Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › Another “not fraudulent” short sale listing?
- This topic has 105 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 6 months ago by
urbanrealtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 14, 2011 at 6:23 PM #696724May 15, 2011 at 10:45 AM #695549
Raybyrnes
Participant1.4 to 485. Does that make any sense
Property History
Date Event Price Appreciation Source
May 06, 2011 Sold (Public Records) $485,000 -94.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (Public Records) $1,430,000 -7.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (MLS) (Sold) $1,429,753 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 27, 2010 Pending (Contingent) — — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 18, 2010 Listed (Active) $1,399,900 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Aug 10, 2010 Sold (Public Records)
This home was foreclosedand bank-owned
. $1,571,249 — Public Records
Feb 28, 2007 Sold (Public Records) $1,933,000 7.1%/yr Public Records
Feb 10, 1988 Sold (Public Records) $525,000 — Public RecordsMay 15, 2011 at 10:45 AM #695637Raybyrnes
Participant1.4 to 485. Does that make any sense
Property History
Date Event Price Appreciation Source
May 06, 2011 Sold (Public Records) $485,000 -94.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (Public Records) $1,430,000 -7.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (MLS) (Sold) $1,429,753 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 27, 2010 Pending (Contingent) — — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 18, 2010 Listed (Active) $1,399,900 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Aug 10, 2010 Sold (Public Records)
This home was foreclosedand bank-owned
. $1,571,249 — Public Records
Feb 28, 2007 Sold (Public Records) $1,933,000 7.1%/yr Public Records
Feb 10, 1988 Sold (Public Records) $525,000 — Public RecordsMay 15, 2011 at 10:45 AM #696237Raybyrnes
Participant1.4 to 485. Does that make any sense
Property History
Date Event Price Appreciation Source
May 06, 2011 Sold (Public Records) $485,000 -94.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (Public Records) $1,430,000 -7.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (MLS) (Sold) $1,429,753 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 27, 2010 Pending (Contingent) — — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 18, 2010 Listed (Active) $1,399,900 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Aug 10, 2010 Sold (Public Records)
This home was foreclosedand bank-owned
. $1,571,249 — Public Records
Feb 28, 2007 Sold (Public Records) $1,933,000 7.1%/yr Public Records
Feb 10, 1988 Sold (Public Records) $525,000 — Public RecordsMay 15, 2011 at 10:45 AM #696385Raybyrnes
Participant1.4 to 485. Does that make any sense
Property History
Date Event Price Appreciation Source
May 06, 2011 Sold (Public Records) $485,000 -94.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (Public Records) $1,430,000 -7.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (MLS) (Sold) $1,429,753 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 27, 2010 Pending (Contingent) — — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 18, 2010 Listed (Active) $1,399,900 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Aug 10, 2010 Sold (Public Records)
This home was foreclosedand bank-owned
. $1,571,249 — Public Records
Feb 28, 2007 Sold (Public Records) $1,933,000 7.1%/yr Public Records
Feb 10, 1988 Sold (Public Records) $525,000 — Public RecordsMay 15, 2011 at 10:45 AM #696739Raybyrnes
Participant1.4 to 485. Does that make any sense
Property History
Date Event Price Appreciation Source
May 06, 2011 Sold (Public Records) $485,000 -94.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (Public Records) $1,430,000 -7.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (MLS) (Sold) $1,429,753 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 27, 2010 Pending (Contingent) — — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 18, 2010 Listed (Active) $1,399,900 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Aug 10, 2010 Sold (Public Records)
This home was foreclosedand bank-owned
. $1,571,249 — Public Records
Feb 28, 2007 Sold (Public Records) $1,933,000 7.1%/yr Public Records
Feb 10, 1988 Sold (Public Records) $525,000 — Public RecordsMay 15, 2011 at 1:09 PM #695554UCGal
Participant[quote=Raybyrnes]1.4 to 485. Does that make any sense
Property History
Date Event Price Appreciation Source
May 06, 2011 Sold (Public Records) $485,000 -94.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (Public Records) $1,430,000 -7.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (MLS) (Sold) $1,429,753 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 27, 2010 Pending (Contingent) — — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 18, 2010 Listed (Active) $1,399,900 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Aug 10, 2010 Sold (Public Records)
This home was foreclosedand bank-owned
. $1,571,249 — Public Records
Feb 28, 2007 Sold (Public Records) $1,933,000 7.1%/yr Public Records
Feb 10, 1988 Sold (Public Records) $525,000 — Public Records[/quote]
That one does look interesting… but I don’t think fraud was involved.I looked up the parcel number – and got the prop tax payers names… and plugged them into a grant deed search. It appears that the most recent “sale” was a buyout between two family members. Not arms length – and one of the previous owners still owns it, just not jointly…
At least that’s what it looked like on a cursory look.May 15, 2011 at 1:09 PM #695642UCGal
Participant[quote=Raybyrnes]1.4 to 485. Does that make any sense
Property History
Date Event Price Appreciation Source
May 06, 2011 Sold (Public Records) $485,000 -94.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (Public Records) $1,430,000 -7.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (MLS) (Sold) $1,429,753 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 27, 2010 Pending (Contingent) — — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 18, 2010 Listed (Active) $1,399,900 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Aug 10, 2010 Sold (Public Records)
This home was foreclosedand bank-owned
. $1,571,249 — Public Records
Feb 28, 2007 Sold (Public Records) $1,933,000 7.1%/yr Public Records
Feb 10, 1988 Sold (Public Records) $525,000 — Public Records[/quote]
That one does look interesting… but I don’t think fraud was involved.I looked up the parcel number – and got the prop tax payers names… and plugged them into a grant deed search. It appears that the most recent “sale” was a buyout between two family members. Not arms length – and one of the previous owners still owns it, just not jointly…
At least that’s what it looked like on a cursory look.May 15, 2011 at 1:09 PM #696242UCGal
Participant[quote=Raybyrnes]1.4 to 485. Does that make any sense
Property History
Date Event Price Appreciation Source
May 06, 2011 Sold (Public Records) $485,000 -94.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (Public Records) $1,430,000 -7.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (MLS) (Sold) $1,429,753 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 27, 2010 Pending (Contingent) — — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 18, 2010 Listed (Active) $1,399,900 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Aug 10, 2010 Sold (Public Records)
This home was foreclosedand bank-owned
. $1,571,249 — Public Records
Feb 28, 2007 Sold (Public Records) $1,933,000 7.1%/yr Public Records
Feb 10, 1988 Sold (Public Records) $525,000 — Public Records[/quote]
That one does look interesting… but I don’t think fraud was involved.I looked up the parcel number – and got the prop tax payers names… and plugged them into a grant deed search. It appears that the most recent “sale” was a buyout between two family members. Not arms length – and one of the previous owners still owns it, just not jointly…
At least that’s what it looked like on a cursory look.May 15, 2011 at 1:09 PM #696390UCGal
Participant[quote=Raybyrnes]1.4 to 485. Does that make any sense
Property History
Date Event Price Appreciation Source
May 06, 2011 Sold (Public Records) $485,000 -94.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (Public Records) $1,430,000 -7.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (MLS) (Sold) $1,429,753 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 27, 2010 Pending (Contingent) — — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 18, 2010 Listed (Active) $1,399,900 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Aug 10, 2010 Sold (Public Records)
This home was foreclosedand bank-owned
. $1,571,249 — Public Records
Feb 28, 2007 Sold (Public Records) $1,933,000 7.1%/yr Public Records
Feb 10, 1988 Sold (Public Records) $525,000 — Public Records[/quote]
That one does look interesting… but I don’t think fraud was involved.I looked up the parcel number – and got the prop tax payers names… and plugged them into a grant deed search. It appears that the most recent “sale” was a buyout between two family members. Not arms length – and one of the previous owners still owns it, just not jointly…
At least that’s what it looked like on a cursory look.May 15, 2011 at 1:09 PM #696744UCGal
Participant[quote=Raybyrnes]1.4 to 485. Does that make any sense
Property History
Date Event Price Appreciation Source
May 06, 2011 Sold (Public Records) $485,000 -94.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (Public Records) $1,430,000 -7.6%/yr Public Records
Dec 22, 2010 Sold (MLS) (Sold) $1,429,753 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 27, 2010 Pending (Contingent) — — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Oct 18, 2010 Listed (Active) $1,399,900 — Inactive SANDICOR #100061753
Aug 10, 2010 Sold (Public Records)
This home was foreclosedand bank-owned
. $1,571,249 — Public Records
Feb 28, 2007 Sold (Public Records) $1,933,000 7.1%/yr Public Records
Feb 10, 1988 Sold (Public Records) $525,000 — Public Records[/quote]
That one does look interesting… but I don’t think fraud was involved.I looked up the parcel number – and got the prop tax payers names… and plugged them into a grant deed search. It appears that the most recent “sale” was a buyout between two family members. Not arms length – and one of the previous owners still owns it, just not jointly…
At least that’s what it looked like on a cursory look.May 15, 2011 at 5:26 PM #695559urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=UCGal]
That one does look interesting… but I don’t think fraud was involved.I looked up the parcel number – and got the prop tax payers names… and plugged them into a grant deed search. It appears that the most recent “sale” was a buyout between two family members. Not arms length – and one of the previous owners still owns it, just not jointly…
At least that’s what it looked like on a cursory look.[/quote]Mr. Oliver deeded it to the Oliver trust 4 months after he bought it.
Sometimes people assign a dollar amount to the property (or some portion thereof or the fractional interest being deeded) at the time they do that.
Not exactly a smoking birth certificate.
People use the word fraud pretty loosely around here.
May 15, 2011 at 5:26 PM #695647urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=UCGal]
That one does look interesting… but I don’t think fraud was involved.I looked up the parcel number – and got the prop tax payers names… and plugged them into a grant deed search. It appears that the most recent “sale” was a buyout between two family members. Not arms length – and one of the previous owners still owns it, just not jointly…
At least that’s what it looked like on a cursory look.[/quote]Mr. Oliver deeded it to the Oliver trust 4 months after he bought it.
Sometimes people assign a dollar amount to the property (or some portion thereof or the fractional interest being deeded) at the time they do that.
Not exactly a smoking birth certificate.
People use the word fraud pretty loosely around here.
May 15, 2011 at 5:26 PM #696247urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=UCGal]
That one does look interesting… but I don’t think fraud was involved.I looked up the parcel number – and got the prop tax payers names… and plugged them into a grant deed search. It appears that the most recent “sale” was a buyout between two family members. Not arms length – and one of the previous owners still owns it, just not jointly…
At least that’s what it looked like on a cursory look.[/quote]Mr. Oliver deeded it to the Oliver trust 4 months after he bought it.
Sometimes people assign a dollar amount to the property (or some portion thereof or the fractional interest being deeded) at the time they do that.
Not exactly a smoking birth certificate.
People use the word fraud pretty loosely around here.
May 15, 2011 at 5:26 PM #696395urbanrealtor
Participant[quote=UCGal]
That one does look interesting… but I don’t think fraud was involved.I looked up the parcel number – and got the prop tax payers names… and plugged them into a grant deed search. It appears that the most recent “sale” was a buyout between two family members. Not arms length – and one of the previous owners still owns it, just not jointly…
At least that’s what it looked like on a cursory look.[/quote]Mr. Oliver deeded it to the Oliver trust 4 months after he bought it.
Sometimes people assign a dollar amount to the property (or some portion thereof or the fractional interest being deeded) at the time they do that.
Not exactly a smoking birth certificate.
People use the word fraud pretty loosely around here.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.
