- This topic has 800 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 6 months ago by
Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 12, 2007 at 3:36 PM #115467December 12, 2007 at 3:39 PM #115270
VoZangre
ParticipantAssume…
a) Your assumption is actually what I’d LIKE to assume. She’s in the denial stage.
Thus…
” Granted, you’re not legally responsible for the credit-card balances ran up before you got married, or for any loans opened in your spouse’s name alone — provided you keep your finances completely separate. ”
re: http://www.smartmoney.com/divorce/marriage/index.cfm?story=mistakes
Marion,
Of course you are not “buying” it! The first reason for this is that
a) I am not selling it and
b) you accurately gauge that whether you lend credence or no to the facts as they are is absolutely irrelevant.ciao for now…
Voz
ps- my stomach IS churning a bit!! 🙂
it has more to do w/ myriad details of the logistical sort, the necessity of working this evening and a sore lack of access to whiskey.
December 12, 2007 at 3:39 PM #115396ParticipantAssume…
a) Your assumption is actually what I’d LIKE to assume. She’s in the denial stage.
Thus…
” Granted, you’re not legally responsible for the credit-card balances ran up before you got married, or for any loans opened in your spouse’s name alone — provided you keep your finances completely separate. ”
re: http://www.smartmoney.com/divorce/marriage/index.cfm?story=mistakes
Marion,
Of course you are not “buying” it! The first reason for this is that
a) I am not selling it and
b) you accurately gauge that whether you lend credence or no to the facts as they are is absolutely irrelevant.ciao for now…
Voz
ps- my stomach IS churning a bit!! 🙂
it has more to do w/ myriad details of the logistical sort, the necessity of working this evening and a sore lack of access to whiskey.
December 12, 2007 at 3:39 PM #115433ParticipantAssume…
a) Your assumption is actually what I’d LIKE to assume. She’s in the denial stage.
Thus…
” Granted, you’re not legally responsible for the credit-card balances ran up before you got married, or for any loans opened in your spouse’s name alone — provided you keep your finances completely separate. ”
re: http://www.smartmoney.com/divorce/marriage/index.cfm?story=mistakes
Marion,
Of course you are not “buying” it! The first reason for this is that
a) I am not selling it and
b) you accurately gauge that whether you lend credence or no to the facts as they are is absolutely irrelevant.ciao for now…
Voz
ps- my stomach IS churning a bit!! 🙂
it has more to do w/ myriad details of the logistical sort, the necessity of working this evening and a sore lack of access to whiskey.
December 12, 2007 at 3:39 PM #115437ParticipantAssume…
a) Your assumption is actually what I’d LIKE to assume. She’s in the denial stage.
Thus…
” Granted, you’re not legally responsible for the credit-card balances ran up before you got married, or for any loans opened in your spouse’s name alone — provided you keep your finances completely separate. ”
re: http://www.smartmoney.com/divorce/marriage/index.cfm?story=mistakes
Marion,
Of course you are not “buying” it! The first reason for this is that
a) I am not selling it and
b) you accurately gauge that whether you lend credence or no to the facts as they are is absolutely irrelevant.ciao for now…
Voz
ps- my stomach IS churning a bit!! 🙂
it has more to do w/ myriad details of the logistical sort, the necessity of working this evening and a sore lack of access to whiskey.
December 12, 2007 at 3:39 PM #115473ParticipantAssume…
a) Your assumption is actually what I’d LIKE to assume. She’s in the denial stage.
Thus…
” Granted, you’re not legally responsible for the credit-card balances ran up before you got married, or for any loans opened in your spouse’s name alone — provided you keep your finances completely separate. ”
re: http://www.smartmoney.com/divorce/marriage/index.cfm?story=mistakes
Marion,
Of course you are not “buying” it! The first reason for this is that
a) I am not selling it and
b) you accurately gauge that whether you lend credence or no to the facts as they are is absolutely irrelevant.ciao for now…
Voz
ps- my stomach IS churning a bit!! 🙂
it has more to do w/ myriad details of the logistical sort, the necessity of working this evening and a sore lack of access to whiskey.
December 12, 2007 at 4:12 PM #115295cooperthedog
ParticipantMarion,
Lets assume you meet mr. right and you now have that critical joint-checking account… at some point in the future your new husband wants to settle down and buy a house, since you state that you will NEVER buy a house with a man again, how does this proceed?
1) Buy adjoining condos, or a duplex, using money from your separate accounts & knock out a common wall.
2) Use his accounts to secure the loan, but make sure the deed is joint-tentants…
If he already owns a house, do you require joint ownership, is this a “deal-breaker” too, and if so, would you be willing to put yourself on the mortgage (assume the current housing market).
Just curious.
December 12, 2007 at 4:12 PM #115421ParticipantMarion,
Lets assume you meet mr. right and you now have that critical joint-checking account… at some point in the future your new husband wants to settle down and buy a house, since you state that you will NEVER buy a house with a man again, how does this proceed?
1) Buy adjoining condos, or a duplex, using money from your separate accounts & knock out a common wall.
2) Use his accounts to secure the loan, but make sure the deed is joint-tentants…
If he already owns a house, do you require joint ownership, is this a “deal-breaker” too, and if so, would you be willing to put yourself on the mortgage (assume the current housing market).
Just curious.
December 12, 2007 at 4:12 PM #115458ParticipantMarion,
Lets assume you meet mr. right and you now have that critical joint-checking account… at some point in the future your new husband wants to settle down and buy a house, since you state that you will NEVER buy a house with a man again, how does this proceed?
1) Buy adjoining condos, or a duplex, using money from your separate accounts & knock out a common wall.
2) Use his accounts to secure the loan, but make sure the deed is joint-tentants…
If he already owns a house, do you require joint ownership, is this a “deal-breaker” too, and if so, would you be willing to put yourself on the mortgage (assume the current housing market).
Just curious.
December 12, 2007 at 4:12 PM #115461ParticipantMarion,
Lets assume you meet mr. right and you now have that critical joint-checking account… at some point in the future your new husband wants to settle down and buy a house, since you state that you will NEVER buy a house with a man again, how does this proceed?
1) Buy adjoining condos, or a duplex, using money from your separate accounts & knock out a common wall.
2) Use his accounts to secure the loan, but make sure the deed is joint-tentants…
If he already owns a house, do you require joint ownership, is this a “deal-breaker” too, and if so, would you be willing to put yourself on the mortgage (assume the current housing market).
Just curious.
December 12, 2007 at 4:12 PM #115498ParticipantMarion,
Lets assume you meet mr. right and you now have that critical joint-checking account… at some point in the future your new husband wants to settle down and buy a house, since you state that you will NEVER buy a house with a man again, how does this proceed?
1) Buy adjoining condos, or a duplex, using money from your separate accounts & knock out a common wall.
2) Use his accounts to secure the loan, but make sure the deed is joint-tentants…
If he already owns a house, do you require joint ownership, is this a “deal-breaker” too, and if so, would you be willing to put yourself on the mortgage (assume the current housing market).
Just curious.
December 12, 2007 at 4:24 PM #115300Anonymous
GuestVoz: “Assume…
a) Your assumption is actually what I’d LIKE to assume. She’s in the denial stage.
Thus…
” Granted, you’re not legally responsible for the credit-card balances ran up before you got married, or for any loans opened in your spouse’s name alone — provided you keep your finances completely separate. ”
Voz,
assuming…
it’s correct that 50% of marriages end in divorce, whatever amount of money you’re trying to protect from her creditors is a waste of time anyway…
Kiss it goodbye.
You might win the coin toss so relax a little on the paranoia.
Oh, and since you only have a week before the wedding night, lay off the whiskey a bit; It’s not good for the libido.
December 12, 2007 at 4:24 PM #115426GuestVoz: “Assume…
a) Your assumption is actually what I’d LIKE to assume. She’s in the denial stage.
Thus…
” Granted, you’re not legally responsible for the credit-card balances ran up before you got married, or for any loans opened in your spouse’s name alone — provided you keep your finances completely separate. ”
Voz,
assuming…
it’s correct that 50% of marriages end in divorce, whatever amount of money you’re trying to protect from her creditors is a waste of time anyway…
Kiss it goodbye.
You might win the coin toss so relax a little on the paranoia.
Oh, and since you only have a week before the wedding night, lay off the whiskey a bit; It’s not good for the libido.
December 12, 2007 at 4:24 PM #115464GuestVoz: “Assume…
a) Your assumption is actually what I’d LIKE to assume. She’s in the denial stage.
Thus…
” Granted, you’re not legally responsible for the credit-card balances ran up before you got married, or for any loans opened in your spouse’s name alone — provided you keep your finances completely separate. ”
Voz,
assuming…
it’s correct that 50% of marriages end in divorce, whatever amount of money you’re trying to protect from her creditors is a waste of time anyway…
Kiss it goodbye.
You might win the coin toss so relax a little on the paranoia.
Oh, and since you only have a week before the wedding night, lay off the whiskey a bit; It’s not good for the libido.
December 12, 2007 at 4:24 PM #115466GuestVoz: “Assume…
a) Your assumption is actually what I’d LIKE to assume. She’s in the denial stage.
Thus…
” Granted, you’re not legally responsible for the credit-card balances ran up before you got married, or for any loans opened in your spouse’s name alone — provided you keep your finances completely separate. ”
Voz,
assuming…
it’s correct that 50% of marriages end in divorce, whatever amount of money you’re trying to protect from her creditors is a waste of time anyway…
Kiss it goodbye.
You might win the coin toss so relax a little on the paranoia.
Oh, and since you only have a week before the wedding night, lay off the whiskey a bit; It’s not good for the libido.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.