Affairs of the heart…

[scaredyclassic]

it may be worth noting that among various guides for players that it is advisable not to spend money on women because it shifts the balance of power to her–that is, the guy who tries to win the affection of a woman by spending money often gets nowehere, while the bad boy who keeps the woman guessing and who playfully insults her usually actually gets the girl. i think this tends to be true, that women are more attracted to you when you act like you don’t need them. might not be rue for you, but if this guy is playing the odds, the odds are he’s gottena bette response in general from women when he doesn’t try to buy their affection, when he acts like he can take em or leave em, has options, and that you shoudl be chasing him, not the other way around. i dont agree he’s necessarily been putt hrought he wringer, it’s really the only way to reliably get lots of action, statsitcially speaking, from women.

Drink Heavily.

[pepsi]

prenup should protect asset you have Before entering marriage. It does not protect wealth created during the marriage.

 

[pepsi]

prenup should protect asset you have Before entering marriage. It does not protect wealth created during the marriage.

 

[pepsi]

prenup should protect asset you have Before entering marriage. It does not protect wealth created during the marriage.

 

[pepsi]

prenup should protect asset you have Before entering marriage. It does not protect wealth created during the marriage.

 

[pepsi]

prenup should protect asset you have Before entering marriage. It does not protect wealth created during the marriage.

 

[Anonymous]

dave: “Since he’s told you that he’d like to sleep with you, tell him that he’ll be able to sleep with you in exchange for this nice date. I think you’ll be on the road toward a mutually beneficial relationship with very little confusion between you.”

So in following your plan, I will have effectively changed my profession to that of a hooker.

Thanks.

[Anonymous]

dave: “Since he’s told you that he’d like to sleep with you, tell him that he’ll be able to sleep with you in exchange for this nice date. I think you’ll be on the road toward a mutually beneficial relationship with very little confusion between you.”

So in following your plan, I will have effectively changed my profession to that of a hooker.

Thanks.

[Anonymous]

dave: “Since he’s told you that he’d like to sleep with you, tell him that he’ll be able to sleep with you in exchange for this nice date. I think you’ll be on the road toward a mutually beneficial relationship with very little confusion between you.”

So in following your plan, I will have effectively changed my profession to that of a hooker.

Thanks.

[Anonymous]

dave: “Since he’s told you that he’d like to sleep with you, tell him that he’ll be able to sleep with you in exchange for this nice date. I think you’ll be on the road toward a mutually beneficial relationship with very little confusion between you.”

So in following your plan, I will have effectively changed my profession to that of a hooker.

Thanks.

[Anonymous]

dave: “Since he’s told you that he’d like to sleep with you, tell him that he’ll be able to sleep with you in exchange for this nice date. I think you’ll be on the road toward a mutually beneficial relationship with very little confusion between you.”

So in following your plan, I will have effectively changed my profession to that of a hooker.

Thanks.

[cooperthedog]

Why do you question his interest in you after he professes it and more importantly, would simply loosening the purse strings allay your doubts?

You must care about whatever money he has just a *little* bit. What if the guy makes minimum wage (or is a real estate “investor”), and can’t afford a really nice date?

Also, what you describe almost sounds like you require some sort of earnest money to be put up in the form of a nice date – “proving” his interest in you is “real”.

I think some women are conditioned to expect a lavish date as a sign of how much a suitor cares for them. If you’re of that mindset consider the relativeness of the “nice date”. For example, if your suitor was poor, a really nice date could be construed as a real sacrifice on his part to please you. Assuming the gentlemen has alot of money, what would a really nice date prove? Maybe casual dates are his way of making a meaningful connection with you.

If he really does care for you, he will have learned enough about you from your past conversations to eventually come up with something special, regardless of how much it costs.

As for the prenup, I would consider it as another form of insurance for my assets. At the outset, no one plans for their home to burn down, crash their car, or get a divorce. Not having insurance in the first two instances is considered very foolish, why not the third?

[cooperthedog]

Why do you question his interest in you after he professes it and more importantly, would simply loosening the purse strings allay your doubts?

You must care about whatever money he has just a *little* bit. What if the guy makes minimum wage (or is a real estate “investor”), and can’t afford a really nice date?

Also, what you describe almost sounds like you require some sort of earnest money to be put up in the form of a nice date – “proving” his interest in you is “real”.

I think some women are conditioned to expect a lavish date as a sign of how much a suitor cares for them. If you’re of that mindset consider the relativeness of the “nice date”. For example, if your suitor was poor, a really nice date could be construed as a real sacrifice on his part to please you. Assuming the gentlemen has alot of money, what would a really nice date prove? Maybe casual dates are his way of making a meaningful connection with you.

If he really does care for you, he will have learned enough about you from your past conversations to eventually come up with something special, regardless of how much it costs.

As for the prenup, I would consider it as another form of insurance for my assets. At the outset, no one plans for their home to burn down, crash their car, or get a divorce. Not having insurance in the first two instances is considered very foolish, why not the third?

[cooperthedog]

Why do you question his interest in you after he professes it and more importantly, would simply loosening the purse strings allay your doubts?

You must care about whatever money he has just a *little* bit. What if the guy makes minimum wage (or is a real estate “investor”), and can’t afford a really nice date?

Also, what you describe almost sounds like you require some sort of earnest money to be put up in the form of a nice date – “proving” his interest in you is “real”.

I think some women are conditioned to expect a lavish date as a sign of how much a suitor cares for them. If you’re of that mindset consider the relativeness of the “nice date”. For example, if your suitor was poor, a really nice date could be construed as a real sacrifice on his part to please you. Assuming the gentlemen has alot of money, what would a really nice date prove? Maybe casual dates are his way of making a meaningful connection with you.

If he really does care for you, he will have learned enough about you from your past conversations to eventually come up with something special, regardless of how much it costs.

As for the prenup, I would consider it as another form of insurance for my assets. At the outset, no one plans for their home to burn down, crash their car, or get a divorce. Not having insurance in the first two instances is considered very foolish, why not the third?

[cooperthedog]

Why do you question his interest in you after he professes it and more importantly, would simply loosening the purse strings allay your doubts?

You must care about whatever money he has just a *little* bit. What if the guy makes minimum wage (or is a real estate “investor”), and can’t afford a really nice date?

Also, what you describe almost sounds like you require some sort of earnest money to be put up in the form of a nice date – “proving” his interest in you is “real”.

I think some women are conditioned to expect a lavish date as a sign of how much a suitor cares for them. If you’re of that mindset consider the relativeness of the “nice date”. For example, if your suitor was poor, a really nice date could be construed as a real sacrifice on his part to please you. Assuming the gentlemen has alot of money, what would a really nice date prove? Maybe casual dates are his way of making a meaningful connection with you.

If he really does care for you, he will have learned enough about you from your past conversations to eventually come up with something special, regardless of how much it costs.

As for the prenup, I would consider it as another form of insurance for my assets. At the outset, no one plans for their home to burn down, crash their car, or get a divorce. Not having insurance in the first two instances is considered very foolish, why not the third?

[Author]

Posts