- This topic has 80 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 3 months ago by djc.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 21, 2008 at 1:02 PM #273772September 21, 2008 at 9:23 PM #273742djcParticipant
[quote=paramount]This bailout reminds me of the Patriot Act “process” – ram it through quickly (without thorough review/debate) or else there will be dire consequences.
Seems like a very similiar strategy.
Scary…[/quote]
EXACTLY what I was thinking. These ’emergency powers’ have changed the balance of power in the federal gov’t. for the worse. We have new rules in the name of ‘security’, telecomm’s spying on private citizens without warrants, ridiculous passport requirements (TJ anyone?), etc.
Congress should not grant this request. They will, and Bush will be the scapegoat, but the future administrations will enjoy the new powers they have.
September 21, 2008 at 9:23 PM #273987djcParticipant[quote=paramount]This bailout reminds me of the Patriot Act “process” – ram it through quickly (without thorough review/debate) or else there will be dire consequences.
Seems like a very similiar strategy.
Scary…[/quote]
EXACTLY what I was thinking. These ’emergency powers’ have changed the balance of power in the federal gov’t. for the worse. We have new rules in the name of ‘security’, telecomm’s spying on private citizens without warrants, ridiculous passport requirements (TJ anyone?), etc.
Congress should not grant this request. They will, and Bush will be the scapegoat, but the future administrations will enjoy the new powers they have.
September 21, 2008 at 9:23 PM #273991djcParticipant[quote=paramount]This bailout reminds me of the Patriot Act “process” – ram it through quickly (without thorough review/debate) or else there will be dire consequences.
Seems like a very similiar strategy.
Scary…[/quote]
EXACTLY what I was thinking. These ’emergency powers’ have changed the balance of power in the federal gov’t. for the worse. We have new rules in the name of ‘security’, telecomm’s spying on private citizens without warrants, ridiculous passport requirements (TJ anyone?), etc.
Congress should not grant this request. They will, and Bush will be the scapegoat, but the future administrations will enjoy the new powers they have.
September 21, 2008 at 9:23 PM #274035djcParticipant[quote=paramount]This bailout reminds me of the Patriot Act “process” – ram it through quickly (without thorough review/debate) or else there will be dire consequences.
Seems like a very similiar strategy.
Scary…[/quote]
EXACTLY what I was thinking. These ’emergency powers’ have changed the balance of power in the federal gov’t. for the worse. We have new rules in the name of ‘security’, telecomm’s spying on private citizens without warrants, ridiculous passport requirements (TJ anyone?), etc.
Congress should not grant this request. They will, and Bush will be the scapegoat, but the future administrations will enjoy the new powers they have.
September 21, 2008 at 9:23 PM #274059djcParticipant[quote=paramount]This bailout reminds me of the Patriot Act “process” – ram it through quickly (without thorough review/debate) or else there will be dire consequences.
Seems like a very similiar strategy.
Scary…[/quote]
EXACTLY what I was thinking. These ’emergency powers’ have changed the balance of power in the federal gov’t. for the worse. We have new rules in the name of ‘security’, telecomm’s spying on private citizens without warrants, ridiculous passport requirements (TJ anyone?), etc.
Congress should not grant this request. They will, and Bush will be the scapegoat, but the future administrations will enjoy the new powers they have.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.