- This topic has 315 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
TheBreeze.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 19, 2008 at 11:21 AM #290047October 19, 2008 at 11:22 AM #289700
CAwireman
ParticipantCoop, if it were only that simple…..
October 19, 2008 at 11:22 AM #290009ParticipantCoop, if it were only that simple…..
October 19, 2008 at 11:22 AM #290015ParticipantCoop, if it were only that simple…..
October 19, 2008 at 11:22 AM #290048ParticipantCoop, if it were only that simple…..
October 19, 2008 at 11:22 AM #290052ParticipantCoop, if it were only that simple…..
October 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM #289705TheBreeze
Participant[quote=cooprider]
Well, if you’re not rich you likely work for someone who is, and if that person has to pay higher taxes, kiss that raise good bye. “Spread the wealth”
[/quote]Please masser’ rich person. Please give po’ Willie a raise. I’s dependent on yous’ graft.
Give me an effin’ break. Most people get paid based on the market for their skills. If someone is willing to work hard, they can always improve their lot in life. If the current rich asshole I’m working for won’t pay me for my skills, I’ll just go work for some other rich asshole.
[quote=cooprider]
Came across this info somewhere else and thought it a fitting preview of the liberal takeover:PART 1: Remember the election in 2006?
A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.Since voting in a Democratically controlled Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.America voted for “change” in 2006, and we got it! Remember, it’s Congress that makes the law not the President. He has to work with what’s handed him.
[/quote]If you believe this, you are too mentally challenged to vote.
[quote=cooprider]
PART 2: TAXESblah, blah, blah …
[/quote]Taxes for the middle class will be lower under Obama as the super-rich will have to bear most of the tax burden. McCain will raise taxes on the middle class so that he can lavish more tax cuts on the super-rich. I’d prefer that the super-rich be made to pay for their Iraq War and for the $11 trillion in taxpayer money that Bush has given them.
[quote=cooprider]
Barack Hussein Obama (don’t you just love his middle name) will return to the higher tax rates.
[/quote]More evidence that you are retarded.
[quote=cooprider]
PART 3: Illegal ImmigrationYou think the war in Iraq is costing us too much? Read this…(it goes on to say how illegal immigration costs the US over $300 billion/year.)[/quote]
McCain and Bush were the main supporters of comprehensive immigration reform. Didn’t McCain actually have his name on that bill? In any event, McCain wants to bring in immigrants as cheap labor. Obama pushed for a provision in the bill that would require immigrants to be paid at the prevailing union wage.
If we do end up with increased immigration, I much prefer Obama’s approach that requires that they be paid humanely.
October 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM #290014Participant[quote=cooprider]
Well, if you’re not rich you likely work for someone who is, and if that person has to pay higher taxes, kiss that raise good bye. “Spread the wealth”
[/quote]Please masser’ rich person. Please give po’ Willie a raise. I’s dependent on yous’ graft.
Give me an effin’ break. Most people get paid based on the market for their skills. If someone is willing to work hard, they can always improve their lot in life. If the current rich asshole I’m working for won’t pay me for my skills, I’ll just go work for some other rich asshole.
[quote=cooprider]
Came across this info somewhere else and thought it a fitting preview of the liberal takeover:PART 1: Remember the election in 2006?
A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.Since voting in a Democratically controlled Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.America voted for “change” in 2006, and we got it! Remember, it’s Congress that makes the law not the President. He has to work with what’s handed him.
[/quote]If you believe this, you are too mentally challenged to vote.
[quote=cooprider]
PART 2: TAXESblah, blah, blah …
[/quote]Taxes for the middle class will be lower under Obama as the super-rich will have to bear most of the tax burden. McCain will raise taxes on the middle class so that he can lavish more tax cuts on the super-rich. I’d prefer that the super-rich be made to pay for their Iraq War and for the $11 trillion in taxpayer money that Bush has given them.
[quote=cooprider]
Barack Hussein Obama (don’t you just love his middle name) will return to the higher tax rates.
[/quote]More evidence that you are retarded.
[quote=cooprider]
PART 3: Illegal ImmigrationYou think the war in Iraq is costing us too much? Read this…(it goes on to say how illegal immigration costs the US over $300 billion/year.)[/quote]
McCain and Bush were the main supporters of comprehensive immigration reform. Didn’t McCain actually have his name on that bill? In any event, McCain wants to bring in immigrants as cheap labor. Obama pushed for a provision in the bill that would require immigrants to be paid at the prevailing union wage.
If we do end up with increased immigration, I much prefer Obama’s approach that requires that they be paid humanely.
October 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM #290020Participant[quote=cooprider]
Well, if you’re not rich you likely work for someone who is, and if that person has to pay higher taxes, kiss that raise good bye. “Spread the wealth”
[/quote]Please masser’ rich person. Please give po’ Willie a raise. I’s dependent on yous’ graft.
Give me an effin’ break. Most people get paid based on the market for their skills. If someone is willing to work hard, they can always improve their lot in life. If the current rich asshole I’m working for won’t pay me for my skills, I’ll just go work for some other rich asshole.
[quote=cooprider]
Came across this info somewhere else and thought it a fitting preview of the liberal takeover:PART 1: Remember the election in 2006?
A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.Since voting in a Democratically controlled Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.America voted for “change” in 2006, and we got it! Remember, it’s Congress that makes the law not the President. He has to work with what’s handed him.
[/quote]If you believe this, you are too mentally challenged to vote.
[quote=cooprider]
PART 2: TAXESblah, blah, blah …
[/quote]Taxes for the middle class will be lower under Obama as the super-rich will have to bear most of the tax burden. McCain will raise taxes on the middle class so that he can lavish more tax cuts on the super-rich. I’d prefer that the super-rich be made to pay for their Iraq War and for the $11 trillion in taxpayer money that Bush has given them.
[quote=cooprider]
Barack Hussein Obama (don’t you just love his middle name) will return to the higher tax rates.
[/quote]More evidence that you are retarded.
[quote=cooprider]
PART 3: Illegal ImmigrationYou think the war in Iraq is costing us too much? Read this…(it goes on to say how illegal immigration costs the US over $300 billion/year.)[/quote]
McCain and Bush were the main supporters of comprehensive immigration reform. Didn’t McCain actually have his name on that bill? In any event, McCain wants to bring in immigrants as cheap labor. Obama pushed for a provision in the bill that would require immigrants to be paid at the prevailing union wage.
If we do end up with increased immigration, I much prefer Obama’s approach that requires that they be paid humanely.
October 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM #290053Participant[quote=cooprider]
Well, if you’re not rich you likely work for someone who is, and if that person has to pay higher taxes, kiss that raise good bye. “Spread the wealth”
[/quote]Please masser’ rich person. Please give po’ Willie a raise. I’s dependent on yous’ graft.
Give me an effin’ break. Most people get paid based on the market for their skills. If someone is willing to work hard, they can always improve their lot in life. If the current rich asshole I’m working for won’t pay me for my skills, I’ll just go work for some other rich asshole.
[quote=cooprider]
Came across this info somewhere else and thought it a fitting preview of the liberal takeover:PART 1: Remember the election in 2006?
A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.Since voting in a Democratically controlled Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.America voted for “change” in 2006, and we got it! Remember, it’s Congress that makes the law not the President. He has to work with what’s handed him.
[/quote]If you believe this, you are too mentally challenged to vote.
[quote=cooprider]
PART 2: TAXESblah, blah, blah …
[/quote]Taxes for the middle class will be lower under Obama as the super-rich will have to bear most of the tax burden. McCain will raise taxes on the middle class so that he can lavish more tax cuts on the super-rich. I’d prefer that the super-rich be made to pay for their Iraq War and for the $11 trillion in taxpayer money that Bush has given them.
[quote=cooprider]
Barack Hussein Obama (don’t you just love his middle name) will return to the higher tax rates.
[/quote]More evidence that you are retarded.
[quote=cooprider]
PART 3: Illegal ImmigrationYou think the war in Iraq is costing us too much? Read this…(it goes on to say how illegal immigration costs the US over $300 billion/year.)[/quote]
McCain and Bush were the main supporters of comprehensive immigration reform. Didn’t McCain actually have his name on that bill? In any event, McCain wants to bring in immigrants as cheap labor. Obama pushed for a provision in the bill that would require immigrants to be paid at the prevailing union wage.
If we do end up with increased immigration, I much prefer Obama’s approach that requires that they be paid humanely.
October 19, 2008 at 11:38 AM #290057Participant[quote=cooprider]
Well, if you’re not rich you likely work for someone who is, and if that person has to pay higher taxes, kiss that raise good bye. “Spread the wealth”
[/quote]Please masser’ rich person. Please give po’ Willie a raise. I’s dependent on yous’ graft.
Give me an effin’ break. Most people get paid based on the market for their skills. If someone is willing to work hard, they can always improve their lot in life. If the current rich asshole I’m working for won’t pay me for my skills, I’ll just go work for some other rich asshole.
[quote=cooprider]
Came across this info somewhere else and thought it a fitting preview of the liberal takeover:PART 1: Remember the election in 2006?
A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.Since voting in a Democratically controlled Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion;
6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.America voted for “change” in 2006, and we got it! Remember, it’s Congress that makes the law not the President. He has to work with what’s handed him.
[/quote]If you believe this, you are too mentally challenged to vote.
[quote=cooprider]
PART 2: TAXESblah, blah, blah …
[/quote]Taxes for the middle class will be lower under Obama as the super-rich will have to bear most of the tax burden. McCain will raise taxes on the middle class so that he can lavish more tax cuts on the super-rich. I’d prefer that the super-rich be made to pay for their Iraq War and for the $11 trillion in taxpayer money that Bush has given them.
[quote=cooprider]
Barack Hussein Obama (don’t you just love his middle name) will return to the higher tax rates.
[/quote]More evidence that you are retarded.
[quote=cooprider]
PART 3: Illegal ImmigrationYou think the war in Iraq is costing us too much? Read this…(it goes on to say how illegal immigration costs the US over $300 billion/year.)[/quote]
McCain and Bush were the main supporters of comprehensive immigration reform. Didn’t McCain actually have his name on that bill? In any event, McCain wants to bring in immigrants as cheap labor. Obama pushed for a provision in the bill that would require immigrants to be paid at the prevailing union wage.
If we do end up with increased immigration, I much prefer Obama’s approach that requires that they be paid humanely.
October 19, 2008 at 11:51 AM #289720peterb
ParticipantI have to laugh as I read these various comments as it reminds me of the statement,” Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.”
October 19, 2008 at 11:51 AM #290029ParticipantI have to laugh as I read these various comments as it reminds me of the statement,” Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.”
October 19, 2008 at 11:51 AM #290035ParticipantI have to laugh as I read these various comments as it reminds me of the statement,” Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.”
October 19, 2008 at 11:51 AM #290068ParticipantI have to laugh as I read these various comments as it reminds me of the statement,” Rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.”
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.