Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Anybody else shocked?
- This topic has 75 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
Nor-LA-SD-guy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 20, 2010 at 1:34 AM #516186February 20, 2010 at 8:19 AM #515566
EconProf
ParticipantThe mayor is yet another liberal who has been mugged by reality. We’ve seen more and more lately.
February 20, 2010 at 8:19 AM #516476EconProf
ParticipantThe mayor is yet another liberal who has been mugged by reality. We’ve seen more and more lately.
February 20, 2010 at 8:19 AM #515709EconProf
ParticipantThe mayor is yet another liberal who has been mugged by reality. We’ve seen more and more lately.
February 20, 2010 at 8:19 AM #516225EconProf
ParticipantThe mayor is yet another liberal who has been mugged by reality. We’ve seen more and more lately.
February 20, 2010 at 8:19 AM #516134EconProf
ParticipantThe mayor is yet another liberal who has been mugged by reality. We’ve seen more and more lately.
February 20, 2010 at 1:45 PM #516356paramount
ParticipantTG: Are you kidding? Up to 80% of the current state deficit is directly or indirectly attributed to gov’t worker entitlements.
Yes, we do have a problem with welfare, but isn’t gov’t employment in no small way welfare in itself?
I really wish the term “Civil Servant” would be phased out, because we all know who the real servants are…
February 20, 2010 at 1:45 PM #516265paramount
ParticipantTG: Are you kidding? Up to 80% of the current state deficit is directly or indirectly attributed to gov’t worker entitlements.
Yes, we do have a problem with welfare, but isn’t gov’t employment in no small way welfare in itself?
I really wish the term “Civil Servant” would be phased out, because we all know who the real servants are…
February 20, 2010 at 1:45 PM #515697paramount
ParticipantTG: Are you kidding? Up to 80% of the current state deficit is directly or indirectly attributed to gov’t worker entitlements.
Yes, we do have a problem with welfare, but isn’t gov’t employment in no small way welfare in itself?
I really wish the term “Civil Servant” would be phased out, because we all know who the real servants are…
February 20, 2010 at 1:45 PM #516609paramount
ParticipantTG: Are you kidding? Up to 80% of the current state deficit is directly or indirectly attributed to gov’t worker entitlements.
Yes, we do have a problem with welfare, but isn’t gov’t employment in no small way welfare in itself?
I really wish the term “Civil Servant” would be phased out, because we all know who the real servants are…
February 20, 2010 at 1:45 PM #515841paramount
ParticipantTG: Are you kidding? Up to 80% of the current state deficit is directly or indirectly attributed to gov’t worker entitlements.
Yes, we do have a problem with welfare, but isn’t gov’t employment in no small way welfare in itself?
I really wish the term “Civil Servant” would be phased out, because we all know who the real servants are…
February 20, 2010 at 2:20 PM #516275moneymaker
ParticipantI believe Arnold tried to get money from the Feds for allowing the illegals into CA in the first place,Feds say no way jose. The Feds are in denial and yet I believe they are matching funds for welfare recipients,someone please correct me if I’m wrong. I admire Arnold for attempting to reign in costs,prison guard salaries and pensions,but alas he is fighting a losing battle, only bankruptcy will save us now. Arnold is not perfect, but I as a Democrat do support him.
February 20, 2010 at 2:20 PM #516366moneymaker
ParticipantI believe Arnold tried to get money from the Feds for allowing the illegals into CA in the first place,Feds say no way jose. The Feds are in denial and yet I believe they are matching funds for welfare recipients,someone please correct me if I’m wrong. I admire Arnold for attempting to reign in costs,prison guard salaries and pensions,but alas he is fighting a losing battle, only bankruptcy will save us now. Arnold is not perfect, but I as a Democrat do support him.
February 20, 2010 at 2:20 PM #515707moneymaker
ParticipantI believe Arnold tried to get money from the Feds for allowing the illegals into CA in the first place,Feds say no way jose. The Feds are in denial and yet I believe they are matching funds for welfare recipients,someone please correct me if I’m wrong. I admire Arnold for attempting to reign in costs,prison guard salaries and pensions,but alas he is fighting a losing battle, only bankruptcy will save us now. Arnold is not perfect, but I as a Democrat do support him.
February 20, 2010 at 2:20 PM #516619moneymaker
ParticipantI believe Arnold tried to get money from the Feds for allowing the illegals into CA in the first place,Feds say no way jose. The Feds are in denial and yet I believe they are matching funds for welfare recipients,someone please correct me if I’m wrong. I admire Arnold for attempting to reign in costs,prison guard salaries and pensions,but alas he is fighting a losing battle, only bankruptcy will save us now. Arnold is not perfect, but I as a Democrat do support him.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.