Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Another short steal
- This topic has 300 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 8 months ago by sdrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 3, 2011 at 8:54 PM #663646February 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM #662513no_such_realityParticipant
Cornflower sold 10 days ago for 20% less/sf. Petunia sould October for 5% less.
Pyrus sold September for basically the same price.[quote] t once but twice … at Active and upon change in price … I had to be completely naked to do it third time.
[/quote]It was active a month. When did you place the call?
February 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM #662575no_such_realityParticipantCornflower sold 10 days ago for 20% less/sf. Petunia sould October for 5% less.
Pyrus sold September for basically the same price.[quote] t once but twice … at Active and upon change in price … I had to be completely naked to do it third time.
[/quote]It was active a month. When did you place the call?
February 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM #663177no_such_realityParticipantCornflower sold 10 days ago for 20% less/sf. Petunia sould October for 5% less.
Pyrus sold September for basically the same price.[quote] t once but twice … at Active and upon change in price … I had to be completely naked to do it third time.
[/quote]It was active a month. When did you place the call?
February 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM #663315no_such_realityParticipantCornflower sold 10 days ago for 20% less/sf. Petunia sould October for 5% less.
Pyrus sold September for basically the same price.[quote] t once but twice … at Active and upon change in price … I had to be completely naked to do it third time.
[/quote]It was active a month. When did you place the call?
February 3, 2011 at 8:56 PM #663651no_such_realityParticipantCornflower sold 10 days ago for 20% less/sf. Petunia sould October for 5% less.
Pyrus sold September for basically the same price.[quote] t once but twice … at Active and upon change in price … I had to be completely naked to do it third time.
[/quote]It was active a month. When did you place the call?
February 3, 2011 at 9:20 PM #662518researcher9ParticipantMan you are not from the hood … Coneflower and Petunia are Non-Ocean View properties … Those are not even the Comps here (ofcourse in MLS they say they are :)).
You are heavily weighing on $/sqft. Its a small element in the deal … if you want biggest bang on $/sqft then you should be looking at Serenata in Aviara not in Mariner’s Point/ West of Aviara PkWay.
YOu want to see the True Impact of sit down Pano Ocean View in that hood … watch out for 6707 Barberry … My estimate is getting sold for around 1.35 Million … BTW its much smaller than Coneflower and Petunia.
If you want True Pano Ocean View on Petunia then check out 6575 and 6579 Petunia.
There are no true value ocean view on coneflower and Pyrus. You dont pay for Peak Views or Views from higher foor. Those are not in “demand”.
February 3, 2011 at 9:20 PM #662580researcher9ParticipantMan you are not from the hood … Coneflower and Petunia are Non-Ocean View properties … Those are not even the Comps here (ofcourse in MLS they say they are :)).
You are heavily weighing on $/sqft. Its a small element in the deal … if you want biggest bang on $/sqft then you should be looking at Serenata in Aviara not in Mariner’s Point/ West of Aviara PkWay.
YOu want to see the True Impact of sit down Pano Ocean View in that hood … watch out for 6707 Barberry … My estimate is getting sold for around 1.35 Million … BTW its much smaller than Coneflower and Petunia.
If you want True Pano Ocean View on Petunia then check out 6575 and 6579 Petunia.
There are no true value ocean view on coneflower and Pyrus. You dont pay for Peak Views or Views from higher foor. Those are not in “demand”.
February 3, 2011 at 9:20 PM #663182researcher9ParticipantMan you are not from the hood … Coneflower and Petunia are Non-Ocean View properties … Those are not even the Comps here (ofcourse in MLS they say they are :)).
You are heavily weighing on $/sqft. Its a small element in the deal … if you want biggest bang on $/sqft then you should be looking at Serenata in Aviara not in Mariner’s Point/ West of Aviara PkWay.
YOu want to see the True Impact of sit down Pano Ocean View in that hood … watch out for 6707 Barberry … My estimate is getting sold for around 1.35 Million … BTW its much smaller than Coneflower and Petunia.
If you want True Pano Ocean View on Petunia then check out 6575 and 6579 Petunia.
There are no true value ocean view on coneflower and Pyrus. You dont pay for Peak Views or Views from higher foor. Those are not in “demand”.
February 3, 2011 at 9:20 PM #663320researcher9ParticipantMan you are not from the hood … Coneflower and Petunia are Non-Ocean View properties … Those are not even the Comps here (ofcourse in MLS they say they are :)).
You are heavily weighing on $/sqft. Its a small element in the deal … if you want biggest bang on $/sqft then you should be looking at Serenata in Aviara not in Mariner’s Point/ West of Aviara PkWay.
YOu want to see the True Impact of sit down Pano Ocean View in that hood … watch out for 6707 Barberry … My estimate is getting sold for around 1.35 Million … BTW its much smaller than Coneflower and Petunia.
If you want True Pano Ocean View on Petunia then check out 6575 and 6579 Petunia.
There are no true value ocean view on coneflower and Pyrus. You dont pay for Peak Views or Views from higher foor. Those are not in “demand”.
February 3, 2011 at 9:20 PM #663656researcher9ParticipantMan you are not from the hood … Coneflower and Petunia are Non-Ocean View properties … Those are not even the Comps here (ofcourse in MLS they say they are :)).
You are heavily weighing on $/sqft. Its a small element in the deal … if you want biggest bang on $/sqft then you should be looking at Serenata in Aviara not in Mariner’s Point/ West of Aviara PkWay.
YOu want to see the True Impact of sit down Pano Ocean View in that hood … watch out for 6707 Barberry … My estimate is getting sold for around 1.35 Million … BTW its much smaller than Coneflower and Petunia.
If you want True Pano Ocean View on Petunia then check out 6575 and 6579 Petunia.
There are no true value ocean view on coneflower and Pyrus. You dont pay for Peak Views or Views from higher foor. Those are not in “demand”.
February 3, 2011 at 10:05 PM #662533SD RealtorParticipantSounds bad researcher and I am sorry to see that it happened. So when it first came out active at 850k you made the inquiry and were told at that time that there was an accepted offer already? Well that kind of sucks.
So next time you or others in the same position get stonewalled I would advise as follows… Again, get something into the agent in writing. Also when you called and were stonewalled by the agent, why didn’t you go to the broker? That would be the next logical step. Remember listings belong to brokers and not agents. Obviously per your post you have been looking for a long time and this was what you considered a great deal. However the manner in which you lost out on it sucks. Conversely the methodology you took to try to procure it was not done in such a manner that it would discourage this type of fraudulent behavior. It is one thing to lose out on a home in a “fair” bidding war but another to lose out in this manner. Taking more concrete steps will at least prevent that in the future.
I understand your decision to throw in the towel and work directly with the listing agent but that may not work. I know everyone thinks more agents participate in fraud like this then less, but it is my experience that it is the other way around. Anyways it does suck and even with no documentation, it would not be a bad thing to go to the brokerage and sit down with the broker and tell him/her what went down. You also can still file a complaint to the dre.
Can’t hurt.
February 3, 2011 at 10:05 PM #662595SD RealtorParticipantSounds bad researcher and I am sorry to see that it happened. So when it first came out active at 850k you made the inquiry and were told at that time that there was an accepted offer already? Well that kind of sucks.
So next time you or others in the same position get stonewalled I would advise as follows… Again, get something into the agent in writing. Also when you called and were stonewalled by the agent, why didn’t you go to the broker? That would be the next logical step. Remember listings belong to brokers and not agents. Obviously per your post you have been looking for a long time and this was what you considered a great deal. However the manner in which you lost out on it sucks. Conversely the methodology you took to try to procure it was not done in such a manner that it would discourage this type of fraudulent behavior. It is one thing to lose out on a home in a “fair” bidding war but another to lose out in this manner. Taking more concrete steps will at least prevent that in the future.
I understand your decision to throw in the towel and work directly with the listing agent but that may not work. I know everyone thinks more agents participate in fraud like this then less, but it is my experience that it is the other way around. Anyways it does suck and even with no documentation, it would not be a bad thing to go to the brokerage and sit down with the broker and tell him/her what went down. You also can still file a complaint to the dre.
Can’t hurt.
February 3, 2011 at 10:05 PM #663197SD RealtorParticipantSounds bad researcher and I am sorry to see that it happened. So when it first came out active at 850k you made the inquiry and were told at that time that there was an accepted offer already? Well that kind of sucks.
So next time you or others in the same position get stonewalled I would advise as follows… Again, get something into the agent in writing. Also when you called and were stonewalled by the agent, why didn’t you go to the broker? That would be the next logical step. Remember listings belong to brokers and not agents. Obviously per your post you have been looking for a long time and this was what you considered a great deal. However the manner in which you lost out on it sucks. Conversely the methodology you took to try to procure it was not done in such a manner that it would discourage this type of fraudulent behavior. It is one thing to lose out on a home in a “fair” bidding war but another to lose out in this manner. Taking more concrete steps will at least prevent that in the future.
I understand your decision to throw in the towel and work directly with the listing agent but that may not work. I know everyone thinks more agents participate in fraud like this then less, but it is my experience that it is the other way around. Anyways it does suck and even with no documentation, it would not be a bad thing to go to the brokerage and sit down with the broker and tell him/her what went down. You also can still file a complaint to the dre.
Can’t hurt.
February 3, 2011 at 10:05 PM #663334SD RealtorParticipantSounds bad researcher and I am sorry to see that it happened. So when it first came out active at 850k you made the inquiry and were told at that time that there was an accepted offer already? Well that kind of sucks.
So next time you or others in the same position get stonewalled I would advise as follows… Again, get something into the agent in writing. Also when you called and were stonewalled by the agent, why didn’t you go to the broker? That would be the next logical step. Remember listings belong to brokers and not agents. Obviously per your post you have been looking for a long time and this was what you considered a great deal. However the manner in which you lost out on it sucks. Conversely the methodology you took to try to procure it was not done in such a manner that it would discourage this type of fraudulent behavior. It is one thing to lose out on a home in a “fair” bidding war but another to lose out in this manner. Taking more concrete steps will at least prevent that in the future.
I understand your decision to throw in the towel and work directly with the listing agent but that may not work. I know everyone thinks more agents participate in fraud like this then less, but it is my experience that it is the other way around. Anyways it does suck and even with no documentation, it would not be a bad thing to go to the brokerage and sit down with the broker and tell him/her what went down. You also can still file a complaint to the dre.
Can’t hurt.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.