am worried about a currency crisis (now out of those positions).
November 23, 2009 at 11:20 PM #486123CA renterParticipantI agree that Powayseller was right. She doesn’t need to say she was wrong, because she was right. The housing market saw 40%+ declines in San Diego County, didn’t it? And we did see a severe stock market correction.
Nobody can be right on timing 100% of the time, but she was absolutely right on the direction of the markets.
There are many of us who do daily battle with the concepts of inflation/deflation and which will win over time. I’m a long-time deflationist, but hedged against a dollar decline a few years ago because I was/am worried about a currency crisis (now out of those positions).
November 23, 2009 at 11:20 PM #486496CA renterParticipantI agree that Powayseller was right. She doesn’t need to say she was wrong, because she was right. The housing market saw 40%+ declines in San Diego County, didn’t it? And we did see a severe stock market correction.
Nobody can be right on timing 100% of the time, but she was absolutely right on the direction of the markets.
There are many of us who do daily battle with the concepts of inflation/deflation and which will win over time. I’m a long-time deflationist, but hedged against a dollar decline a few years ago because I was/am worried about a currency crisis (now out of those positions).
November 23, 2009 at 11:20 PM #486583CA renterParticipantI agree that Powayseller was right. She doesn’t need to say she was wrong, because she was right. The housing market saw 40%+ declines in San Diego County, didn’t it? And we did see a severe stock market correction.
Nobody can be right on timing 100% of the time, but she was absolutely right on the direction of the markets.
There are many of us who do daily battle with the concepts of inflation/deflation and which will win over time. I’m a long-time deflationist, but hedged against a dollar decline a few years ago because I was/am worried about a currency crisis (now out of those positions).
November 23, 2009 at 11:20 PM #486813CA renterParticipantI agree that Powayseller was right. She doesn’t need to say she was wrong, because she was right. The housing market saw 40%+ declines in San Diego County, didn’t it? And we did see a severe stock market correction.
Nobody can be right on timing 100% of the time, but she was absolutely right on the direction of the markets.
There are many of us who do daily battle with the concepts of inflation/deflation and which will win over time. I’m a long-time deflationist, but hedged against a dollar decline a few years ago because I was/am worried about a currency crisis (now out of those positions).
November 23, 2009 at 11:54 PM #485974anParticipant[quote=CA renter]I agree that Powayseller was right. She doesn’t need to say she was wrong, because she was right. The housing market saw 40%+ declines in San Diego County, didn’t it? And we did see a severe stock market correction.
Nobody can be right on timing 100% of the time, but she was absolutely right on the direction of the markets.
There are many of us who do daily battle with the concepts of inflation/deflation and which will win over time. I’m a long-time deflationist, but hedged against a dollar decline a few years ago because I was/am worried about a currency crisis (now out of those positions).[/quote]
I thought powayseller was all about 50+% decline, not 40+%? Timing and magnitude is key, not direction. Almost everyone on here were predicting a decline in 2006. Like sdr said, I think she was predicting 50+% decline in nicer areas, not Temecula and Chula Vista. I’m still waiting for 50% decline in MM SFR, any chance that’ll happen?powayseller was predicting S&P500 @600 in 2007. If that’s your definition of being correct, then I can predict SD housing market will double next year and NASDAQ will hit 5000 next year too. I might be off a few years to a few decade, but I’ll be right eventually. Broken clock is right 2 times a day.
November 23, 2009 at 11:54 PM #486142anParticipant[quote=CA renter]I agree that Powayseller was right. She doesn’t need to say she was wrong, because she was right. The housing market saw 40%+ declines in San Diego County, didn’t it? And we did see a severe stock market correction.
Nobody can be right on timing 100% of the time, but she was absolutely right on the direction of the markets.
There are many of us who do daily battle with the concepts of inflation/deflation and which will win over time. I’m a long-time deflationist, but hedged against a dollar decline a few years ago because I was/am worried about a currency crisis (now out of those positions).[/quote]
I thought powayseller was all about 50+% decline, not 40+%? Timing and magnitude is key, not direction. Almost everyone on here were predicting a decline in 2006. Like sdr said, I think she was predicting 50+% decline in nicer areas, not Temecula and Chula Vista. I’m still waiting for 50% decline in MM SFR, any chance that’ll happen?powayseller was predicting S&P500 @600 in 2007. If that’s your definition of being correct, then I can predict SD housing market will double next year and NASDAQ will hit 5000 next year too. I might be off a few years to a few decade, but I’ll be right eventually. Broken clock is right 2 times a day.
November 23, 2009 at 11:54 PM #486515anParticipant[quote=CA renter]I agree that Powayseller was right. She doesn’t need to say she was wrong, because she was right. The housing market saw 40%+ declines in San Diego County, didn’t it? And we did see a severe stock market correction.
Nobody can be right on timing 100% of the time, but she was absolutely right on the direction of the markets.
There are many of us who do daily battle with the concepts of inflation/deflation and which will win over time. I’m a long-time deflationist, but hedged against a dollar decline a few years ago because I was/am worried about a currency crisis (now out of those positions).[/quote]
I thought powayseller was all about 50+% decline, not 40+%? Timing and magnitude is key, not direction. Almost everyone on here were predicting a decline in 2006. Like sdr said, I think she was predicting 50+% decline in nicer areas, not Temecula and Chula Vista. I’m still waiting for 50% decline in MM SFR, any chance that’ll happen?powayseller was predicting S&P500 @600 in 2007. If that’s your definition of being correct, then I can predict SD housing market will double next year and NASDAQ will hit 5000 next year too. I might be off a few years to a few decade, but I’ll be right eventually. Broken clock is right 2 times a day.
November 23, 2009 at 11:54 PM #486603anParticipant[quote=CA renter]I agree that Powayseller was right. She doesn’t need to say she was wrong, because she was right. The housing market saw 40%+ declines in San Diego County, didn’t it? And we did see a severe stock market correction.
Nobody can be right on timing 100% of the time, but she was absolutely right on the direction of the markets.
There are many of us who do daily battle with the concepts of inflation/deflation and which will win over time. I’m a long-time deflationist, but hedged against a dollar decline a few years ago because I was/am worried about a currency crisis (now out of those positions).[/quote]
I thought powayseller was all about 50+% decline, not 40+%? Timing and magnitude is key, not direction. Almost everyone on here were predicting a decline in 2006. Like sdr said, I think she was predicting 50+% decline in nicer areas, not Temecula and Chula Vista. I’m still waiting for 50% decline in MM SFR, any chance that’ll happen?powayseller was predicting S&P500 @600 in 2007. If that’s your definition of being correct, then I can predict SD housing market will double next year and NASDAQ will hit 5000 next year too. I might be off a few years to a few decade, but I’ll be right eventually. Broken clock is right 2 times a day.
November 23, 2009 at 11:54 PM #486833anParticipant[quote=CA renter]I agree that Powayseller was right. She doesn’t need to say she was wrong, because she was right. The housing market saw 40%+ declines in San Diego County, didn’t it? And we did see a severe stock market correction.
Nobody can be right on timing 100% of the time, but she was absolutely right on the direction of the markets.
There are many of us who do daily battle with the concepts of inflation/deflation and which will win over time. I’m a long-time deflationist, but hedged against a dollar decline a few years ago because I was/am worried about a currency crisis (now out of those positions).[/quote]
I thought powayseller was all about 50+% decline, not 40+%? Timing and magnitude is key, not direction. Almost everyone on here were predicting a decline in 2006. Like sdr said, I think she was predicting 50+% decline in nicer areas, not Temecula and Chula Vista. I’m still waiting for 50% decline in MM SFR, any chance that’ll happen?powayseller was predicting S&P500 @600 in 2007. If that’s your definition of being correct, then I can predict SD housing market will double next year and NASDAQ will hit 5000 next year too. I might be off a few years to a few decade, but I’ll be right eventually. Broken clock is right 2 times a day.
November 24, 2009 at 12:21 AM #485984CA renterParticipantWell, this bubble still isn’t over. I know everyone is out celebrating the “end of the recession,” but I think we still have a long way to go.
I don’t remember the exact details, but PS was predicting 40%+ (yes, probably 50%) at a time when most people thought we’d see no more than a 15% correction. I’d say she was more correct than the milder bears.
November 24, 2009 at 12:21 AM #486152CA renterParticipantWell, this bubble still isn’t over. I know everyone is out celebrating the “end of the recession,” but I think we still have a long way to go.
I don’t remember the exact details, but PS was predicting 40%+ (yes, probably 50%) at a time when most people thought we’d see no more than a 15% correction. I’d say she was more correct than the milder bears.
November 24, 2009 at 12:21 AM #486525CA renterParticipantWell, this bubble still isn’t over. I know everyone is out celebrating the “end of the recession,” but I think we still have a long way to go.
I don’t remember the exact details, but PS was predicting 40%+ (yes, probably 50%) at a time when most people thought we’d see no more than a 15% correction. I’d say she was more correct than the milder bears.
November 24, 2009 at 12:21 AM #486613CA renterParticipantWell, this bubble still isn’t over. I know everyone is out celebrating the “end of the recession,” but I think we still have a long way to go.
I don’t remember the exact details, but PS was predicting 40%+ (yes, probably 50%) at a time when most people thought we’d see no more than a 15% correction. I’d say she was more correct than the milder bears.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.