Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Buying and Selling RE › Agricultural water rate?
- This topic has 140 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 5 months ago by fm.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 21, 2008 at 7:41 AM #243830July 21, 2008 at 10:23 AM #243713peterbParticipant
Agribusiness uses over 80% of CA’s water consumption. Of that, Cotton,rice and alphalfa take the lions share. Residential consumption is very small and thus does not matter much when it comes to reductions or conservation of any kind. If the state govt really gets worried, they can just quit giving these special, high consumption crops anymore deals on water.
July 21, 2008 at 10:23 AM #243855peterbParticipantAgribusiness uses over 80% of CA’s water consumption. Of that, Cotton,rice and alphalfa take the lions share. Residential consumption is very small and thus does not matter much when it comes to reductions or conservation of any kind. If the state govt really gets worried, they can just quit giving these special, high consumption crops anymore deals on water.
July 21, 2008 at 10:23 AM #243863peterbParticipantAgribusiness uses over 80% of CA’s water consumption. Of that, Cotton,rice and alphalfa take the lions share. Residential consumption is very small and thus does not matter much when it comes to reductions or conservation of any kind. If the state govt really gets worried, they can just quit giving these special, high consumption crops anymore deals on water.
July 21, 2008 at 10:23 AM #243917peterbParticipantAgribusiness uses over 80% of CA’s water consumption. Of that, Cotton,rice and alphalfa take the lions share. Residential consumption is very small and thus does not matter much when it comes to reductions or conservation of any kind. If the state govt really gets worried, they can just quit giving these special, high consumption crops anymore deals on water.
July 21, 2008 at 10:23 AM #243925peterbParticipantAgribusiness uses over 80% of CA’s water consumption. Of that, Cotton,rice and alphalfa take the lions share. Residential consumption is very small and thus does not matter much when it comes to reductions or conservation of any kind. If the state govt really gets worried, they can just quit giving these special, high consumption crops anymore deals on water.
July 21, 2008 at 11:00 AM #243731EugeneParticipantif they are not done properly there are serious health risks. The water cannot be airborne and there are a litany of safety measures to put in.
Would it be safe and healthy to sit on that grass, or eat vegetables that were watered with gray water? If not, it mostly defeats reasons to have the lawn in the first place.
Agribusiness uses over 80% of CA’s water consumption. Of that, Cotton,rice and alphalfa take the lions share.
Shocking if true. Why would we grow such a water-intensive crop as rice in CA?
July 21, 2008 at 11:00 AM #243875EugeneParticipantif they are not done properly there are serious health risks. The water cannot be airborne and there are a litany of safety measures to put in.
Would it be safe and healthy to sit on that grass, or eat vegetables that were watered with gray water? If not, it mostly defeats reasons to have the lawn in the first place.
Agribusiness uses over 80% of CA’s water consumption. Of that, Cotton,rice and alphalfa take the lions share.
Shocking if true. Why would we grow such a water-intensive crop as rice in CA?
July 21, 2008 at 11:00 AM #243883EugeneParticipantif they are not done properly there are serious health risks. The water cannot be airborne and there are a litany of safety measures to put in.
Would it be safe and healthy to sit on that grass, or eat vegetables that were watered with gray water? If not, it mostly defeats reasons to have the lawn in the first place.
Agribusiness uses over 80% of CA’s water consumption. Of that, Cotton,rice and alphalfa take the lions share.
Shocking if true. Why would we grow such a water-intensive crop as rice in CA?
July 21, 2008 at 11:00 AM #243937EugeneParticipantif they are not done properly there are serious health risks. The water cannot be airborne and there are a litany of safety measures to put in.
Would it be safe and healthy to sit on that grass, or eat vegetables that were watered with gray water? If not, it mostly defeats reasons to have the lawn in the first place.
Agribusiness uses over 80% of CA’s water consumption. Of that, Cotton,rice and alphalfa take the lions share.
Shocking if true. Why would we grow such a water-intensive crop as rice in CA?
July 21, 2008 at 11:00 AM #243944EugeneParticipantif they are not done properly there are serious health risks. The water cannot be airborne and there are a litany of safety measures to put in.
Would it be safe and healthy to sit on that grass, or eat vegetables that were watered with gray water? If not, it mostly defeats reasons to have the lawn in the first place.
Agribusiness uses over 80% of CA’s water consumption. Of that, Cotton,rice and alphalfa take the lions share.
Shocking if true. Why would we grow such a water-intensive crop as rice in CA?
July 21, 2008 at 11:29 AM #243748peterbParticipantCA govt gives away water to agribusiness
July 21, 2008 at 11:29 AM #243889peterbParticipantCA govt gives away water to agribusiness
July 21, 2008 at 11:29 AM #243898peterbParticipantCA govt gives away water to agribusiness
July 21, 2008 at 11:29 AM #243953peterbParticipantCA govt gives away water to agribusiness
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Buying and Selling RE’ is closed to new topics and replies.