- This topic has 40 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 10 months ago by sd_matt.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 7, 2010 at 3:57 AM #500397January 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM #500479ucodegenParticipant
After reading the article I noticed it is over 2 years old. Asked one of the drivers for Jeep at the auto show if Jeep was considering coming out with a decent diesel engine, you know around 4 litre or so, he said no, how unfortunate.
Actually the Jeep Liberty has a diesel engine option.. just can’t get in California because of emissions (NOx)..
http://www.edmunds.com/jeep/liberty/review.html
Third paragraph.. also lower down:Of special note is that Jeep offered a diesel engine option for 2005 and ’06. This 2.8-liter turbocharged four-cylinder diesel provided 160 hp and 295 pound-feet of torque.
But considering that Chrysler never got the engine into the Wranger, etc.. it is no wonder the company is where it ended up. Many off-roaders were/are clamoring for a diesel in a Wrangler, particularly the Rubicon. It looks like Fiat may have woken Chrysler up though..
Another interesting take on the diesel wrangler/ semi custom..
http://www.automobilemag.com/features/great_drives/0912_jeep_aev_j8_milspec/index.htmlJanuary 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM #499987ucodegenParticipantAfter reading the article I noticed it is over 2 years old. Asked one of the drivers for Jeep at the auto show if Jeep was considering coming out with a decent diesel engine, you know around 4 litre or so, he said no, how unfortunate.
Actually the Jeep Liberty has a diesel engine option.. just can’t get in California because of emissions (NOx)..
http://www.edmunds.com/jeep/liberty/review.html
Third paragraph.. also lower down:Of special note is that Jeep offered a diesel engine option for 2005 and ’06. This 2.8-liter turbocharged four-cylinder diesel provided 160 hp and 295 pound-feet of torque.
But considering that Chrysler never got the engine into the Wranger, etc.. it is no wonder the company is where it ended up. Many off-roaders were/are clamoring for a diesel in a Wrangler, particularly the Rubicon. It looks like Fiat may have woken Chrysler up though..
Another interesting take on the diesel wrangler/ semi custom..
http://www.automobilemag.com/features/great_drives/0912_jeep_aev_j8_milspec/index.htmlJanuary 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM #499834ucodegenParticipantAfter reading the article I noticed it is over 2 years old. Asked one of the drivers for Jeep at the auto show if Jeep was considering coming out with a decent diesel engine, you know around 4 litre or so, he said no, how unfortunate.
Actually the Jeep Liberty has a diesel engine option.. just can’t get in California because of emissions (NOx)..
http://www.edmunds.com/jeep/liberty/review.html
Third paragraph.. also lower down:Of special note is that Jeep offered a diesel engine option for 2005 and ’06. This 2.8-liter turbocharged four-cylinder diesel provided 160 hp and 295 pound-feet of torque.
But considering that Chrysler never got the engine into the Wranger, etc.. it is no wonder the company is where it ended up. Many off-roaders were/are clamoring for a diesel in a Wrangler, particularly the Rubicon. It looks like Fiat may have woken Chrysler up though..
Another interesting take on the diesel wrangler/ semi custom..
http://www.automobilemag.com/features/great_drives/0912_jeep_aev_j8_milspec/index.htmlJanuary 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM #500384ucodegenParticipantAfter reading the article I noticed it is over 2 years old. Asked one of the drivers for Jeep at the auto show if Jeep was considering coming out with a decent diesel engine, you know around 4 litre or so, he said no, how unfortunate.
Actually the Jeep Liberty has a diesel engine option.. just can’t get in California because of emissions (NOx)..
http://www.edmunds.com/jeep/liberty/review.html
Third paragraph.. also lower down:Of special note is that Jeep offered a diesel engine option for 2005 and ’06. This 2.8-liter turbocharged four-cylinder diesel provided 160 hp and 295 pound-feet of torque.
But considering that Chrysler never got the engine into the Wranger, etc.. it is no wonder the company is where it ended up. Many off-roaders were/are clamoring for a diesel in a Wrangler, particularly the Rubicon. It looks like Fiat may have woken Chrysler up though..
Another interesting take on the diesel wrangler/ semi custom..
http://www.automobilemag.com/features/great_drives/0912_jeep_aev_j8_milspec/index.htmlJanuary 7, 2010 at 12:17 PM #500726ucodegenParticipantAfter reading the article I noticed it is over 2 years old. Asked one of the drivers for Jeep at the auto show if Jeep was considering coming out with a decent diesel engine, you know around 4 litre or so, he said no, how unfortunate.
Actually the Jeep Liberty has a diesel engine option.. just can’t get in California because of emissions (NOx)..
http://www.edmunds.com/jeep/liberty/review.html
Third paragraph.. also lower down:Of special note is that Jeep offered a diesel engine option for 2005 and ’06. This 2.8-liter turbocharged four-cylinder diesel provided 160 hp and 295 pound-feet of torque.
But considering that Chrysler never got the engine into the Wranger, etc.. it is no wonder the company is where it ended up. Many off-roaders were/are clamoring for a diesel in a Wrangler, particularly the Rubicon. It looks like Fiat may have woken Chrysler up though..
Another interesting take on the diesel wrangler/ semi custom..
http://www.automobilemag.com/features/great_drives/0912_jeep_aev_j8_milspec/index.htmlJanuary 8, 2010 at 6:58 AM #500094sd_mattParticipantMaybe the magazine should rename itself “Fast Alchemy”
January 8, 2010 at 6:58 AM #500645sd_mattParticipantMaybe the magazine should rename itself “Fast Alchemy”
January 8, 2010 at 6:58 AM #500245sd_mattParticipantMaybe the magazine should rename itself “Fast Alchemy”
January 8, 2010 at 6:58 AM #500737sd_mattParticipantMaybe the magazine should rename itself “Fast Alchemy”
January 8, 2010 at 6:58 AM #500985sd_mattParticipantMaybe the magazine should rename itself “Fast Alchemy”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.