- This topic has 485 replies, 28 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 3 months ago by Arraya.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 23, 2011 at 11:31 AM #724255August 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM #723079ucodegenParticipant
[quote Arraya]An interesting comparison in sub-cultures is the Scots-Irish. The Scots-Irish were predominately farmers in the appalachian and southern united US pre-WWII. After the war with industrialization and the consolidation of the farming industry they moved into factories(like blacks) and with the advent of outsourcing had their lively hood taken away again.
Now they predominately work at Wall Marts and meth labs, have no insurance, high crime rates, high rates of teen pregnancy, no high-school degree, etc… Which are now turning into kind of a tweaked-out hillbilly gangster culture with creepy strains of dominionism christianity throughout.[/quote]
Excuse me?? You have to be joking. You might want to have some numbers back that up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_American
Joe Biden, Kennedy, Andrew Jackson, Grant.. They may have started ‘back country’..August 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM #723168ucodegenParticipant[quote Arraya]An interesting comparison in sub-cultures is the Scots-Irish. The Scots-Irish were predominately farmers in the appalachian and southern united US pre-WWII. After the war with industrialization and the consolidation of the farming industry they moved into factories(like blacks) and with the advent of outsourcing had their lively hood taken away again.
Now they predominately work at Wall Marts and meth labs, have no insurance, high crime rates, high rates of teen pregnancy, no high-school degree, etc… Which are now turning into kind of a tweaked-out hillbilly gangster culture with creepy strains of dominionism christianity throughout.[/quote]
Excuse me?? You have to be joking. You might want to have some numbers back that up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_American
Joe Biden, Kennedy, Andrew Jackson, Grant.. They may have started ‘back country’..August 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM #723762ucodegenParticipant[quote Arraya]An interesting comparison in sub-cultures is the Scots-Irish. The Scots-Irish were predominately farmers in the appalachian and southern united US pre-WWII. After the war with industrialization and the consolidation of the farming industry they moved into factories(like blacks) and with the advent of outsourcing had their lively hood taken away again.
Now they predominately work at Wall Marts and meth labs, have no insurance, high crime rates, high rates of teen pregnancy, no high-school degree, etc… Which are now turning into kind of a tweaked-out hillbilly gangster culture with creepy strains of dominionism christianity throughout.[/quote]
Excuse me?? You have to be joking. You might want to have some numbers back that up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_American
Joe Biden, Kennedy, Andrew Jackson, Grant.. They may have started ‘back country’..August 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM #723917ucodegenParticipant[quote Arraya]An interesting comparison in sub-cultures is the Scots-Irish. The Scots-Irish were predominately farmers in the appalachian and southern united US pre-WWII. After the war with industrialization and the consolidation of the farming industry they moved into factories(like blacks) and with the advent of outsourcing had their lively hood taken away again.
Now they predominately work at Wall Marts and meth labs, have no insurance, high crime rates, high rates of teen pregnancy, no high-school degree, etc… Which are now turning into kind of a tweaked-out hillbilly gangster culture with creepy strains of dominionism christianity throughout.[/quote]
Excuse me?? You have to be joking. You might want to have some numbers back that up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_American
Joe Biden, Kennedy, Andrew Jackson, Grant.. They may have started ‘back country’..August 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM #724275ucodegenParticipant[quote Arraya]An interesting comparison in sub-cultures is the Scots-Irish. The Scots-Irish were predominately farmers in the appalachian and southern united US pre-WWII. After the war with industrialization and the consolidation of the farming industry they moved into factories(like blacks) and with the advent of outsourcing had their lively hood taken away again.
Now they predominately work at Wall Marts and meth labs, have no insurance, high crime rates, high rates of teen pregnancy, no high-school degree, etc… Which are now turning into kind of a tweaked-out hillbilly gangster culture with creepy strains of dominionism christianity throughout.[/quote]
Excuse me?? You have to be joking. You might want to have some numbers back that up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_American
Joe Biden, Kennedy, Andrew Jackson, Grant.. They may have started ‘back country’..August 23, 2011 at 12:30 PM #723084ArrayaParticipantFirst off – Scots-Irish is different than Irish. Second, their plight is documented after WWII. They are the great white underclass. And yes, some did escape their path. Second, Biden and Kennedy don’t qualify. Andrew Jackson is one, though, I am not sure of Grant.
It’s a sad story actually, that most could not pull out of this now decaying drug ridden sub-culture. White people especially don’t like talking about the white underclass, that are mostly Scots-Irish.
It’s a good case study.
A book written by one
Set between 1950 and 1963, this coming-of-age memoir discusses one of America’s most taboo subjects: social class. Combining recollections, accounts, and analysis, this book leans on Maw, Pap, Ony Mae, and other members of this rambunctious Scots-Irish family to chronicle the often heartbreaking postwar journey of 22 million rural Americans into the cities, where they became the foundation of a permanent white underclass. Telling the stories of the gun-owning, uninsured, underemployed white tribes inhabiting America’s heartlands, this record offers an intimate look at what was lost in the orchestrated postwar shift from an agricultural to an urban consumer society.[img_assist|nid=15280|title=..|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=200|height=200]
August 23, 2011 at 12:30 PM #723173ArrayaParticipantFirst off – Scots-Irish is different than Irish. Second, their plight is documented after WWII. They are the great white underclass. And yes, some did escape their path. Second, Biden and Kennedy don’t qualify. Andrew Jackson is one, though, I am not sure of Grant.
It’s a sad story actually, that most could not pull out of this now decaying drug ridden sub-culture. White people especially don’t like talking about the white underclass, that are mostly Scots-Irish.
It’s a good case study.
A book written by one
Set between 1950 and 1963, this coming-of-age memoir discusses one of America’s most taboo subjects: social class. Combining recollections, accounts, and analysis, this book leans on Maw, Pap, Ony Mae, and other members of this rambunctious Scots-Irish family to chronicle the often heartbreaking postwar journey of 22 million rural Americans into the cities, where they became the foundation of a permanent white underclass. Telling the stories of the gun-owning, uninsured, underemployed white tribes inhabiting America’s heartlands, this record offers an intimate look at what was lost in the orchestrated postwar shift from an agricultural to an urban consumer society.[img_assist|nid=15280|title=..|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=200|height=200]
August 23, 2011 at 12:30 PM #723767ArrayaParticipantFirst off – Scots-Irish is different than Irish. Second, their plight is documented after WWII. They are the great white underclass. And yes, some did escape their path. Second, Biden and Kennedy don’t qualify. Andrew Jackson is one, though, I am not sure of Grant.
It’s a sad story actually, that most could not pull out of this now decaying drug ridden sub-culture. White people especially don’t like talking about the white underclass, that are mostly Scots-Irish.
It’s a good case study.
A book written by one
Set between 1950 and 1963, this coming-of-age memoir discusses one of America’s most taboo subjects: social class. Combining recollections, accounts, and analysis, this book leans on Maw, Pap, Ony Mae, and other members of this rambunctious Scots-Irish family to chronicle the often heartbreaking postwar journey of 22 million rural Americans into the cities, where they became the foundation of a permanent white underclass. Telling the stories of the gun-owning, uninsured, underemployed white tribes inhabiting America’s heartlands, this record offers an intimate look at what was lost in the orchestrated postwar shift from an agricultural to an urban consumer society.[img_assist|nid=15280|title=..|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=200|height=200]
August 23, 2011 at 12:30 PM #723922ArrayaParticipantFirst off – Scots-Irish is different than Irish. Second, their plight is documented after WWII. They are the great white underclass. And yes, some did escape their path. Second, Biden and Kennedy don’t qualify. Andrew Jackson is one, though, I am not sure of Grant.
It’s a sad story actually, that most could not pull out of this now decaying drug ridden sub-culture. White people especially don’t like talking about the white underclass, that are mostly Scots-Irish.
It’s a good case study.
A book written by one
Set between 1950 and 1963, this coming-of-age memoir discusses one of America’s most taboo subjects: social class. Combining recollections, accounts, and analysis, this book leans on Maw, Pap, Ony Mae, and other members of this rambunctious Scots-Irish family to chronicle the often heartbreaking postwar journey of 22 million rural Americans into the cities, where they became the foundation of a permanent white underclass. Telling the stories of the gun-owning, uninsured, underemployed white tribes inhabiting America’s heartlands, this record offers an intimate look at what was lost in the orchestrated postwar shift from an agricultural to an urban consumer society.[img_assist|nid=15280|title=..|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=200|height=200]
August 23, 2011 at 12:30 PM #724280ArrayaParticipantFirst off – Scots-Irish is different than Irish. Second, their plight is documented after WWII. They are the great white underclass. And yes, some did escape their path. Second, Biden and Kennedy don’t qualify. Andrew Jackson is one, though, I am not sure of Grant.
It’s a sad story actually, that most could not pull out of this now decaying drug ridden sub-culture. White people especially don’t like talking about the white underclass, that are mostly Scots-Irish.
It’s a good case study.
A book written by one
Set between 1950 and 1963, this coming-of-age memoir discusses one of America’s most taboo subjects: social class. Combining recollections, accounts, and analysis, this book leans on Maw, Pap, Ony Mae, and other members of this rambunctious Scots-Irish family to chronicle the often heartbreaking postwar journey of 22 million rural Americans into the cities, where they became the foundation of a permanent white underclass. Telling the stories of the gun-owning, uninsured, underemployed white tribes inhabiting America’s heartlands, this record offers an intimate look at what was lost in the orchestrated postwar shift from an agricultural to an urban consumer society.[img_assist|nid=15280|title=..|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=200|height=200]
August 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM #723094jpinpbParticipantUltimately, it really depends on who you would be comfortable having live in your home. Sure there are stereotypes and some of those are carried on and perpetuated by the people themselves. If a black man came to your house in a suit and worked at a stock brokerage company, would you consider him? If a black man came to your house w/a baseball cap backwards and baggy pants down past his butt, working part time would you consider him?
I know this may seem like appearances, but it’s more than that. It’s presentation and what they think of themselves, too. If Hally Berry or Penélope Cruz look-alike came to your house looking for a room to rent, would you say no b/c strictly b/c of their race?
There’s more to this than just race. There’s so many factors to consider besides their job and ability to pay rent and cleanliness and even hobbies. If some white guy wanted to rent a room from me and he played drums in a band and would practice 20 hours a week, I might not want to have him as a roommate.
And of course religion would be considered, as well. If a born-again christian wanted to rent a room from me and I sensed they would be preaching and wanting to convert me, I maybe wouldn’t rent a room to them.
Excuse the pun, but it’s not just so black and white.
And as far as discrimination, I think one should be somewhat discriminating about with whom they will be sharing a home.
August 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM #723183jpinpbParticipantUltimately, it really depends on who you would be comfortable having live in your home. Sure there are stereotypes and some of those are carried on and perpetuated by the people themselves. If a black man came to your house in a suit and worked at a stock brokerage company, would you consider him? If a black man came to your house w/a baseball cap backwards and baggy pants down past his butt, working part time would you consider him?
I know this may seem like appearances, but it’s more than that. It’s presentation and what they think of themselves, too. If Hally Berry or Penélope Cruz look-alike came to your house looking for a room to rent, would you say no b/c strictly b/c of their race?
There’s more to this than just race. There’s so many factors to consider besides their job and ability to pay rent and cleanliness and even hobbies. If some white guy wanted to rent a room from me and he played drums in a band and would practice 20 hours a week, I might not want to have him as a roommate.
And of course religion would be considered, as well. If a born-again christian wanted to rent a room from me and I sensed they would be preaching and wanting to convert me, I maybe wouldn’t rent a room to them.
Excuse the pun, but it’s not just so black and white.
And as far as discrimination, I think one should be somewhat discriminating about with whom they will be sharing a home.
August 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM #723777jpinpbParticipantUltimately, it really depends on who you would be comfortable having live in your home. Sure there are stereotypes and some of those are carried on and perpetuated by the people themselves. If a black man came to your house in a suit and worked at a stock brokerage company, would you consider him? If a black man came to your house w/a baseball cap backwards and baggy pants down past his butt, working part time would you consider him?
I know this may seem like appearances, but it’s more than that. It’s presentation and what they think of themselves, too. If Hally Berry or Penélope Cruz look-alike came to your house looking for a room to rent, would you say no b/c strictly b/c of their race?
There’s more to this than just race. There’s so many factors to consider besides their job and ability to pay rent and cleanliness and even hobbies. If some white guy wanted to rent a room from me and he played drums in a band and would practice 20 hours a week, I might not want to have him as a roommate.
And of course religion would be considered, as well. If a born-again christian wanted to rent a room from me and I sensed they would be preaching and wanting to convert me, I maybe wouldn’t rent a room to them.
Excuse the pun, but it’s not just so black and white.
And as far as discrimination, I think one should be somewhat discriminating about with whom they will be sharing a home.
August 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM #723931jpinpbParticipantUltimately, it really depends on who you would be comfortable having live in your home. Sure there are stereotypes and some of those are carried on and perpetuated by the people themselves. If a black man came to your house in a suit and worked at a stock brokerage company, would you consider him? If a black man came to your house w/a baseball cap backwards and baggy pants down past his butt, working part time would you consider him?
I know this may seem like appearances, but it’s more than that. It’s presentation and what they think of themselves, too. If Hally Berry or Penélope Cruz look-alike came to your house looking for a room to rent, would you say no b/c strictly b/c of their race?
There’s more to this than just race. There’s so many factors to consider besides their job and ability to pay rent and cleanliness and even hobbies. If some white guy wanted to rent a room from me and he played drums in a band and would practice 20 hours a week, I might not want to have him as a roommate.
And of course religion would be considered, as well. If a born-again christian wanted to rent a room from me and I sensed they would be preaching and wanting to convert me, I maybe wouldn’t rent a room to them.
Excuse the pun, but it’s not just so black and white.
And as far as discrimination, I think one should be somewhat discriminating about with whom they will be sharing a home.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.