Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › Am I getting this Oil thing right?
- This topic has 105 replies, 9 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 4 months ago by
renterclint.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 23, 2008 at 1:47 PM #13390July 23, 2008 at 1:57 PM #245290
an
ParticipantSpeculation can work both way. Speculation just amplify the supply & demand imbalance. Right, people think demand will out strip supply, so they bet that price will go up. However, if the imbalance swing the other way, where supply is suspected to dramatically increase or if demand is expected to dramatically decrease, price would drop through the floor, well pass the “fundamental” price. So, instead of trying to patch the problem by going after “speculators”, why not fix the root cause of the problem, which is supply & demand imbalance.
July 23, 2008 at 1:57 PM #245440an
ParticipantSpeculation can work both way. Speculation just amplify the supply & demand imbalance. Right, people think demand will out strip supply, so they bet that price will go up. However, if the imbalance swing the other way, where supply is suspected to dramatically increase or if demand is expected to dramatically decrease, price would drop through the floor, well pass the “fundamental” price. So, instead of trying to patch the problem by going after “speculators”, why not fix the root cause of the problem, which is supply & demand imbalance.
July 23, 2008 at 1:57 PM #245449an
ParticipantSpeculation can work both way. Speculation just amplify the supply & demand imbalance. Right, people think demand will out strip supply, so they bet that price will go up. However, if the imbalance swing the other way, where supply is suspected to dramatically increase or if demand is expected to dramatically decrease, price would drop through the floor, well pass the “fundamental” price. So, instead of trying to patch the problem by going after “speculators”, why not fix the root cause of the problem, which is supply & demand imbalance.
July 23, 2008 at 1:57 PM #245503an
ParticipantSpeculation can work both way. Speculation just amplify the supply & demand imbalance. Right, people think demand will out strip supply, so they bet that price will go up. However, if the imbalance swing the other way, where supply is suspected to dramatically increase or if demand is expected to dramatically decrease, price would drop through the floor, well pass the “fundamental” price. So, instead of trying to patch the problem by going after “speculators”, why not fix the root cause of the problem, which is supply & demand imbalance.
July 23, 2008 at 1:57 PM #245512an
ParticipantSpeculation can work both way. Speculation just amplify the supply & demand imbalance. Right, people think demand will out strip supply, so they bet that price will go up. However, if the imbalance swing the other way, where supply is suspected to dramatically increase or if demand is expected to dramatically decrease, price would drop through the floor, well pass the “fundamental” price. So, instead of trying to patch the problem by going after “speculators”, why not fix the root cause of the problem, which is supply & demand imbalance.
July 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM #245300renterclint
ParticipantThanks for the input asianautica. That’s interesting about the impact in both directions. I hadn’t thought of that.
Even if addressing the problem re: excess speculation is a “patch” it seems like an easy fix to at least stabilize things in the near term.
I am not against opening refineries or more drilling, but those are more long-term solutions as I understand it.
July 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM #245450renterclint
ParticipantThanks for the input asianautica. That’s interesting about the impact in both directions. I hadn’t thought of that.
Even if addressing the problem re: excess speculation is a “patch” it seems like an easy fix to at least stabilize things in the near term.
I am not against opening refineries or more drilling, but those are more long-term solutions as I understand it.
July 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM #245459renterclint
ParticipantThanks for the input asianautica. That’s interesting about the impact in both directions. I hadn’t thought of that.
Even if addressing the problem re: excess speculation is a “patch” it seems like an easy fix to at least stabilize things in the near term.
I am not against opening refineries or more drilling, but those are more long-term solutions as I understand it.
July 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM #245513renterclint
ParticipantThanks for the input asianautica. That’s interesting about the impact in both directions. I hadn’t thought of that.
Even if addressing the problem re: excess speculation is a “patch” it seems like an easy fix to at least stabilize things in the near term.
I am not against opening refineries or more drilling, but those are more long-term solutions as I understand it.
July 23, 2008 at 2:11 PM #245522renterclint
ParticipantThanks for the input asianautica. That’s interesting about the impact in both directions. I hadn’t thought of that.
Even if addressing the problem re: excess speculation is a “patch” it seems like an easy fix to at least stabilize things in the near term.
I am not against opening refineries or more drilling, but those are more long-term solutions as I understand it.
July 23, 2008 at 2:25 PM #245310an
ParticipantI agree that more drilling and refineries will be a long-term solution. But I don’t like “patch” solution for short term. I would rather them put a massive tax to reduce the demand by 20-30%. That would cause price to swing the other way. The extra tax $ can be put to use in drilling/refining/ and alternative fuel research.
July 23, 2008 at 2:25 PM #245460an
ParticipantI agree that more drilling and refineries will be a long-term solution. But I don’t like “patch” solution for short term. I would rather them put a massive tax to reduce the demand by 20-30%. That would cause price to swing the other way. The extra tax $ can be put to use in drilling/refining/ and alternative fuel research.
July 23, 2008 at 2:25 PM #245469an
ParticipantI agree that more drilling and refineries will be a long-term solution. But I don’t like “patch” solution for short term. I would rather them put a massive tax to reduce the demand by 20-30%. That would cause price to swing the other way. The extra tax $ can be put to use in drilling/refining/ and alternative fuel research.
July 23, 2008 at 2:25 PM #245524an
ParticipantI agree that more drilling and refineries will be a long-term solution. But I don’t like “patch” solution for short term. I would rather them put a massive tax to reduce the demand by 20-30%. That would cause price to swing the other way. The extra tax $ can be put to use in drilling/refining/ and alternative fuel research.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
