- This topic has 315 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 2 months ago by TheBreeze.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 19, 2008 at 4:42 PM #290142October 19, 2008 at 4:42 PM #289795kewpParticipant
I’d like to hear reactions on this?
They all share the same brain.
Look at the latest anti-Obama smear from their nutball supporters:
Bunch of hick, redneck racist douchebags, the lot.
October 19, 2008 at 4:42 PM #290104kewpParticipantI’d like to hear reactions on this?
They all share the same brain.
Look at the latest anti-Obama smear from their nutball supporters:
Bunch of hick, redneck racist douchebags, the lot.
October 19, 2008 at 4:42 PM #290110kewpParticipantI’d like to hear reactions on this?
They all share the same brain.
Look at the latest anti-Obama smear from their nutball supporters:
Bunch of hick, redneck racist douchebags, the lot.
October 19, 2008 at 4:42 PM #290143kewpParticipantI’d like to hear reactions on this?
They all share the same brain.
Look at the latest anti-Obama smear from their nutball supporters:
Bunch of hick, redneck racist douchebags, the lot.
October 19, 2008 at 4:42 PM #290147kewpParticipantI’d like to hear reactions on this?
They all share the same brain.
Look at the latest anti-Obama smear from their nutball supporters:
Bunch of hick, redneck racist douchebags, the lot.
October 19, 2008 at 5:03 PM #289800AecetiaParticipantThe Obama bucks cartoon is ignorant. You can’t believe after the election is over it will be one big happy country. I think whoever wins it will be very unpleasant and divisive, probably almost as unpleasant as it has been with Bush as President.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
“In both 1933 and 1965, liberal majorities imposed vast expansions of government that have never been repealed, and the current financial panic may give today’s left another pretext to return to those heydays of welfare-state liberalism. Americans voting for “change” should know they may get far more than they ever imagined.” I am concerned about big government regardless of who is growing it.
October 19, 2008 at 5:03 PM #290109AecetiaParticipantThe Obama bucks cartoon is ignorant. You can’t believe after the election is over it will be one big happy country. I think whoever wins it will be very unpleasant and divisive, probably almost as unpleasant as it has been with Bush as President.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
“In both 1933 and 1965, liberal majorities imposed vast expansions of government that have never been repealed, and the current financial panic may give today’s left another pretext to return to those heydays of welfare-state liberalism. Americans voting for “change” should know they may get far more than they ever imagined.” I am concerned about big government regardless of who is growing it.
October 19, 2008 at 5:03 PM #290115AecetiaParticipantThe Obama bucks cartoon is ignorant. You can’t believe after the election is over it will be one big happy country. I think whoever wins it will be very unpleasant and divisive, probably almost as unpleasant as it has been with Bush as President.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
“In both 1933 and 1965, liberal majorities imposed vast expansions of government that have never been repealed, and the current financial panic may give today’s left another pretext to return to those heydays of welfare-state liberalism. Americans voting for “change” should know they may get far more than they ever imagined.” I am concerned about big government regardless of who is growing it.
October 19, 2008 at 5:03 PM #290148AecetiaParticipantThe Obama bucks cartoon is ignorant. You can’t believe after the election is over it will be one big happy country. I think whoever wins it will be very unpleasant and divisive, probably almost as unpleasant as it has been with Bush as President.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
“In both 1933 and 1965, liberal majorities imposed vast expansions of government that have never been repealed, and the current financial panic may give today’s left another pretext to return to those heydays of welfare-state liberalism. Americans voting for “change” should know they may get far more than they ever imagined.” I am concerned about big government regardless of who is growing it.
October 19, 2008 at 5:03 PM #290152AecetiaParticipantThe Obama bucks cartoon is ignorant. You can’t believe after the election is over it will be one big happy country. I think whoever wins it will be very unpleasant and divisive, probably almost as unpleasant as it has been with Bush as President.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122420205889842989.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
“In both 1933 and 1965, liberal majorities imposed vast expansions of government that have never been repealed, and the current financial panic may give today’s left another pretext to return to those heydays of welfare-state liberalism. Americans voting for “change” should know they may get far more than they ever imagined.” I am concerned about big government regardless of who is growing it.
October 19, 2008 at 5:27 PM #289815Allan from FallbrookParticipantGandalf: Dude. Stop name calling; you’re better than that. Calling a guy a dick because you disagree with him is exactly the same sort of stuff you argued AGAINST on other threads and in other posts.
Yeah, you’re right about old line “real” Republicans bemoaning the fate of the GOP. I’m one of them. The McCain/Palin card appalls me, as does the clearly mercenary thinking behind it. We’ve lost our way, and of that there is no doubt. However, that doesn’t automatically make Obama the answer and for anyone to represent that he is the magic bullet in this equation shows the same lack of credulity that allows conservatives to swallow Sarah Palin as anything other than a divisive, ignorant heretic. And, yes, I did mean the word “heretic”.
Aecetia makes the excellent point that we need to watch out for Big Goverment, in whatever guise it approaches. Old Ronny Raygun was correct when he opined about the scariest thing you could hear was, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.
FDR did not lead us out of the wilderness of the Great Depression and there are arguments that his policies in many ways were as badly misguided as Hoover’s. Obama does not have the chops, either, but not out of any lack of ability. Rather, the twin dangers he represents are lack of experience and the evangelical belief that true leftists have in the transformative power of Big Government.
You cannot legislate good behavior and you cannot tax a country into prosperity.
October 19, 2008 at 5:27 PM #290124Allan from FallbrookParticipantGandalf: Dude. Stop name calling; you’re better than that. Calling a guy a dick because you disagree with him is exactly the same sort of stuff you argued AGAINST on other threads and in other posts.
Yeah, you’re right about old line “real” Republicans bemoaning the fate of the GOP. I’m one of them. The McCain/Palin card appalls me, as does the clearly mercenary thinking behind it. We’ve lost our way, and of that there is no doubt. However, that doesn’t automatically make Obama the answer and for anyone to represent that he is the magic bullet in this equation shows the same lack of credulity that allows conservatives to swallow Sarah Palin as anything other than a divisive, ignorant heretic. And, yes, I did mean the word “heretic”.
Aecetia makes the excellent point that we need to watch out for Big Goverment, in whatever guise it approaches. Old Ronny Raygun was correct when he opined about the scariest thing you could hear was, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.
FDR did not lead us out of the wilderness of the Great Depression and there are arguments that his policies in many ways were as badly misguided as Hoover’s. Obama does not have the chops, either, but not out of any lack of ability. Rather, the twin dangers he represents are lack of experience and the evangelical belief that true leftists have in the transformative power of Big Government.
You cannot legislate good behavior and you cannot tax a country into prosperity.
October 19, 2008 at 5:27 PM #290130Allan from FallbrookParticipantGandalf: Dude. Stop name calling; you’re better than that. Calling a guy a dick because you disagree with him is exactly the same sort of stuff you argued AGAINST on other threads and in other posts.
Yeah, you’re right about old line “real” Republicans bemoaning the fate of the GOP. I’m one of them. The McCain/Palin card appalls me, as does the clearly mercenary thinking behind it. We’ve lost our way, and of that there is no doubt. However, that doesn’t automatically make Obama the answer and for anyone to represent that he is the magic bullet in this equation shows the same lack of credulity that allows conservatives to swallow Sarah Palin as anything other than a divisive, ignorant heretic. And, yes, I did mean the word “heretic”.
Aecetia makes the excellent point that we need to watch out for Big Goverment, in whatever guise it approaches. Old Ronny Raygun was correct when he opined about the scariest thing you could hear was, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.
FDR did not lead us out of the wilderness of the Great Depression and there are arguments that his policies in many ways were as badly misguided as Hoover’s. Obama does not have the chops, either, but not out of any lack of ability. Rather, the twin dangers he represents are lack of experience and the evangelical belief that true leftists have in the transformative power of Big Government.
You cannot legislate good behavior and you cannot tax a country into prosperity.
October 19, 2008 at 5:27 PM #290163Allan from FallbrookParticipantGandalf: Dude. Stop name calling; you’re better than that. Calling a guy a dick because you disagree with him is exactly the same sort of stuff you argued AGAINST on other threads and in other posts.
Yeah, you’re right about old line “real” Republicans bemoaning the fate of the GOP. I’m one of them. The McCain/Palin card appalls me, as does the clearly mercenary thinking behind it. We’ve lost our way, and of that there is no doubt. However, that doesn’t automatically make Obama the answer and for anyone to represent that he is the magic bullet in this equation shows the same lack of credulity that allows conservatives to swallow Sarah Palin as anything other than a divisive, ignorant heretic. And, yes, I did mean the word “heretic”.
Aecetia makes the excellent point that we need to watch out for Big Goverment, in whatever guise it approaches. Old Ronny Raygun was correct when he opined about the scariest thing you could hear was, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”.
FDR did not lead us out of the wilderness of the Great Depression and there are arguments that his policies in many ways were as badly misguided as Hoover’s. Obama does not have the chops, either, but not out of any lack of ability. Rather, the twin dangers he represents are lack of experience and the evangelical belief that true leftists have in the transformative power of Big Government.
You cannot legislate good behavior and you cannot tax a country into prosperity.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.