- This topic has 1,201 replies, 38 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by
HarryBosch.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM #190598April 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM #190646
Anonymous
GuestNostradamus: While it does happen in very rare instances, most men do not cheat with or leave their wives for older, less attractive, more intelligent women.
That’s probably true because of what drives a man in general.
Witness what Eliot Spitzer cheated with. His wife is the essense of an accomplished, intelligent, beautiful (certainly very attractive for her age) woman, but she has to worry about a threat not only from younger, more attractive women — but the women are literally whores as well! Guess the wanna-be rapper/models are more intelligent and accomplished than his wife??
Eliot Spitzer was/is a slime. He wanted SEX. He was tired of predictable, boring, sex and he wanted something different. He was such a prisoner to his carnal lusts, he didn’t use condoms with these women thus exposing his wife to every STD known to man-kind including AIDS.
There are still decent men on this earth. Spitzer is not one of them.
Ms. Spitzer was/is a stay-at-home wife I believe. If there is a divorcce, I suspect she’ll want alimony and half the marital assets as well. I guess she’s a victim as well, right Nostradamus?
April 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM #190537GuestDarn it, ive been misquoted, but at least been credited with wisdom.
Yeah, if it isnt a program, a child, a wind up or a double poster….Marion sure is a piece of work no question…just another way to pass the time.
Contempt of court in civil cases is very rarely subject to jail time, especially for indirect contempt. Donating a one time large sum of money to a childrens fund is a great way to win political favor with a judge/jury if the charge ever did make it through the due process.
Ill take my chances and if the judge wants to send me to jail, that is the system isnt it.
Jasper
April 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM #190560GuestDarn it, ive been misquoted, but at least been credited with wisdom.
Yeah, if it isnt a program, a child, a wind up or a double poster….Marion sure is a piece of work no question…just another way to pass the time.
Contempt of court in civil cases is very rarely subject to jail time, especially for indirect contempt. Donating a one time large sum of money to a childrens fund is a great way to win political favor with a judge/jury if the charge ever did make it through the due process.
Ill take my chances and if the judge wants to send me to jail, that is the system isnt it.
Jasper
April 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM #190589GuestDarn it, ive been misquoted, but at least been credited with wisdom.
Yeah, if it isnt a program, a child, a wind up or a double poster….Marion sure is a piece of work no question…just another way to pass the time.
Contempt of court in civil cases is very rarely subject to jail time, especially for indirect contempt. Donating a one time large sum of money to a childrens fund is a great way to win political favor with a judge/jury if the charge ever did make it through the due process.
Ill take my chances and if the judge wants to send me to jail, that is the system isnt it.
Jasper
April 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM #190603GuestDarn it, ive been misquoted, but at least been credited with wisdom.
Yeah, if it isnt a program, a child, a wind up or a double poster….Marion sure is a piece of work no question…just another way to pass the time.
Contempt of court in civil cases is very rarely subject to jail time, especially for indirect contempt. Donating a one time large sum of money to a childrens fund is a great way to win political favor with a judge/jury if the charge ever did make it through the due process.
Ill take my chances and if the judge wants to send me to jail, that is the system isnt it.
Jasper
April 19, 2008 at 5:31 PM #190651GuestDarn it, ive been misquoted, but at least been credited with wisdom.
Yeah, if it isnt a program, a child, a wind up or a double poster….Marion sure is a piece of work no question…just another way to pass the time.
Contempt of court in civil cases is very rarely subject to jail time, especially for indirect contempt. Donating a one time large sum of money to a childrens fund is a great way to win political favor with a judge/jury if the charge ever did make it through the due process.
Ill take my chances and if the judge wants to send me to jail, that is the system isnt it.
Jasper
April 19, 2008 at 5:42 PM #190542
CoronitaParticipantOk page 7. My head is spinning. I give up.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
April 19, 2008 at 5:42 PM #190565CoronitaParticipantOk page 7. My head is spinning. I give up.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
April 19, 2008 at 5:42 PM #190595CoronitaParticipantOk page 7. My head is spinning. I give up.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
April 19, 2008 at 5:42 PM #190608CoronitaParticipantOk page 7. My head is spinning. I give up.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
April 19, 2008 at 5:42 PM #190656CoronitaParticipantOk page 7. My head is spinning. I give up.
[img_assist|nid=5962|title=selfportrait|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=100|height=80]
—– Sour grapes for everyone!
April 19, 2008 at 5:53 PM #190547nostradamus
ParticipantHi CA Renter,
I like your posts and they show some real thought. The front-loaded/back-loaded trading of life’s best assets was very well put.
About Spitzer, I don’t know the whole story but the fact that he betrayed an accomplished woman for a call-girl smacks of sexual frustration to me. This is pure speculation, but his wife’s “Southern Babtist” upbringing might indicate a certain amount of conservativeness in life. Perhaps he was so worried about his public image or was so distrustful of his wife that he wouldn’t indulge in his sexual desires with her, so sought them elsewhere (and didn’t plan on getting caught). It might be hard to portray a decent, upright persona to the public while still being a man with all kinds of kinky desires he just couldn’t indulge with the churchy missus. It does look like he shouldn’t have gotten married but priorities in life are a moving target.
As I said this is all speculation and nobody but the Spitzers know the whole story. Some mainstream media monkeys or boob-tube-educated idiots might rush to call him slime, but they of course want to see it their way. There are two sides to every story, not just “the man is always wrong”. Give me the whole, inside story from the day Spitzer met his wife to the day they got divorced, then we can say who is wrong.
I have heard it hinted here or flat-out stated that some women believe it is acceptable to hold out on sex in order to get something they want from a man. If this is acceptable, then so too should the act of men seeking sex elsewhere. I think if society cares so much about sex scandals they should only vote for asexual leaders.
IMO today’s approach to sex and marriage and family are an abomination of nature. I guess it was a trade-off when we got those higher reasoning brains… they came with all kinds of psychoses. For the record, Spitzer did not leave his wife. He seems to have wanted the best of both worlds.
April 19, 2008 at 5:53 PM #190570ParticipantHi CA Renter,
I like your posts and they show some real thought. The front-loaded/back-loaded trading of life’s best assets was very well put.
About Spitzer, I don’t know the whole story but the fact that he betrayed an accomplished woman for a call-girl smacks of sexual frustration to me. This is pure speculation, but his wife’s “Southern Babtist” upbringing might indicate a certain amount of conservativeness in life. Perhaps he was so worried about his public image or was so distrustful of his wife that he wouldn’t indulge in his sexual desires with her, so sought them elsewhere (and didn’t plan on getting caught). It might be hard to portray a decent, upright persona to the public while still being a man with all kinds of kinky desires he just couldn’t indulge with the churchy missus. It does look like he shouldn’t have gotten married but priorities in life are a moving target.
As I said this is all speculation and nobody but the Spitzers know the whole story. Some mainstream media monkeys or boob-tube-educated idiots might rush to call him slime, but they of course want to see it their way. There are two sides to every story, not just “the man is always wrong”. Give me the whole, inside story from the day Spitzer met his wife to the day they got divorced, then we can say who is wrong.
I have heard it hinted here or flat-out stated that some women believe it is acceptable to hold out on sex in order to get something they want from a man. If this is acceptable, then so too should the act of men seeking sex elsewhere. I think if society cares so much about sex scandals they should only vote for asexual leaders.
IMO today’s approach to sex and marriage and family are an abomination of nature. I guess it was a trade-off when we got those higher reasoning brains… they came with all kinds of psychoses. For the record, Spitzer did not leave his wife. He seems to have wanted the best of both worlds.
April 19, 2008 at 5:53 PM #190599ParticipantHi CA Renter,
I like your posts and they show some real thought. The front-loaded/back-loaded trading of life’s best assets was very well put.
About Spitzer, I don’t know the whole story but the fact that he betrayed an accomplished woman for a call-girl smacks of sexual frustration to me. This is pure speculation, but his wife’s “Southern Babtist” upbringing might indicate a certain amount of conservativeness in life. Perhaps he was so worried about his public image or was so distrustful of his wife that he wouldn’t indulge in his sexual desires with her, so sought them elsewhere (and didn’t plan on getting caught). It might be hard to portray a decent, upright persona to the public while still being a man with all kinds of kinky desires he just couldn’t indulge with the churchy missus. It does look like he shouldn’t have gotten married but priorities in life are a moving target.
As I said this is all speculation and nobody but the Spitzers know the whole story. Some mainstream media monkeys or boob-tube-educated idiots might rush to call him slime, but they of course want to see it their way. There are two sides to every story, not just “the man is always wrong”. Give me the whole, inside story from the day Spitzer met his wife to the day they got divorced, then we can say who is wrong.
I have heard it hinted here or flat-out stated that some women believe it is acceptable to hold out on sex in order to get something they want from a man. If this is acceptable, then so too should the act of men seeking sex elsewhere. I think if society cares so much about sex scandals they should only vote for asexual leaders.
IMO today’s approach to sex and marriage and family are an abomination of nature. I guess it was a trade-off when we got those higher reasoning brains… they came with all kinds of psychoses. For the record, Spitzer did not leave his wife. He seems to have wanted the best of both worlds.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.